this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
90 points (97.9% liked)

politics

30329 readers
1919 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What made the sale stand out is that these things usually happen the other way around. According to the health advocacy group Community Catalyst, as of 2020, the 10 largest Catholic health care systems now “own or control 394 short-term acute care hospitals.” Four of the 10 largest health care systems in the country are affiliated with the Catholic Church. More than 30% of births in the U.S. now happen in a Catholic hospital.

And that’s been a major problem because Catholic hospitals play by different rules, not dictated by what’s best for patients.

Their directives don’t come from medical professionals, but rather the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. And since anything involving contraception is forbidden in the faith, even a normal procedure like tubal ligation isn’t permitted. This rule applies even if future pregnancies would put the woman’s life in danger.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 4 points 16 hours ago

Fuck Catholic hospitals. They're intentionally hard to avoid, and the care is always fucked. I say this as someone who unfortunately had to get two surgeries in a Catholic hospital. This was right after they were caught not caring about the literally oozing and damaged beds in the labor and delivery unit.

No joke: https://www.kiro7.com/news/local/least-its-kind-gross-mattresses-tacoma-hospital-oozing-fluids/JBNFDKLBPNHNFHGYMYG3RQ7EC4/

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 11 points 20 hours ago

A lot of people know that Catholic hospitals won’t perform abortions, but fewer know how radical that policy is. Even if you set aside elective abortions, patients who have ectopic pregnancies (and whose lives are at risk) would be in danger if they went to a Catholic institution.

A normal hospital could give that patient a drug to induce an abortion... or just remove that fertilized egg through surgery. Not Catholic hospitals, though. They might make doctors remove a woman’s entire fallopian tube to prevent something fatal, reducing her ability to get pregnant in the future, even though it’s medically unnecessary, because that’s what their faith dictates.

What if a woman has a miscarriage? That’s already emotionally draining, but Catholic hospitals make things worse. Normal hospitals might induce an abortion to make sure the embryonic tissue is removed from a woman’s body to prevent infection. Not Catholic hospitals. They require doctors to wait until a woman is infected before providing treatment.

What about contraception? Catholic hospitals won’t dispense it. If a victim of sexual assault needs birth control immediately, and a Catholic hospital happens to be the one nearby, it may not help her. If there’s any chance the victim is already pregnant when the hospital sees her, that help is even less likely.

Catholic hospitals also won’t perform vasectomies on men because those would interfere with natural pregnancies in the future.

Nor will they help women who want to get pregnant by using a sperm donor.

They also won’t help couples use a surrogatemother to give birth to their biological child because that would also be seen as “gravely immoral.”

Catholic hospitals are equally awful at the other end of life. What if you’re an elderly person who is dying of a terminal disease, constantly in pain, and eager to end life on your own terms, peacefully, while you are able to make those kinds of decisions? Even in states where euthanasia, or death with dignity, is legal, too damn bad. You will just have to suffer. They will not assist you in those cases.

Got caught up in these types of decisions with my first pregnancy that ended in miscarriage. Fuck the Catholic Church.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

We really need a law prohibiting religious ownership of a medical institution from influencing or deciding what care is permitted

[–] JoeTheSane@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, I feel like blocking @stenAanden@feddit.dk for that image alone.

This reminds me or a minor, mostly friendly argument I had with my cousin one time about religion being a net negative for humanity.

Shit like this is why it's a net negative.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 2 points 19 hours ago

Finally some good fucking news

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago

affiliated

This article misspells "afflicted".

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Link goes to some comment section.

[–] stenAanden@feddit.dk 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Noted and fixed. Thanks for the warning.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Now the post is just a photo?

[–] stenAanden@feddit.dk 1 points 20 hours ago

Uphill battle 😅