this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2026
23 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23316 readers
238 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How would you describe it?

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 17 points 3 weeks ago

There was an Egyptian communist I came across years ago who described it as "The ability to resist falling apart when encountering contradictions" I always thought that was a useful shorthand

[–] MarxusMaximus@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

A desire to understand things.

There are tons of smart and clever people out there who aren't curious and to me, that means they're not truly intelligent.

[–] Snort_Owl@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Unlimited curiosity and breaking down problems into manageable steps. Also knowing what you don’t know, flexibility to change your beliefs or understanding when proven wrong.

[–] TankieTanuki@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Unlimited curiosity on the First World

[–] gingerbrat@hexbear.net 1 points 3 weeks ago

Make this a tagline!

[–] AntifaCatgirlSuperSoldier@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Tony stark in the marbel movie !

[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

Real recognizes real

[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

The ability to change your current understanding via careful observations over time.

[–] Athena5898@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

Critical thinking, compassion, emotional maturity, always striving to learn and relearn, wonder and excitement of the world.

[–] Aradino@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Glasses, large skull, pens in pocket, possibly a nasally voice

[–] Renin@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

Ability to work on one's own mind with intent. If you want to be really banal about it.

That's what intelligence is to me. It's being alive, as oppose to just existing - which is to follow a stimuli, without question. And part of living is selectively choosing when to let yourself just be.

[–] HiImThomasPynchon@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

The person reading this

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

Being queer is just optimal and effective, sorry I don't make the rules shrug-outta-hecks

[–] Arahnya@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

erudite implies that the knowledge you have is earned rather than some innate trait. The desire to learn and experience new things.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Intelligence is the ability to solve novel problems with a relevent skillset. It's one's ability to use the tools they have developed.

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Humility. You will never have all the answers, but if you study, work hard, apply yourself, cooperate with others, and consider counters to your preconceptions, you might get some of them, and that's a hell of a lot more than most people get.

[–] gingerbrat@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Very essential part of intelligence imo. No matter if you yourself or an entire group is humble about not knowing something, it conveys your ability to learn more still, and also your ability to accept that you don't know something / are wrong. People who aren't humble about what they know always strike me as very unintelligent

[–] anotherspinelessdem@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's also something you tend to see in very high levels of very difficult fields (when they're functioning well). Many serious scientists for instance tend to not make definitive statements often, unless they're supported by tests and evidence.

In contrast, strong definitive assertions without evidence are absolutely the domain of con artists(/salespeople).

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

like the girl reading this🥰

[–] Enjoyer_of_Games@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] g_mer@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

> I think someone should purchase Mantle of Intelligence

[–] Gorillatactics@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

"Intelligence" as a concept has been individualized even though its always been a matter of collective action. There are many forms of intelligence and we need to know how to nourish every type.

[–] ClownPrinceofFools@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

Being able to clear up confusion and increase understanding. True intelligence is contagious

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

pattern recognition, empathy, critical analysis, ability to articulate complex situations and solutions concisely and accurately in plain language.

[–] SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today 4 points 3 weeks ago

Observation without ego. It takes courageous honesty to seek truth when it is often not what we want it to be. I think too many people get stuck on ideas that please them whether those ideas are correct or not.

An honest person does not choose their beliefs, they believe what is most likely true given all available evidence. If a person is not open to the idea of changing their beliefs, they can never get closer to the truth.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ability to synthesize things from different areas into a coherent single system.

In academia this is called “interdisciplinary research.” The ones who have consciously mastered this are the dialecticians (mainly Marxists), since dialectics is the understanding of systems by analysis of each part, both in its particularity and in its relation to the whole, before reconstructing the whole from the concepts obtained from that analysis. In bourgeois academia, interdisciplinary research has a limit that concepts are thought to be fully independent in their being, their interrelations accidental rather than essential.

So I guess being smart is thinking like a Marxist, which is thinking like a scientist (in the broadest sense).

The best physicists tend to have a more or less conscious understanding of dialectics (usually less) since many of the big breakthroughs have come from synthesis and unifying theories. It would be my dream for dialectics to have a more prominent role in physics (and obviously science in general) but I think this can only happen in a Marxist institution.