im sorry. im sorry. I meant to say americans soon won't have retirments thanks to ai.
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2026
36 points (100.0% liked)
Boycott US
2588 readers
67 users here now
Overview:
The community dedicated to boycotting the US until they stop fascism, restore full democracy and start following international law.
Americans have a moral obligation to resist Donald Trump and project 2025 at every turn.
America is a flawed democracy currently being ruled by oligarchs. Stop the backslide! Dont let America become the next Hungary.
America needs to challenge the court rulings of citizens united v. fec and shelby county v. holder, protect the media, implement independent district drawing, and the single transferable vote so they don't end up having people stay home in life-changing elections because they cannot vote for their favourite candidate.
Join 50501.chat to fight back!
Related communities:
Boycott:
!buycanadian@lemmy.ca
Activism:
!antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
That is because all the data centres consuming all the electricity and water to generate heat and will make the world unliveable for humans.
We won’t survive to retirement!
In other words, spend your money now, peons, to top up our bank accounts so we can pay to replace, repress and marginalize you. Then we won't have to worry about you or your retirement.
Sure AI and robots could take over manufacturing, but it doesn't make abundance magically. Resources are still finite, power generation to build abundance is still a problem. They are just talking nonsense to send share prices up.
Sure AI and robots could take over manufacturing, but it doesn't make abundance magically.
And even if it did , the owners of those AI operated factories aren't going to voluntarily share that abundance with the general population.
Yeah we'd have to move to citizen owns manufacturing, and can't see the current capitalists giving up their stake
listen i know you took the article name verbatim… but at no point, and i mean at no point was he “ripped” over anything. someone agreeing with everything you said is not ripping someone… i don’t know what ripping someone would entail exactly, but it aint it.
listen i know you took the article name verbatim…
Not quite. Obviously no one on 'Fox News' is going to say or ask anything with any intelligence. The "ripped" was a social media response; and I stop reading (MSM) articles when I see algorithmic social media posts. I posted this article because it's an example of how disconnected from reality and/or completely lying Chump's regime is. I believe many intelligent people did 'rip' this idiot for his idiotic line, so the headline is truthful
it’s a distinction with out meaning. every opinion on the face of the earth is “ripped”.
but it doesn’t matter because i don’t hold you to the title of the article. i am blaming the authors of the article itself
blamed, smashed, cooked, slapped, ripped. it’s all derided as useless news marketing
Journalism is so dead (killed, really), eg tech journalism that parrots industry press releases verbatim even when they're BS, that I would rather a headline flag a questionable (or worse) statement as such with "blamed, smashed, etc." than present it as truth, like "Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent Says Americans Soon Won't Need Retirement Savings Thanks To AI". I'm moving on