this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
347 points (97.5% liked)

Greentext

8447 readers
885 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GhostFace@lemmy.today 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Suppose that I decide to pack up the cat and everything I own and just disappear one day?

I can't do that with a bike.

[–] festnt@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

unless you and your bike are very strong and you have a large cart and some rope

[–] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

One downside I haven't seen mentioned yet is the hassle of having to laboriously lock up your bike front and back, saddle bag, too, so some freaking degenerate won't steal anything that isn't secured. I've had my rear wheel stolen before (who even DOES that?) and am not looking for a repeat.

I love riding my bike and do most trips with it in the summer (shopping, appointments, gym, etc.)

But I envy motorists sometimes who just get out of their car, push the button on their key and everything's neatly locked up.

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

This is the upside of living in a very bike heavy cultured city, I feel like there's so damn many bikes everywhere that no one gives a fuck about my bike. I also have never left it outside overnight.

[–] o0evillusion0o@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 hours ago

Weren’t you paying attention? Bikes are so cheap you can just buy another when it gets stolen.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Friendly reminder that if you only have enough lock to lock your frame and ONE wheel, make sure it's the rear wheel! It is the most expensive of the two to replace.

That said, bike thieves should have their fingers broken.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like drop out wheels were a bad idea. For the number of times you actually want to remove your front wheel I'm happy just having to undo a lug nut. Drop out wheels have made it too easy for bike thieves and they just unhook the wheel and run off before anyone notices what they're doing.

A good compromise would be dropout wheels but they need unique key to unlock the wheel.

[–] glibg@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago

There are locking axles that replace the quick release axles, to do what you described. A couple companies I've heard of (but haven't tested myself):

https://www.pinheadbikelocks.com/ https://hexlox.com/en-ca

[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 4 points 20 hours ago

As a full time car-free person, this is absolutely a valid argument. I'm lucky to live less than 10 minutes away from my job. I could bike there in even less time, but walk anyway specifically because I don't want to deal with these logistics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Worstdriver@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Distance. Carrying capacity Speed

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Hills. If you live near hills bikes don't work too well at least not as transportation, they work more as exercise equipment then.

I've actually got an electric bike and it does solve the hills problem but then it has the it weighs as much as a baby elephant problem. So it's still a pain if you have to lug it on and off the train.

[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

You are seriously underestimating baby elephants :D

[–] Alberat@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

someone compared efficiency and long distance trains are more efficient, but that's it.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Further proof that trains are the ultimate form of transportation. But we all knew this. Choo choo!

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Bring back trains so we can have real suburbs, where you can live in a small town and be a 30 to 45 minute train ride from a city center.

Bike and train could mean never having to deal with owning a car ever again.

[–] Frostbeard@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I use a bike to commute 6.5 km to work and it's not just a good time. I do have a dedicated bike/pedestrian paved path (with few pedestrians, just a lot of other bikes) which is nice.

But in rain it sucks. And in winter it sucks even harder with the cold, and snow and ice. I have studded tires but that adds to the suck as they make you slower. I always have to shower when I get to work. I deliver and pick up in kindergarten, and there is no place to lock the kid trailer, so it adds an extra km to pick up and dump of the trailer at home.

I still use a manual as it gives me some excercise, but an electric bike would solve many of the issues.

And I save money on parking and toll. And bc of traffic I use about the same time.

Nothings perfect

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zaphod@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

If only we had good bicycle infrastructure everywhere 😔

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Anon missed the biggest sin of all:

Monetizable, but only at two or three orders of magnitude less than automobiles.

TL;DR: "He's cheating because he's not spending as much as I am."

They're cheaper in every conceivable way than cars, and that's why the worst people out there hate them. Once you see the systems in place to equate personal validity and social values with what wealth may be extracted, it's impossible to look back. Bikes are effectively a form of protest by way of scaling back one's economic interaction, because of this.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Can only be safely used in good weather.
Collisions will, in fact, fuck you up bad.
Limited cargo space.
Single occupancy.

[–] Tuxman@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)
  1. Try a rain poncho
  2. Two bikes colliding may fuck one up, but death is VERY unlikely
  3. Electric cargo bike
  4. Electric cargo bike

Most arguments against bikes are from people who never even tried to address the issues. It's like "I've seen a BMX and that's ALL there is!"

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Most bike fatalities are car related, though bike on bike deaths do exist.

I was not thinking about discomfort due to rain (wearing glasses does suck in the rain) but slippery conditions. I have taken a bad spill off my bike twice and both times were because of rain.

I guess I don't count e-bikes as bikes. That is a bad mind set on my part.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can only be safely used in good weather.

Just like cars?

Collisions will, in fact, fuck you up bad.

As bad as cars?

Limited cargo space.

Not as limited as you think.

Single occupancy.

Not necessarily.

[–] antonim@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Just like cars?

No, cars can easily be used in much worse weather than bikes.

As bad as cars?

Worse. It may sound surprising, but in a traffic accident being inside a car protects you more than just having a helmet.

Not as limited as you think.

I wonder if that thing is even legal to drive.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Mostly true but I find the price is pretty high nowadays.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 28 points 2 days ago (11 children)

You don't need a carbon road bike to cycle to the supermarket, you're not racing in the tour de france.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (7 children)

It is cool and all, but I don't wanna haul a crap load of tools on a bike

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I love bikes, and don't own a car. But, this is misleading.

Bikes are terrible off road where there are no paths. They're decent if there's a well worn path, as long as there are no exposed roots or big rocks, but if the path isn't well maintained walking is probably better.

Where bikes excel is very flat surfaces. The modern world is filled with those. The problem is that in most places the assumption is that those flat surfaces belong to either cars or pedestrians. Theoretically, in many places, bikes are allowed in the same places as cars most of the time. But, if a biker shares the space with cars, it's just a matter of time before that biker collides with a car. When that happens, the person in the car won't be injured. The biker may be dead.

When a driver hits a car, normally the driver gets off easy. Even if there's evidence of malicious intent, it's almost never treated as manslaughter or even murder. If there's no evidence of malice, it's treated as an "oopsie daisy" and there's virtually no chance that the driver will spend any time in jail or prison.

Finally, bikes aren't treated as important property that the law should protect the way that cars are. Even in places like Amsterdam where biking is one of the most common ways to get around, the canals are filled with bikes that have been stolen and thrown in. If you steal a car and get caught, you're in serious trouble. If you steal a bike, the odds of getting caught are tiny, and if it happens it's not treated as a very serious issue.

Sure, laws can be changed. But, drivers tend to be older and richer. The older they are, the more dependent they are on their cars. So, they almost always manage to defeat any potential changes to the law.

Bikes do give you a lot of freedom, but in a world designed around cars first, it's not as much freedom as you get with a car. Maybe in 50 years it will be different. I hope so.

[–] megrania@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 20 hours ago

Theoretically, in many places, bikes are allowed in the same places as cars most of the time. But, if a biker shares the space with cars, it’s just a matter of time before that biker collides with a car. When that happens, the person in the car won’t be injured. The biker may be dead.

Assuming every cyclist who shares the road will eventually have an accident involving a car is kinda fatalist IMHO, but I guess it depends on where you are ... where I live, bicycles on the road are very common, both in the city and outside.

My typical ways in the city involve a multilane road that doesn't have a bike path yet, and while it can be stressful I don't consider it overly dangerous.

Road cycling is a common pastime here so having bicycles on the country roads is expected, and motorists are required to maintain a certain distance (1.5m), as indicated by many roadsigns along popular roads. They typically comply.

So, yeah, I don't think it's a given and very much the results of cultural attitudes more than anything ...

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

The problem is banks own the majority of cars. Stealing a car is stealing a banks property. The banks have enough money to get pissy about this and make the government do something.

If cars didn't require loans and had entire major industries profiting off them then it's likely cars would be treated like bikes.

[–] Nighed@feddit.uk 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Have definitely seen bike traffic jams in London before, you get a lot more people through though!

I don't have a photo of a big one though ☹️

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 24 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Cars can easily long distances in a short period of timeinn most weather conditions comfortably, allowing the freedom of movement even if it isn't done daily. It is a symbol of long distance freedom on weekends and holidays, not daily commuting.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

Bikes are awesome. Bike infrastructure helps wheelchair users and pullcart users as well.

load more comments
view more: next ›