this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
286 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

86608 readers
3066 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

She also speaks russian and korean in the movie, I hope it sounded fluent to native speakers too. As someone who doesn't speak those languages it was very convincing.

[–] DougPiranha42@lemmy.world 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As someone fluent in Alien, I can confirm she sounded like gibberish, but the accent was on spot.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

maybe it was a different mathspeak dialect

[–] db2@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

She should really learn Galactic Standard.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Though rarely it has to. Someone speaking multiple entirely different languages usually can't pronounce them all like a native speaker no matter how good they are, so small issues are perfectly acceptable.

It only really becomes a problem when movies try to convince us that it's supposed to be their native language, e.g Scarlet Johansson as the Black Widow - who is supposed to be a Russian spy.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Scarlet Johansson as the Black Widow - who is supposed to be a Russian spy.

Not a particularly good example to pick. She wouldn't be a very effective Red Room spy if she had a native Russian accent she couldn't disguise at all.

Should have picked something more like Tom Cruise... In anything.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm not saying she should have a Russian accent while speaking English - she is a spy, that would be stupid - but that Scarlet Johansson is pretty rubbish at speaking Russian, which her character should be perfectly fluent in as that's her native language.

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 39 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Maybe they should have used AI to write a better script. Or maybe it's so ass because they actually did. Probably the worst film I've seen in the last 5 years, and that's really saying something.

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well now I kind of want to see it! What about it was particularly noteworthy, or was it just the modern "meh" of spectacle without plot?

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This was way worse than the average "bad film" lol. It was completely nonsensical and so full of massive plot holes that it has to be some kind of record. And it wasn't even bad in a fun way, just irritating and dumb unfortunately. Even the CGI sucked...

I would've walked out halfway through the film if I hadn't been there with someone.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

Absolutely this.

The tonal shifts were baffling. I didn’t know if it was supposed to be serious or funny. Like was it campy or bad? I do not know.

I do recall enjoying Blunt’s performance. Her acting is very good. Her dialogue and the script just brought it down though.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Imagine watching the main character, go up to another character and start berating them with listicles of moments in their lives (you as a viewer have no idea of) while simultaneously being annoyed that they feel compulsed to berate the other character with listicles of their lives. Which are supposed to be all these amazing and quiet moments which a strange person shouldn't know. So the other character its getting all teary-eyed while the main character's annoyance resolves into smugness who then cries and screams about all of it. Repeat.

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

so... "I told you aliens were real" ad infinitum?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Interesting. Critics seem to like it alright.

[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca -3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Critics loved copiumheimer

[–] LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

An overwhelming majority of the general public also liked Oppenheimer, so I think you may just be particularly hard to please.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

From everyhing ive seen, its a modern remake of close encounters, but with all the trappings of current year Hollywoo.

CD and special effects feel less magical, its the reason Project Hail Mary felt different. Everyone knew Ryan was acting along side a puppet. Good sci-fi is possible, but reality is too jaded and needs things to be a bit more hopeful.

[–] soratoyuki@piefed.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

From everything I've seen, no they haven't.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My theory is the original ending was super controversial in focus groups. The main characters were basically the next messiah, there was this whole subtext about usurping major religion, destabilizing the world, etc. The ending we got basically abandoned all character development up to that point. There was probably a better ending out there that got scrubbed in favor of a "Let's just kinda play it safe" nothing burger.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

And that is what is ruining cinema now a days. They focus rest everything and make it please everyone so it is just a bland story. Disney is really bad for this.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

No joke, I think it would have that kind of effect if Spielberg was actually using it. Now I have to go back to watch Duel from when he was brimming with ideas and not thoroughly cooked.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's Spielberg, of course it was going to be shit

[–] Hubi@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, he's made some great movies. Just not so much recently.

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Recent = in the past 35 or so years.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Hey, look guys! This guy thinks that popular things aren't good! He plays by his own rules! He's so edgy!

[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It's Spielberg + aliens I would say. It was never good and even less approachable for non-American audiences.

[–] drdiddlybadger@pawb.social 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Its so odd that they even suggested having a machine do it when they already had the actor on payroll. They would've had to post process it and tune it anyway.

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 19 points 1 month ago

Tells me that AI was already ingrained in the process. Reeks of "well, we're doing it here & here, why not with her voice, too?"

[–] deacon@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What's crazy about this, at least to me, is that you have in Emily Blunt one of the best at using and changing her voice in her acting. I always think of her and Tom Hardy as the best in this area. It's like they are voice acting on top of their normal acting. That's a poor way to describe it, but it's the best I can do.

I don't want to take anything away from any other aspect of Emily Blunt's toolkit as an actor. But using AI for any aspect of her voice acting is like trading a Bentley for a fucking Daewoo.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Daewoo.

Still never forget how bland those cars looked in the 90s.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The Chevy Spark is uglycute, and a Daewoo in origin. So they tried to gloss up their design game… but made frog cars.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Look up Daewoo Racer. It was a hard sell in my country at a time when Japanese sedans dominated.

[–] BrambinagStoneboots@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And that is a licensed version of the Opel Kadett E, after it was no longer produced in Germany.

The hatchback version of this was sold in Germany with a little facelift, basically all corners were a bit more rounded, but you could still recognize a somewhat familiar shape.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago

This is now way off thread, but all the proportions look wrong on that car.

Here's a very boxy car where the lines flow together and it aged well (1988):

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh man, I remember seeing how Bentleys were much nicer than Daewoos too. Has anyone else noticed that?

[–] Krelis_@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Imagine what Usain Bolt could do on a Segway

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

E bout some land, and E bout a whi fff. - Tom Hardy in Taboo

[–] couldhavebeenyou@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

He offered it to trick her into giving it her absolute best

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Her surname checks out. Like, "respectfully sorry, I can't use AI. I'm better than that."

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

People who've never done any acting probably can't appreciate the silliness of this. It's not a bold, noble stance against AI, it's a normal conversation between a director and an actor about whether some post-production work will be necessary, and the actor says, "No, I'll just do it." People here apparently have no idea how completely normal and inconsequential this is. Maybe Emily Blunt is already an anti-AI icon for other comments, IDK, but any actor could have had this convo without having any opinion on AI.

[–] llii@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago

I saw it today and I liked it. Reminded me of arrival and Contact.

[–] Miller@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I can do it, look here 'Abghcracgrasaaab take me to your leader hfjjgbeef for mash get smash'.

[–] luipaard0011@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 month ago
[–] AngryRobot@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fuck Speilberg. He's on the list.