this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
354 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

86701 readers
3788 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shittydwarf@piefed.ca 248 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] trijste@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] metermatic26@lemmy.world 97 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

You’d think that something that can be copied that easily by your competitors , wouldn’t be valued at hundreds of millions of dollars.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

It's sort of the problem akin to robbing Ft. Knox. Most people just don't have a bag big enough to carry it all away. The Chinese economy is one of the few big enough to support the kind of multi-billion dollar data centers that can accumulate and process data at scale.

But even beyond that, a lot of the modern underlying technology for AI is in the process of relating the data and inferring the resulting answer. Where Altman's whiners want to claim theft is in the raw data they've (illegally) scraped and compiled. Where Chinese firms have innovated is in the speed and accuracy of aggregating the data and returning useful results.

One reason why Altman keeps saying he needs another trillion dollars for hardware and electricity is that his models are shit and his approach is largely brute-force. His overseas rivals - DeepSeek, Moonshot, Stepfun, etc - have invested far more in the actual logical design of their systems. The end result is the kind of video rendering that rendered Sora obsolete almost as soon as it was released. And the kind of advanced coding that's scaring the shit out of the engineers at Claude and Gemini.

[–] historicaldocuments@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Ft. Knox

Did anyone ever go in there and show the gold? I thought someone campaigned with that as a promise.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 93 points 3 weeks ago

AI copied everyone else's work and now it wants to cry about copying. Sucks to suck.

[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 60 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"How dare you steal what we already stole."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 59 points 3 weeks ago

They’re ripping off our plagiarism machine!!

[–] ShredderFeeder@shredderfood.net 52 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So wait, a technology built on stealing Intellectual Property suddenly has a problem with Intellectual Property theft?

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yes, because most of the stock market is tied to the few AI companies. It's the only thing keeping up the facade of a growing economy. The last thing they need is someone showing investors how unimpressive and easily copied the tech is, especially when they're all looking to go IPO and cash out.

[–] randamumaki@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The copier whines that its copies are being copied by another copier. News at 11.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago

Quite literally the entire history of copyright. Each generation of robber barrons angry at the next generations upstart criminals skimming their rent.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 38 points 3 weeks ago
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 35 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Like other Chinese companies, Alibaba tapped into Anthropic’s technologies through tens of thousands of unauthorized accounts, according to the letter, which was viewed by The New York Times. Then it used the data it collected to train its own A.I. systems. Anthropic asked the lawmakers, who lead a Senate committee that was about to hold a hearing on A.I., to explore ways of curbing China’s distillation.

Lmfao they are complaining about what’s basically the same thing as what they did to people to create their AI in the first place

[–] vane@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I still have logs from Anthropic bot not respecting robots.txt ddosing my home lab and stealing code. Where can I send them ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 weeks ago

Ahem, what they are still doing based on everyone's overloaded webserver logs.

[–] Zos_Kia@jlai.lu 5 points 3 weeks ago

No what the Chinese do is much more ethical because they actually pay for the tokens. Basically anthropic is complaining that companies use and pay for their product :'(

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As long as the Chinese are releasing their AI as open source, I really honestly don't give a shit.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They're releasing it open weighs mostly, not open source necessarily.

Not all that different from the freeware model, where you get a binary that you can run, but you don't really have the building blocks to make it yourself.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, for me, I am very strict about that. If it is not open source, I will not use it.

I'm aware of the difference between open weight models and open source models, and I will not use open weight models because they are not open source.

Before I learned that I should care, I used closed source software and so now have some closed source software that I still use because of the fact that I got used to it and can't really easily get rid of it.

AI is the very first technology where I can draw the line immediately and say I will never use a closed source system.

I have switched to open source software and operating systems as much as possible, but because of the fact that I used operating systems and software before I cared about open source, I still have some dead weight to drag around. And with AI, I'm hoping to avoid that issue.

For example, every application on my phone is open source, except for one, and I find that app useful enough that I cannot get rid of it.

[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

source includes the training data. If i gave someone the full source code of a wasm interpreter and a wasm blob that contains all of the logic of the actual application, with no way of building that blob yourself, and call that open source, I'd be laughed out of the room.

"open source" models usually do exactly this

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] krypt@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago

Kinda like how very AI company in silicon valley was scrambling to figure out Deepseek worked when it released for free?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 29 points 3 weeks ago
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

They take our water, our power, our data, our intellectual property, and our politicians, and sell them back to us as tokens.

Of course they would steal the very meaning of “fairness” and monetize it.

[–] cy_narrator@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Do you know something? When Chinese copy AI they open source it but your American companies would never do that

[–] Korkki@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago

Us strategy is to chase the latest frontier model and while they burn money to get to that economy solving model they just plant to get everybody hooked, so they can ramp up prices later and make mega profits. Chinese just see the AI as a productivity multiplier and expect the money to be made elsewhere, their models are open and their Ai companies work on a loss. US plan really expects that there is eventually A) no competition, and B) their shit can actually be so useful that soon nobody can live without them. Everything the Chinese do is just poison to US AI companies.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 21 points 3 weeks ago

"They're using their plagiarism machine to plagiarize our plagiarism machine!"

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago
[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 weeks ago

Thaughts and prayers

[–] AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago
[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Tiny violin company in shambles again, have a hard time facing demands.

[–] thrillhousedev@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Waaaaaaahhhhhhh 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[–] cmbabul@slrpnk.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

Awwwwwwwwwwwww!!!!! Did somebody get addicted to preferential treatment by the state!?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

ChatGPT the app is not even in the same ballpark as the Chinese ones.

OpenAI treats it almost like personalized social media. It saves everything, so it can pull all sorts of stuff into the context. A bunch of ancillary services are front-and-center. In other words, is sycophantic engagement-maxing. And what its actually doing under the hood is opaque.

The Chinese services I've played with are more "utilitarian." They have some great agent harnesses and tools, but generally its presented as a utility more than a "personal world" like ChatGPT, and what it's using/doing is crystal clear.


In other words, from a service perspective, I find this claim silly. They're diverging, greatly.

I'd dispute it for the underlying LLM, too, but on different grounds.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

AI is based on copying

[–] CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago

Good. Fucking clankers.

[–] treesquid@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

So stop developing for China to steal. Make them develop it and steal it from them instead.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

China copies everything. That's what happens when you outsource. They're gonna start bitching about it now?

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

That is not even correct anymore. China is nowadays in the lead on battery technology in specific and EVs in general anxx dc that lead is home made. The West simply did not care about battery technology that much, as it was considered a low return business. You can't copy that much anymore if you are the technology leader yourself. China is also increasingly outresearching the rest in other fields.

I am not saying that China isn't still copying elsewhere where it isn't technology leader. The US and Japan have historically done the same.

PS: Regarding LLMs, no tears for thiefs being stolen from btw.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago
[–] jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 7 points 3 weeks ago
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

At what point do AI tokens morph into crypto tokens? The ouroboros of bitcoin mining, GPUs, and commerce.

IBM is almost there, with its BobCoins: https://bob.ibm.com/docs/ide/account/bobcoins

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 6 points 3 weeks ago

Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

[–] Marija@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The legal questions are getting interesting tho.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›