this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2026
25 points (93.1% liked)

No Stupid Questions

49114 readers
782 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oil and Gas get massive subsidies every year, but a huge part of it are the very popular heating oil subsidies that keep people alive in the winter. Could these be reduced or replaced if instead the government gave money towards families purchasing electric heaters and spending their money on that?

Edit: USA but i assume the problem is not uniquely ours

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes, actually. Up here in Canada we've been running subsidies for electric heat-exchangers (think like an air conditioner that can work in the opposite direction when it's cold) for a couple years now. It is absolutely possible to offset oil subsidies with electric subsidies.

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

Yup, I'm almost through the process right now. $0 cost to me (they're paying me a $250 bonus as well). My home is more than 30 years old, contrary to what another comment said about the feasibility of such a program in the US. It's definitely possible in Canada!

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes rebates on heat pumps, especially inexpensive air to air heat pumps drive adoption. They are efficient and now work in almost any climate.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

mmm...so they claim. I know people with heat pumps who needed to install secondary heating. Entirely depends on house size.

[–] timroerstroem@feddit.dk 5 points 6 days ago

Of course it depends on the house; just like you wouldn't put a moped engine in a tank, a heat pump needs to be sized for the space to be heated (or cooled).

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 6 days ago

Not just size, location. The best heat pumps stop working at around -20. Where I live it gets colder than that for a few days every couple years so I must have secondary heating.

The common heat pump in the US is only good to 25. There is no reason for this, but I don't know how to fix it.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

If you're installing the right sized heat pump for the space you're heating, they're great. If you try to heat Buckingham Palace with a space heater, you're going to have a bad time.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The other thing we need to do is investigate why they charge so much to install heat pumps. I can buy a mini-split for around $1500 (depending on size), but they will charge me $4500 to install it - which seems unreasonable for the labor.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Because there are inevitably licensing and especially permit application costs, the major cost there being the time and aggravation required to get the permit from your local authority which is usually an intentionally dysfunctional Kafkaesque bureaucratic edifice to hell that makes the DMV look like the teacup ride at Disney World.

Fun fact: In my county you are required to pull a permit (with a three to six month typical application wait time) to "install" any heating or cooling equipment, which technically also includes plug-in space heaters and window mounted air conditioners. To rub salt in the wound, you also need to pull a new permit to "uninstall" said equipment, that is to say to unplug it and put it away for the season. Yes, the system is certainly working as designed! (You also need a permit to install or replace a water heater. I'm sure every homeowner with a water tank that just blew and is now standing in a basement 12" deep in water with every other resident of the house screaming at them that they can't take a shower is absolutely thrilled at that prospect. I predict the compliance rate with both of these requirements is as close to zero as mathematics will allow.)

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

because it takes a lot of labor to install them.

that's a low estimate. my estimate was $10,000 to install it for a single condo unit. I've seen many as high as 30-40K for mid-sized homes.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If a single person working alone can install them in a weekend - which happens all the time - a pro who has experience in doing this often should be able to do it for $1000 or less. It is a lot of labor but not more than $4000 worth. At least not the normal case.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

ok, so why don't you go around installing them for $1000?

seems like there is a big market for it, no?

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

installing a heat pump is a one-day job, even with just one person. people deserve to be paid for their labour, but $400+/hr is excessive

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Yes, my state has incentives for heat pump installs and a special electric rate for heat pump users (for those who heat with electric only)

I got a smaller incentive for installing a heat pump in my family room but still keeping my gas furnace. Electricity is pretty expensive here so the tradeoff is about 45°F. Above that the efficiency of the heat pump wins out, but colder than that the furnace is cheaper.

I did try the heat pump when it was cold, and it still produced a respectable amount of heat at 20°F

[–] rain_enjoyer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Resistive heating is a waste of energy. If you people can use your AC units as heat pumps, then we're getting somewhere, if your grid can survive that

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago

An AC unit is a heat pump. The heat is pumped out.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If the grid can run the AC it should be able to handle the heat pumps, arent they basically the same machine?

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 2 points 6 days ago

Almost, but the temperature difference is generally much greater in winter than summer meaning there is more demand for energy in winter. Also solar (and sometimes hydro) power is less effective in winter. Both factors mean that a grid that can handle summer might not be able to handle winter heat.

Remember, the above are factors. Your local grid's exact energy mix matters here, some will have no problems.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It could help but gas heat is cheaper per BTU than heat pumps in most of the USA due to low gas prices caused by a glut of gas from the fracking boom.

[–] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This would be one barrier. Hopefully the government could justify the cost differences in light of the climate crisis. With the conflict in Iran, the cost of oil is rising anyway.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Definitely not likely under the current drill baby drill administration, but energy wise it would be the smarter play for energy security.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

No, because they cost too much. Heat Pump installation costs 30K in my city.

How are you going to make that affordable for poor folks w/o a massive subsidy? like 25K? much cheaper to give oil subsidies that cost a thousand bucks per family.

They already offer subsidies in my state, but they are like 5K, which means they benefit rich people who can afford the 30K price tag, and wait a year or two to see the rebate on their taxes. Just like with electric cars, overwhelming helps wealthy folks.

electric heaters are also horrible inefficient compared to fossil fuels. electric heating has much higher costs than oil and is far less efficient.

You'd need some sort of massive federal program to massively expand production and installation to bring costs down so they became affordable for average people.

Also a large number of homes can't accept heat pumps at all. They are basically need to be on oil/gas heat, or be demolished/refurbed entirely for a heat pump system to work for them. Heat pump installation in my city is usually done during a gut renovation.

[–] frischkaesbagett@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

electric heaters are also horrible inefficient compared to fossil fuels. electric heating has much higher costs than oil and is far less efficient.

Wait until you hear about the efficency(Coefficient of perfomance) of heatpumps.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I know all about heat pumps. I'm a homeowner. the tech has been around for decades but it wasn't usable in cold climates until recently when it became efficient enough to perform at below freezing temps.

But good ole lemmy doesn't like facts of reality and it's difficulties being discussed. they'd rather think real world problems can just magically be solved by good intentions, because they don't have much real life experience.

it thinks 50 year problems can be solved in 6 months if you just 'do it'. when realistically upgrading everyone to heatpumps would take 50+ years, and by then there will be better tech anyway.