this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
351 points (95.6% liked)

Work Reform

17117 readers
1921 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

they forgot about gays and people of colors in video games!

[–] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

Those thing aren't even radical left

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

The radical part of the dems are the centrist

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Yeah where is the Tubular Left and the Gnarly Right.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Radical Right: Dismantle democratic elections (to stay in power)

Radical Left: Make elections freer and fairer (to have a say in governance)

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Centrists: Let's meet in the middle and dismantle half of elections, eh?

[–] affenlehrer@feddit.org 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I don't think you have a left in the US. You have far right and center right. In Germany it's like you had only AfD and CDU and that's it.

I mean it's still obvious which choice is better but none of them is left.

We don't have a large, cohesive, left party. There are people who are certainly left in the USA, but we have no real representation out of a handful of congress people.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

From the 20th century, we have the ideological war against USSR to thank for that. It started all the way back with Wilson. After WWII, the threat of nuclear annihilation was a powerful tool for nationalism. (I'd learn only recently that a first strike was far more likely to come from US than USSR, and we had some dangerous war hawks in power.)

Before that, after reconstruction came redemption and corporate interests took over both parties.

Before that, roads, schools, bridges, libraries and such were socialism giving the working man benefits to which they didn't contribute (we just contributed all the labor). Yes, they called it socialism even back in the 19th century.

Do observe that adherence to neoliberalism in the EU (which is essentially corporatism with extra steps) is driving the rise of far right movements even over there. And when the tech-bros and white Christian nationalists over here are done bleeding the US dry like its private equity, they'll be headed over there with their vast wealth to do the same thing.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 1 hour ago

You can go back further than that.

The 1917 russian revolution kicked it off. The fear of a workers revolution happening in the US started a campaign of labelling everything socialist and communist as anti-american.

[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

American 2 party system is so fucked that anything left of rabid, far right fascism is considered far left

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Centrist: a right winger that doesn’t want to face the realities of either situation.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of centrists, are frankly, kind of weak minded. A lot are not necessarily more right leaning but they don't exactly have strong conviction. A friend of mine is right leaning on immigration and economics but at the same time he voted for the social democrats in his country because of over a decade of right wing government and supports Palestine. Some are centrists for the sake of being centrist it seems.

The problem as to why many centrists sound right leaning is because the right captured prominent media platforms, and a huge part of its audience are lonely folks who are susceptible to misinformation, which my friend falls into. Many don't become firmly on right but that doesn't matter for the right wing billionaires funding the media platforms. It's about sowing enough doubt to prevent forming a united front against the billionaire-Epstein class.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

your a centrest because your scared of taking a stance on most important questions of the current moment

I'm a centrist because I don't know anything about the most important questions of the current moment

We are sort of the same

[–] yenahmik@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I always considered myself a centrist. Of course, over the last 15 years the one side has become so damn batshit crazy it looks like I'm a party line voter simply based on my voting record.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

Why do I have to choose between the radical left and the radical right?

What if I’m a male xenophobic racist who wants women to exist as sex toys to men and have no rights of their own and supports killing random civilians and children in other countries, especially when it grows in to genocide, but also wants a good life for the common male workers of the country, universal healthcare, and a sustainable climate?

I want that universal health care and education, I want more affordable homes and such, but I also want to see goon squads in the street beating brown people with batons as often as possible because it makes me laugh. Why can't I have both?

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

If you stop thinking about sides as whole and start thinking about singular choices, it becomes easy to understand where do centrists come from.

I like tradition. I don't think it should be untouchable, but I think it should be preserved and continued overall. I dislike globalism, valuing feeling of community with people from my country. I hate the idea of bending backwards just to fully accomodate whims of other people, even if these pertain to their feeling of self.

On the other hand, I hate the idea of functionally sorting people based on their skin, using traditions to shame and attack others, or deeming others as worse just because what they feel themselves be is different than what we perceive.

I hate censorship from both sides, portrayal of the other side as dumb and themselves as better and tendency for "group-thing" for humanity as a whole.

So yeah, i deem myself centrist. But if you ask me to join the side fighting fascists, nazis or communists (in the USSR sense of the word), I'm with ya.

[–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 1 points 30 minutes ago

Sounds like you're mostly conservative, with a desire for others to feel good about themselves.

The Danish conservative party is pretty close to your requests, except for the degree at which you seem to be pro immigration

[–] katkit@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I'm firmly left and have started to see your perspective a bit more recently. I think we tend to generalize groups of people by their bad examples, which is also done to and by centrists.

I'm thankful for the perspective of reasonable centrists, who are able to look at the reality of a situation and judge fairly, to add nuance and build bridges. What affirmed me in my group think for a long time was radicalized centrists, who are more interested in equating left and right regardless of circumstance, than in grasping problems with an open mind.

But I think I understand how that happens. It's frustrating for many leftists to have to choose between two options they don't agree with, center and right, so some become blind to their differences and fall into group-think. Maybe it is the same for centrists, some of which also start to portray all left and right as dumb ideologues and themselves as above criticism from other worldviews.

So I agree with you. We should think about singular choices more than about sides. And frankly, I really enjoy finding common ground with people from different walks of life recently.

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I hate the idea of bending backwards just to fully accomodate whims of other people

Care to give an example when you have ever really needed to bend over backwards?

[–] nil@piefed.ca 3 points 1 day ago

center is bullshit. You're the center for your view

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 points 22 hours ago

Post link: https://www.threads.com/@alisonrosen/post/DbtbUqDDwpj/stop-making-me-choose-between-the-radical-left-and-the-radical-right

btw, does anyone have something to see threads posts without gettin on threads website?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

STOP MAKING ME CHOOSE

says Threads account run by a DC corporate think tank.

[–] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

We need some police. Just some.

[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

But not these ones, better ones.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Social workers? Yes. Police as we know them? Nope. Proper education and mental health services will solve 99% of the problems. Most crime is unresolved personal issues and taking care of people will take care of the problems.

load more comments (1 replies)

Just enough to kill the untermenchen and keep people from objecting to my atrocities where I can hear. That's such a reasonable thing I don't know why they're complaining there are too many.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Is that really Alison rosen now? Or was she joking herself? Stupid screenshot culture and no link....

load more comments
view more: next ›