this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
55 points (96.6% liked)

Progressive Politics

4871 readers
278 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Company insists it remains committed to 2040 net-zero carbon emission goals

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] dudeface@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I stopped using Amazon like 5 years ago, I get annoyed when eBay purchases show up in Amazon packaging because they use Amazon logistics

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I stopped using it 20 years ago, but the point is that this kind of shit still affects all of us, customers or not. These fuckers are intent on burning down our planet just so billionaires can add some extra billions to their pile of money, and a handful of myopic techbros can go "Well akshually it is a very useful tool if you know how to use it".

Fuck them all and their selfish murderous ways.

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

^^absolutely

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"We're committed to 2040 net-zero goals."

"But how do you plan on getting there?"

"We're committed to it."

Btw, net-zero is just a greenwashing term. Allowing emissions while balancing them on some spreadsheet in some obscure way is not the same as reducing emissions. It allows more pollution while pretending something is being done about it. Hey, like good old recycling.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That is only partially true. With a working CO2 emission trading scheme this "balancing" means massive amounts of cross financing of beneficial projects, eg for renewable ebergy projects etc. It adds a financial benefit to saving emissions and that is the only language markets seem to understand. It is by no means perfect but it is not just greeneashing and nothing else.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Who the fuck authorized this?

[–] rounding_error@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

The company remains committed to 2040… er… no- 2050, no- 2060 goals