this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
129 points (98.5% liked)

PC Master Race

21533 readers
266 users here now

A community for PC Master Race.

Rules:

  1. No bigotry: Including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. No NSFW content.
  4. No Ads / Spamming.
  5. Be thoughtful and helpful: especially when new beginners have questions.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 75 points 3 days ago (2 children)

As someone who deals with various windows bullshit on the daily, 8gb for win11 is fine assuming you don't use any applications. If you want to actually use the machine, 16gb is the absolute minimum

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I had to uninstall chrome and switch to edge on my work laptop just to make it usable. 8 is barely enough, if you’re very careful

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Microsoft leadership is a bunch of scumbags.

[–] khanh@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"fine" depends on what you're doing. web browsing? youtube? maybe, just dont open more than 5 tabs. doing literally anything else? no. get 12 gb or 16 gb ram.

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

My rule was 32gb at least. And that was for. At least 10 years

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

I have 16gb and more than 15 tabs causes my computer to studder.

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 20 points 3 days ago (3 children)

next they'll say any ol' hdd is fine, too.

(they are not)

if you ever have to use win11 on a laptop with 4 or 8gb ram and a 2.5in hdd, you'll be inventing new swear words.

[–] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

About halfway through the lifecycle for Windows 10, HDD performance became pure garbage and I genuinely do not know how/why they did that. Something about how they were handling indexing or read operations at idle meant pinning the disk at 100% usage almost all the time and the only solve was an SSD. I hate that shit so much.

[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

I hope they have to rebase their os to win 7 due to ram prices

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean, as long as you pair it with an optane cache drive it should be fine

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

optane was a horrible and ineffective 'solution' to windows and application bloat.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the product was good. But it was too little too late, since nand SSD pricing had already begun to drop. If it had a higher capacity, or lower pricing, or was released sooner it would have been a hit.

I still use one for an os drive in my nas.

[–] adarza@piefed.ca 1 points 2 days ago

the one i still have just an ssd boot for a dietpi (debian mini server), separated from its hdd which is just file storage. as a regular ssd, the modules are 'ok'. a bit slow--and of course very small, but higher endurance. i should never have to worry about it running out of writes in that little mini-server.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I mean maybe, if you aren't running any other softare at all and just staring at your desktop.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah no. I'm at 32 and task manager says that 28+GiB are being used on idle. The sum of everything that appears on task manager doesn't reach 2GiB.

And it's not "the OS is using it because you aren't", because if I do anything demanding, the OS won't give me back that RAM, it'll use the swap instead.

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

You have other problems beyond windows. My laptop has 32gb and it uses like 6.5gb with nothing open on the desktop.

[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is not how this works. The system isn't using all that, I can guarantee that. Even launching a terminal (or any app) as hidden will not make it and its usage appear in taskmgr - I once unknowingly managed to exhaust my 64GB by launching hundreds of terminal sessions withoutever killing them. Try something like sysinternals process manager to see what's actually going on.

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You can guarantee it? Are you a Microsoft Windows developer? In that case, I'd like to fill in a bug report.

When I turn my machine on, without me doing anything at all, task manager would display >20GiB used. I don't have many applications to run at startup. At most iCUE (Corsair keyboard drivers). I don't think iCUE is using 20GiB if RAM.

Then, I open 2-3 vscode instances. Each instance launches its own rust-analyzer, since I'm looking at 3 rust projects simultaneously.

Each rust-analyzer instance uses ~3GiB of RAM.

That is enough to reach 100% ram usage and the computer becomes noticeably slower, even if CPU usage is at 7%.

Tell me, Microsoft Windows developer. Why does my machine grind to a halt when I use ~10GiB of RAM, if win11 says that the recommended amount is 16GiB and I have 32? 10+16 = 26. I should have a minimum of 6GiB left. The math ain't mathing.

[–] TheFarm@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Have you tried using the windows debloat tool to get rid of all the AI and garbage that Win11 comes pre-installed with? Might help with the excessive RAM usage on startup.

[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would advise against doing your own math

[–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not only are you a Microsoft developer. Are you also a maths PhD? I thought I was using maths of a level I'm comfortable with. Mainly addition, abstraction, and multiplication if real numbers.

Perhaps I've committed a grave mistake. Please show me where my mistake is.

[–] filcuk@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

You are funny, but no, it's just unnecessary.
Using appropriate tools, such as the aforementioned process explorer, will help you avoid any guesswork.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 9 points 2 days ago

1000% bs. My work pc has 8gb of ram and im always 100%. I hardly get anything done quickly if I open teams which I have to.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Why the fuck does the OS need so much memory?

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Everything always gets bolted on with no consideration for memory footprint. It's basically 2 decades of software inside the memory because if they delete something it breaks.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Mine doesn't, maybe you are using the wrong one?

This was supposed to be a shamless Linux plug, but in order to be useful for some people I'd recommend debloating your Windows installation. I've had good experience with Raphire's debloater.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

I use Linux at home too, but windows at work

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 days ago

M after ricing arch into some ungodly aberration that was never meant to exist in this world.

[–] Stormcrow@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

But you'll definitely want OneDrive, Teams, Edge, Chrome, Adobe and your totally necessary "anti-virus" to run in the background 24/7 right?

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I guess maybe 8GB is fine if all you do is have a browser open with some tabs.. W11 is not RAM friendly.

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd say 8G is fine until you open a browser.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 7 points 3 days ago

and every application today is a browser.

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Windows 10 had a minimum requirement of 2GB RAM, with 4GB recommended for a comfortable experience. Windows 11 bumped that up and then kept needing more as the OS got heavier with every update cycle.

...to 4 GB...

[–] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

I've used Windows 10 with 4GB. It's not a comfortable experience. Neither is Windows 11 with 8GB.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Okay but with 16 gig you have so much room for Activities!

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't worry, soon they will announce that 4GB will probably be fine too, once they discover they need even more RAM for their AI slop farms.

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Windows 11 has a minimum requirement of 4 GB.

[–] Lumidaub@feddit.org 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Why would they knowingly push for better but unnecessary hardware? What do they gain from people buying more RAM than necessary to run Windows?

Edit: wait, they also sell laptops. Duh.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

Nothing. It's not unnecessary. It's very necessary, especially Windows. They're just shifting their perspective because RAM has gotten so wildly expensive.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I thought 32GB was a minimum for the last PC I built 8 years ago.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

How about 2?

load more comments
view more: next ›