this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
21 points (78.4% liked)

PC Gaming

14963 readers
618 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 3 points 7 hours ago

All the more reason to use Linux and OnlyOffice or LibreOffice

[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 22 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I have trouble taking piracy enforcement seriously from any company involved in AI tech.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 6 points 7 hours ago

Piracy is only ok if you do it on a big enough scale

[–] Uncle_Ben@fedinsfw.app 14 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Davel23@fedia.io 3 points 6 hours ago
[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 21 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Seems a bit sensationalised but they're only targeting companies selling pirated copies which sounds about right I guess? Your average user who does this isn't gonna be affected.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, they appear to also target individuals.

[–] pycorax@sh.itjust.works 5 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I can't seem to find anything on the article that seems to say so other than, you should just be careful and verify your software. I can't imagine going after tens of thousands of people to be remotely viable.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 2 points 3 hours ago

I agree with you about not being viable for the individual. In the USA there were several scary news stories about people being fine obscene amounts for torrents.

Here is the article, but (manually) summarized to highlight the contrast between individuals and organizations.

The case is a warning for PC retailers, IT service companies, schools, businesses, and everyday laptop users who may not think twice about what is running on their machines.

Under Article 225, a person who commits qualifying copyright infringement can face a fine ...

For companies, the possible exposure is even bigger.

Smaller cases still carry penalties

Not every case becomes a criminal case. In lower-level violations that do not meet the threshold for prosecution, administrative fines may still apply. ...

For unauthorized copying of protected works, fines for individuals range from 5 million to 50 million dong, or about $190 to $1,900 ... For organizations, the fines listed for the same conduct are doubled

[–] notaviking@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

I can just imagine the scene, fortunate son playing in the background as a chopper comes flying in, cut to the scene of thousands of Vietnamese people on their computers peacefully typing in bliss...

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 20 points 18 hours ago

Fuck any criminal treatment for civil copyright whining, but moreover:

Linux is free.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 6 points 15 hours ago

My go-to is to install and see if Microsoft activated it themselves. It's pretty common for enterprise equipment to have a built-in license.

If not, I sell as-is and suggest the user buy a third party license, if they want one.

[–] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 3 points 14 hours ago

[Smooth linuxian whispers]