this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2026
274 points (94.8% liked)

memes

22258 readers
2021 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] justdaveisfine@piefed.social 46 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I still consider it HD lol

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Cartoons, absolutely. Live action, 1080p is perfect for 4k TVs without needing 4k stream and it saves GBs.

[–] itisileclerk@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

And 1080p is Full HD.
1440p is Quad HD.
2160p/4K is Ultra HD.
4320p/8K is also Ultra HD, for some bonus confusion.

[–] IdontplaytheTrombone@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's still good on phone screens.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 days ago

It's still good on PC monitors with astigmatism :')

And handheld game consoles

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (7 children)

It still is, but nobody cares anymore. At 16:9 1920x1080 is considered "Full High Definition," and 3840x2160 (at minimum) is "Ultra High Definition," at least in terms of their official marketing speak. The latter has mutated to include both 4K and 8K content somehow, apparently because the brainworms in the marketing department ran out of superlatives after "Ultra."

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)

They should've hired tea industry execs. If the tea industry can come up with grades like "Special Finest Tippy Golden Flowery Orange Pekoe", they can come up with something beyond Ultra High Definition.

Maybe like this:

  • High Definition (HD)
  • Full High Definition (FHD)
  • Ultra High Definition (UHD)
  • Very Ultra High Definition (VUHD)
  • Special Very Ultra High Definition (SVUHD)
  • Full Special Very Ultra High Definition (FSVUHD or SVUHD1, both are acceptable)

Not that these grades would only apply to displays that don't support picture-in-picture or split screen. Displays with those features ("broken" displays) would use the following equivalent grades instead:

  • High Broken Definition (HBD)
  • Full High Broken Definition (FHBD)
  • Ultra High Broken Definition (UHBD)
  • Golden Ultra High Broken Definition (GUHBD)
  • Special Golden Ultra High Broken Definition (SGUHBD)
  • Full Special Golden Ultra High Broken Definition 1 (FSGUHBD1)
[–] Dookieman12@piefed.social 8 points 3 days ago
  • T = Television
  • IT = Intelligent Television
  • HIT = Highly Intelligent Television
  • SHIT = Super Highly Intelligent Television
[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

We could just use the radio bands, just with definition instead of frequency. High Very high Ultra high Super high Extremely high Tremendously high

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] ugo@feddit.it 3 points 3 days ago

Favourite Goku transformation, underappreciated by most.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 2 points 3 days ago

Should've called 8K Iper High Definition

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It still is.

720 = HD 1080 = Full HD

Then I think there's UHD, before they start labelling them as shortened numbers like 8k

[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Wut? ~~No~~

Update in italics: immediately after posting my comment I see we agree, I just missed it because I had expected a separator between the two formats. I'm going to let my comment be, because it can serve as a reference for others.

1080p = 1920x1080 = "Full HD"
720p = 1280x720 = "HD Ready", or at least according to wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_resolution_standards "HD"

4K has to subtypes 4K UHD and DCI which is both 2160 lines, but UHD is 16:9= 3840 pixels wide, and DCI is slightly wider with 4096 pixel in a 256:135 format. But both are "4K"

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I think you should read your link again. It clearly says 720 is "HD".

"HD Ready" was a marketing term that was sometimes used for things that were both 720 and close to 720.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

1280 × 720 was "HD ready"
1920 × 1080 was "Full HD"

I always thought "HD ready" was a bit of a marketing scam.

[–] captcha_incorrect@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I remember ”HD ready” as HDR, then years later HDR (high dynamic range) came a was very confused as to way a 1080p monitor was marked as HD Ready.

[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago

i still go for 720 all the time because at a certain resolution, you're just starting to see the pimples, at not extra benefit.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 3 points 2 days ago

Having watched 480i content for so long, you better believe 720p felt HD.

These days, I mostly watch 1080p content because at the size/distance I'm watching, 4K just doesn't "buy" any more joy. But, I remember the first time we watched some 4K videos on a new 4K TV, and the nature ones looked like a window and not a screen from across the room.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I remember the 720p vs 1080i wars ...

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Interlacing is trash, fight me

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Whoa there: I said "I remember", not that interlacing was good.

And interlacing is only "good"for old video games that leveraged its weirdness for blending pixels.

It is terrible as a video format.

Remember when your dvd player had a "progressive scan" button?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Like I could afford a DVD player

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 4 points 3 days ago

720p is still better than 1080i

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (5 children)

720p hits that sweet spot between file size and picture clarity so that's my default preference for torrents.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I remember TVs that were "HD compatible" which means they were like 520p, but could downscale an HD signal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] notsure@fedia.io 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

remember when vhs only recorded 250 lines? remember when it was 240 by 320, remember when, fuck you....I remembeer when amber and greeen were the only colors....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lyrial@anarchist.nexus 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My still functional xbmc media server never knew that because I couldn't afford the HD plugs.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Splinter Cell also made the component cable worth it.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Standard definition, high definition, full high definition, ultra definition, AI upscaled ultra high definition, nuclear Holocaust definition, stone age definition

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't forget enhanced definition.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

I remember when youtube basically only had one format and I'm pretty sure it was 240p lol.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Remember when 1080i was a thing? Now it's all but dead beyond broadcast and cable TV (which is pretty much dead).

People used to say that 720p was better because it had a higher vertical resolution at any given moment due to being progressive scan, but IMO 1080i looked better for the most part unless there was a lot of motion in the scene. The resolution was high enough that the flickering from the interlaced images didn't bother me. So I usually went with 1080i over 720p.

[–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

On a small enough screen it still is.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Do I remember? I'm fucking 60, I remember everything y'all ask about and much more.

My current "big" TV is a 1920 X 1080 14-year-old 55" Toshiba dumb TV.

I got a 27" 4K monitor a few months ago, when my old monitor died. I have my second, old 1920 x 1080 monitor next to it. Yes, I can tell the difference, but only in text, not in video.

I wouldn't mind having a 100" OLED 4K TV, but for two things. I don't want to pay for it, and I'm afraid it would die in a couple of years, because my experience has been that new appliances are crap. So, I'll just stick with my old TV, and be happy that it's much better than my 27" Sharp CRT it replaced.

[–] squirrel@cake.kobel.fyi 4 points 3 days ago
[–] freudian_slop@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I still watch 360p on my phone lol.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›