this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2026
70 points (98.6% liked)

World News

57354 readers
1780 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

German centre-right politician Jens Spahn has been accused of double standards, after he revealed he and his husband had become parents using a surrogate mother in the US.

Surrogacy is banned in Germany - a policy firmly backed by his Christian Democrat party, and several years ago by Spahn himself.

[–] danielfm123@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

Law is for the masses, not the the elites. They have different rules.

[–] ranslite@pie.dasneuland.de 23 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] jupyter_rain@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] banause@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In den USA sagen wir "welp", besonders im Mittleren Westen. Ich glaube, das bedeutet "tja". Vielleicht nicht, aber klingt es angemessen.

[–] banause@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago

Prettty much spot on. 😁

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] banause@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago

Machse nix.

[–] Konaber@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If that is the thing that brings Spahn down I don’t know to laugh or cry.

That guy should have resign long ago. (The mask affair!?)

[–] AAA@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

You mean he should be in prison for a long time.

[–] Mihies@programming.dev 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Typical christian hypocrisy.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

TIL surrogacy is illegal in Germany. What the fuck?

[–] nooch@lemmy.vg 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Most leftists in Europe wtf's the US for having legal surrogacy

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Having babies isn't the problem in the US. The nutcases will be fine with IVF, surrogates, etc., for example, but a vasectomy or birth control pills are a "no go" because that's "not God's plan".....like IVF apparently is?

It's when you DON'T want to have babies (be gay, abortion, no kids couple, single person) that suddenly it's a problem.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why is surrogacy criminalized in Germany, France, Italy, etc?

[–] Marternus@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Numerous ethical questions have been raised with regards to surrogacy. They generally stem from concerns relating to social justice, women's rights, child welfare, bioethics and societal traditional values. In german media mostly the women's rights concerns are mentioned. There seems to be no short answer to your question.

[–] nomadjoanne@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

This. Is actually don't necessarily agree with the ban but it's an ethical question that has gained more traction in Europe than North America and is generally considered a leftist issue here.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I can appreciate that, but could you be more specific? Many in the US would see it as a positive for women's rights to be able to have a surrogate baby, for example. And having a baby via surrogacy is so expensive that generally the parents are well off enough that they can provide for a child and want to do so.

[–] Marternus@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

By degrading women to purchasable "baby producers", commercial surrogacy has been accused by feminists of commodifying women's bodies in a manner akin to prostitution. Also creating a commercial market for human bodies is inherently exploitative. Some argue that commercial surrogacy strips birthmothers of their natural rights. Most countries consider the birthmother (not necessary the biological mother) to be the legal mother unless she freely chooses to put her child up for adoption (without coercion or payment).

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

By denying women who are willing to provide that service (for the right price), you are also denying all gay couples the right to have children related to them, which I would argue is actually the real reason, and the “it degrades women” thing is just a bullshit cover for homophobia and incel/eugenics culture.

“Don’t let the gays reproduce and spread their degeneracy” etc etc

[–] Marternus@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For me this sounds a bit paranoid. We dont live in a homophobic society anymore so I don't think that this is the main reason for most people who are against surrogacy. Gay married couples can adopt children here, its not easy (as its not easy in general to adopt children) but its possible.

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

I live in America in 2026.

I have good reason not to trust a government that makes rules about women’s bodies right now.

[–] newton@feddit.online 1 points 2 weeks ago
[–] tal@lemmy.today -4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

"Politicians who set standards for others must be measured by them too," said Marion Rosin, a Christian Democrat in Thuringia and part of the Women's Union. "If that credibility is gone, resignation is a matter of consequence."

Naturally. I imagine that if Marion Rosin could be shown to have purchased any product originating in another country with different labor laws than in Germany and operating in accordance with the labor laws of that country rather than German ones, that she would certainly herself resign and end her own political career. As a matter of principle, perhaps Ms. Rosin would care to show us, say, the tags on the items of her wardrobe?

[–] MohamedMoney@feddit.org 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Well, playing devils advocate here: your comparison lacks. Buying foreign products well within the free market system, in which her party beliefs.

Also describing the birth of a human as a product is a choice.

[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

Playing devils advocate as well, the argument would also be stronger, if her party simultaneously worked for better labour laws in Germany.

She's in the wrong party to be accused of that.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

She's only concerned with her party's stance. And as good Christians her party is in full support of child slaves producing her clothes.