Welcome to the official Anti-AI Alliance (AAA)!
My name is the Anti-AI Leader, and in case you haven’t guessed, I am the leader of this community for people as disgruntled and disillusioned with AI as I have become!
By joining the Anti-Ai Alliance, you are entering a space to freely express your true distain towards all things Artificial Intelligence (AI). And it’s not even exclusive to people who don’t use AI at all — users of AI are just as welcome to sign up and discuss the issues with AI in the world.
Our only rule is to follow the very basic of the fediverse’s common rules (I.e. no spam, no porn, etc.) Other than that, you may post whatever you like, though we do strongly encourage you to keep the discussion focussed on distain for/the negative aspects of AI. Discussion on the (potential) positive aspects of AI are also welcome, but may be subject to scrutiny/open debate.
Many thanks and welcome, The Anti-AI Leader
The reason an LLM cannot become AGI is that it is neither [intelligence] nor [an imitation of intelligence]. [Intelligence] is the [unique thinking process] of living organisms. [Language] is a simple tool. It is a tool for talking with others, and a tool for [thinking] that talks with oneself. There are already scholars who recognize these problems, but under [power] and [capital], they are losing the power of speech.
If you’ve achieved AGI why can it still not answer very niche questions the way a person would?
The bottom must be falling out a lot quicker than I thought if Clammy Sammy is already claiming AGI.
Sam Altman has a lying problem. Birds of a feather with the orange pedophile
Ben Shapiro for example
Subpar mistake-riddled hallucinations are actually generally intelligent in comparison to ai bros
lol true dat
“We achieved AGI”
Oh, what wishful thinking these delusional people subject themselves to 🙄
We promise this time