this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
121 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

907 readers
330 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NephewAlphaBravo@hexbear.net 61 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

damn this "literally communism" makes a good point, i wonder if it makes any other good points

Here's a bunch of good ideas, but they're communist ideas so they're actually bad because communism is bad

[–] ThunderComplex@lemmy.today 54 points 3 weeks ago

How Americans working 27 hours per day for $8 per month look at you when you suggest something that would benefit them

[–] Renin@hexbear.net 35 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You don't understand! If you press that button every house turns into a gray box! And everybody has to wear the same clothes and drink the same tap water! NOOOOO

[–] Soot@hexbear.net 24 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Me in my guaranteed grey box, clothing, and water instead of worrying about enforced poverty comfy-cool Hell yeah

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 31 points 3 weeks ago

This hurts the propaganda narrative that "communism bad"!

[–] orlando@hexbear.net 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

what are the comments like?

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] orlando@hexbear.net 15 points 3 weeks ago

now see, you could have just said it was on r/neoliberal. now i have to reapply the soap to my brain from when i came across a post literally cheering on the opium wars.

[–] InexplicableLunchFiend@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

old.reddit links no longer work without a reddit account fyi

[–] peeonyou@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

works for me.. i don't regularly visit reddit though so maybe if you hit multiple pages a month it blocks you or something?

[–] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It won't let you view anything with a VPN while not logged in so I'm just not using it anymore

[–] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's odd because I can still view old without vpn / account

[–] PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They are likely A/B testing this in different regions or user agents or something. Expect it to be the new normal.

[–] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

Might be some AB testing still idk

[–] QuietCupcake@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

If anyone still wants to read reddit without needing to post or vote, just use one of the frontends (similar to xcancel/nitter for x/twitter), they still work and you don't have to give any traffic to reddit itself. I have a redirect extension to make any reddit link go to a frontend, for example the link above automatically takes me to https://redlib.catsarch.com/r/neoliberal/comments/1vbraiy/houses_are_for_living_not_for_speculation_is/ That way you can still see what's on the original reddit link with most of the benefits of an old.reddit link without actually having to, you know, actually visit that cesspit.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 weeks ago

Once again the "good things are communism" crowd doing our work for us.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago

So I'm guessing an article like this is trying to imply that China is "lying" about this, without outright stating, just implying that this is a "slogan" and like any political slogan in the west, it is meaningless and will not actually effect policy at all.

I do wonder how they square the circle of an "evil dictator" who doesn't need to come up with empty political slogans to win re-election making up slogans anyway. I guess the goal isn't to get people to seriously consider it, it's to just give them a knee-jerk reaction of "this is an evil Chinese lie!"

[–] Feed_el_Castro@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Some chad on the 8th of July this year uploaded on the article right under Xi a graph of housing price going down in China lmfao

[–] Krinkil2705@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

What's next, you're going to tell me that the ruling party of the People's Republic of China is called Communist Party of China?

By the way, why the Ecuadorian flag though?

[–] Soot@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

It's from a state visit to Ecuador. I guess it was chosen because it was the most contemporaneous photo to when he supposedly coined the term.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

Link or lib

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

porky-scared-flipped but I wanted to profit off exploiting the Chinese market!

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

Absolute paypig mentality.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago

I got bad news for you about "Mass killing of landlords".

[–] Horse@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

i think the western left should lean into this "[good thing] is literally communism" stuff from chuds, even if it isn't necessarily correct tbh


[–] AmarkuntheGatherer@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

Well of course. One cannot conceive that everything to do with communism isn't ontologically bad and remain a liberal.