this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
13 points (93.3% liked)

science

27883 readers
348 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DrBanjo@reddthat.com 8 points 3 hours ago (3 children)
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 2 points 43 minutes ago

Seriously, I already have to put my monitors on nearly the lowest brightness as it is. So tired of extreme bright lighting. Especially offices.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 hours ago

Could be useful if you want to watch TV outside in the sun 😂

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WlFVPnGEb8o

[–] MalReynolds@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

But marketers must have number go up! Moar Candles!

Seriously, more efficiency is always good, but does anyone actually test monitors for low brightness performance, how good is the color at 100 nits, 50 nits, 10 nits, how low can they go? It's like reviewers have totally forgotten that dark rooms exist.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I mean, bright sunlight is the worst case for contemporary displays, so you usually don't have that. And you don't want to stare in a lamp for most of the time.

I usually have to help with xrandr --brightness and --gamma, because the darn thing is still too bright on it's lowest setting. What's important for me is therefore contrast, not brightness.