this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2026
595 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

86864 readers
3225 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 91 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Would be nice, if it was USB by default and Ethernet/Wifi just a module you attach. For most private users, the IoT part of printers is actually a security hazard. Especially for such a portable device.

Edit: private users

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago

i can’t remember the last job i had with non networked printers. that would only work with very small offices.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

Ethernet by default with an optional WiFi module would be ideal.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 41 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

On the one hand, I'm really excited about this because the printer industry is literally the worst. On the other hand, I haven't printed anything for years, I probably won't use it much/ever.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

I print things still pretty consistently. Random forms that need hard copies to have a wet signature, activity sheets for the kids to color, templates for drilling holes in walls, etc. Make the business a lot less toxic and I think you’ll start seeing printers in more homes again.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Its probably just much cheaper and easier, unless you absolutely have to have color, to go to good will and get a brother laser printer for like 10 bucks.

I got one years ago and its still on the original toner cart it came with, and I print decently often.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 36 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I can’t wait for the laser ink variant!

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Ah, you have one of those electric diesel cars I've been hearing about

[–] N4kt0@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I don’t know of any diesel electric cars, but most diesel locomotives use their diesel engines to generate electricity to run the drivetrain.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago

Or natural gas being called a “green fuel” by German politicians.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Futurama@lemmy.zip 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] firmaments@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It looks really neat! Depending on the price, I might get one :)

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Expect this to be priced like a laser printer. Most inkjet printers are subsidized by cartridge lock in and ink priced higher than platinum by ounce.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Honestly, I don’t mind inkjet as a technology, the quality is plenty good and I don’t give a crap about speed. And as you can see from this design they’re a whole lot more compact. The whole reason I don’t use them is the predatory ink pricing, which this product in theory solves!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll stick with my 15 year old brother laser that's still works just fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Aaand its dependent on HP print cartridges. This is a hard problem but the dependence on HP will probably backfire

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 17 points 3 weeks ago

But you can just refill those yourself. The biggest problem with HP printers is that it times out cartridges, even if there's ink left.

[–] justaman123@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

From what I can tell the print head is built into the cartridge and that's the hard part for printer technology.

But I think you might be right depending only on the hp cartridge will open them up to cease and desist. If they make it also use a cannon cartridge that also has a print head then I think they might be ok

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] barryamelton@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

It is not open source with that license. ~~Pitty~~ Pity.

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

(CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0, the non–open-source part here being NC)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aphroditus@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

As an ESL, I had to look up pitty thinking it has to do with pits

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mlg@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

inkjet

Virtually useless unless it supports non consumer ink cartridges or you buy chinese drop in knockoffs.

And even then only if you need to print graphics/images in high quality.

All hail laser.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

All hail laser.

No love for the 9 pin dot matrix?

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My favorite dot matrix memory is printing a like 400 page Breath of Fire 3 strategy guide on a daisy wheel dot matrix, and it took over night to print and everyone in the house complained about the constant ditditditditditditditditdit

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Bit late now, but a tiny squirt of WD-40 into the ribbon cartridge often got you another few hundred pages out of it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] warm@kbin.earth 12 points 3 weeks ago

For a reasonable price and good reviews, this could be my next printer.

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

I don't care how "open source" the printer claims to be. Both hardware and software belong to Belzebub. Such was the dark pact printer makers signed in blood decades ago, and all land shall obey by those words. We shall hit the print button and wallow in torment forever.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a pity that it is using the worst printheads available on the market, the HP disposable ones. Good for up to ten prints I guess

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 weeks ago

Looks nice! I want it. I don't print allot. But i need it to work with linux.

[–] Lanvjscdlk@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's cool, but "It uses refillable HP cartridge bodies – HP 63 in the US and HP 302 in Europe" worries me. I used to have a high-end inkjet for art prints, and then they discontinued the ink cartridges. You can still technically get them on ebay, but they're at scalpers mark-up. So I don't hold much hope for this lasting in the long run.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Good thing this is just a prototype

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I would be surprised if a cartridge being discontinued would kill an open source project like this. They could switch to a different cartridge.

I'd assume they're doing the one for now because it's cheap-ish and has widespread availability. There's little reason not to expand to other cartridges once the rest of the printer is more stable.

[–] magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

We're 20 years late on this

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago

There is still work to do before it lands in users' hands. The team says it is optimizing the ink-drying system, refining printhead cleaning cycles, improving paper insertion, and trying to boost print speeds. On the software side, work continues on Wi-Fi and Ethernet connectivity, as well as dithering algorithms designed to improve image quality.

Here's the video of it in action:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XB7iAFXCJQM

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Thinking about my most recent desire to have a printer, which I haven't had in many years, I was building a bed, and it would have been nice to have a cut sheet printout to take to the garage. Instead, I used my tablet, which worked well enough.

It's so rare that I use paper for taking notes, I have to track down something to write on, often it's an envelope.

It'd be nice to have a printer around for occasional use, but I'm afraid the ink would dry up between uses.

[–] scrion@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (10 children)

Get a cheap laser printer. The toner won't dry out, and you can get a very reliable printer for cheap. The Xpress series from Samsung was cheap and very reliable. Unfortunately, Samsung does not manufacture printers any more and their printer business was bought by HP. I have no idea how new HP models compare to the old ones.

I'd probably look at Brother, a monochrome laser printer can be had for $120, and Brother generally has a good reputation. If you want to print in color, that'll be more expensive of course. Honestly, I haven't had a color printer in 11 years and I don't miss it, but YMMV.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Having been an it guy for a very long time this is my recommendation to everyone. Buy a cheap laser printer for your home. Ink jet is garbage it will piss you off every time you want to print something, it's a trap. Go with whatever brand you want, but brother is the one I'd recommend most

In my home I have a brother color laser printer, it may have run over $300, I don't recall. But I don't recall because I think I bought it 15 years ago and it still works just fine every time I need to print.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If someone can make an open-source 24 pin dot matrix printer, that would rule.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Dude just get a powder toner laser printer. I've been filling the stock toners in my Lexmark instead of buying ink. Fuck, ink.

load more comments
view more: next ›