420
Anthony Welters, a former executive at UnitedHealthCare who worked alongside Thomas in the Reagan administration
A Democratic donor who worked for the Reagan admin? Come on now
It doesn’t really matter. Thomas is easily bought off and that’s the problem.
Yeah I don't think anyone was upset because they thought it was only Republicans bribing people. A bribe from a Democrat(ic/lobbyist/whatever) is the problem. Taking the money and not saying anything about it is the problem to me. His co-worker coming out and saying "yeah congress doesn't have any authority over us" last week is a problem to me. All these ruling-class college frat chums paying each other off and fucking everyone else in the process, is a problem to me.
And this is the difference between us and the Maga cult
agree
I think you misread. The article seems to refer to Thomas’ time when he served in the Reagan administration and working alongside Welters who was an executive at UnitedHealthCare at the time.
I agree it’s awkwardly phrased and hard to follow.
Looks to me that Weller is an R who worked for Reagan at the time of the donation. His wife may have worked for Obama later on and could indeed be a Dem, or perhaps switched.
Probably donates so the Dems don’t do single payer.
the dates and who was actually doing the donating at the time makes a difference.
I don't care what their politics is. I hope pro publica takes this up and tracks the money to the source and prints eye watering story about it.
This is the way.
Why is that hard to believe? Trump used to be a Democrat, Biden voted for anti-LGBQT laws (eg. DOMA), Liz Cheney has recently supported LGBQT rights, etc.
Trump has never been anything other than a deranged psychopath. He's non-political. What I mean is it really doesn't matter. Corruption is just corruption. The reporting is misleading. That's what I take issue with.
I know, but Trump isn't the only corrupt politician who cares more about power than policy.
Man, I want a job where people just give me six figures in addition to my salary and I can do whatever the fuck I want with it.
"Good afternoon Bob.".
"Good afternoon, Soda. How's the family?".
"Doing great, not affected by anything I do at work at all.".
"That's great, Soda. Oh by the way here's $300,000"
"Nice, thank you Bob. I'll see you around."
That's a day in the life for members of Congress
Why can the SC accept donations if they are supposed to be impartial?
Cause they're crooked.
Especially Thomas, holy cow.
There are no rules saying they can't. This is all still legal if completely immoral. SCOTUS is a co-equal branch of the government which in the past had be given to regulating itself. It's starting to look like Congress will have to step in and pass some ethics constraints since SCOTUS won't adopt one.
Why would a justice need a donation? They don't have campaigns to finance. There isn't any legal justification for a "donation".
"I didn't pay that hitman, detective. I donated to him."
When articles refer to these payments as "donations", they are becoming complicit in the lie.
It's always been rich vs poor.
We should set up a GoFundMe and buy our own Supreme Court Justice. Does anyone have a coupon?
Reminds me of an episode of Common Sense by Dan Carlin from yeeears ago that basically said "the system is corrupt and voters aren't able to command our politicians to do what we want, so what if we just pool money together and bribe them too?"
It sounds like you just invented elections.
What sort of bizarre elections are you voting in? I haven't had the chance to bribe a politician with cash at the ballot box even once!
Will this make conservatives care now?
Will it fuck.
THey would have cared if it was a Dem judge. It's okay for CT
Not sure why this is such a big deal. He’s allowed to do it because no one will stop him. There is zero accountability in American governments.
What a piece of shit. Fuck Clarence Thomas.
Capitalism doesnt give a fuck about party.
What is RV ?
Caravan, camper. Something that costs $200k+ would look like this and be more like a house on a bus:
$200k then is like 400k now, that's a crazy ass RV O_O
Recreational Vehicle. Like a home on wheels.
this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
420 points (97.7% liked)
politics
19096 readers
1159 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS