this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
55 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30906 readers
2717 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/50187606

The threat arrives in plain language. “Failure to comply could jeopardize eligibility for state educational scholarship programs,” Uthmeier wrote, aiming at the funding stream that carried roughly 88 percent of Florida’s more than 94,000 Catholic school students last year. He gave the bishops until August 7 to respond — ten days before most Florida schools open for the new year.

Within hours, the attorney general announced the letter on X. “Ironically, they won’t offer religious exemptions as prescribed by state law,” he wrote. “This is troubling and may disqualify them from state scholarships and vouchers.”

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RotatingParts@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Religious schools shouldn't even be getting our tax dollars. Defund them all.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

You don't understand how the program they are talking about works. Its aim is to help low income families have the same opportunities/options as high income families. This is a strike at class equity. Regardless of if you hate religion, giving a poor kid a chance to network into well to do circles should be a good thing. Any private school, regardless of it being religious or secular can be eligible. This is the state government trying to force a religious institution to adopt their political stance. Then the poor are punished if they don't.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We can't let churches control vital infrastructure

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's not what this is at all

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't want churches controlling schools I pay for

[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Just the state

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So don't send your kids to a religious school? This is a tiny percentage given to low income families to make the choice on where to send their kids. Secular or religious the aim is just to give poor kids the same shot as rich kids.

[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Although I think religious exemptions should be widely prohibited

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Like, religious schools are still receiving an special benefit just because they're religious, which is unfair. I also think that the more general defunding is bad, but school or not, you shouldn't receive any special treatment just because of your religious nature.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Any private school is eligible regardless of if they are religious or not. Bunch of secular private schools are in the pool of scholarship eligibility.

[–] Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was not discussing that, I'm with you on that. What I'm talking is about the broader concept and appliance of religious exemptions (you do not pay the same amount of taxes [but a minor amount], or you do not pay taxes at all, because you are religious).

Because, if I understood well, that's also being defunded, and I'm in favor of that, even while I'm not favorable to the idea of defunding them in general, because they still make a valuable social labor.

Sorry if I'm explaining myself bad.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Oh, I mean yeah I guess idk. I have strong thoughts about tithing and how those funds should be treated internally and externally. Not really the place for that conversation though.

[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honest question, where does the money for voucher programs come from?

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Direct public funding through nonprofits raising money, state taxes and tax credits are given to businesses/individuals who donate to the pool of money. Mostly state taxes in a state without income tax.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm still trying to figure out if that is what this is. They keep talking scholarships.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's a social program that gives priority to low income and foster kids. They are able to apply for tuition assistance to any non public approved school. This would essentially just pull catholic schools out of that pool.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Good. Religious schools shouldn't be subsided in the first place, fucking MAGAt morons...

[–] EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app 3 points 2 weeks ago

Perfect, eat each other.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Question: why do religious schools even exist?

[–] Leather@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

To make tax free money.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well the church gets indoctrination and more chances or future tithes. The parents/students (often) get better educational and college choice outcomes vs the schools in the area. I have noticed the religious schools tend to be in areas where the local district is ranked lower in the state. (Which only hurts those schools more by taking the funding share with those students)

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

The schadenfreude is delicious.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

So much for religious freedom!