this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
18 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

9366 readers
215 users here now

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Does this mean there’s less food waste, people growing more of their own food, people getting food from somewhere other than grocers, or just less overall food consumption?

[–] ignominous_wombat@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It means people are less able to afford the current price of food and the food that they are buying is either cheap to produce or cheap to purchase (or both, I suppose), so the overall actual profit for grocery stores and food producers is less than the expected profit.

In essence, they're upset consumers aren't choosing to spend money they don't have on junk they don't need. Also worth discussion are the questions of whether or not they're hedging their bets that this isn't a long-term downward trend and what they will do if it doesn't reverse course.

[–] TiredTiger@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Declining sales would probably lead to more waste, as unsold perishable food is thrown away.

I would suspect declining food consumption and rising demand at food banks.

I can't read the article though.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

It means depression time

[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 1 points 1 week ago

So that means the food companies are going to rise prices again to make up for the number dropped I'm sure. You know rather than reducing the fraud thet blamed on "inflation".