105
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tentphone@lemmy.fmhy.ml 36 points 1 year ago

That's the same as two cups of coffee, and pretty standard for an energy drink (slightly more than Monster original, slightly less than 5-hour energy)

[-] MicroWave@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Advertising itself as zero sugar and vegan, the neon-colored cans are among a growing number of energy drinks with elevated levels of caffeine; in PRIME’s case, 200 milligrams per 12 ounces, equivalent to about half a dozen Coke cans or nearly two Red Bulls.

[-] thrawn21@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Eh, for all their advertising, Red Bulls are actually on the weaker side for energy drinks.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

So like half of a Reign?

[-] brcl@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Can you convert this to espresso shots? I typically have 8 each morning. If this is more affordable I may switch!

[-] Cmot_Dibbler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Internet says 512mg of caffeine in 8 shots of espresso. I love coffee too but good lord my dude. 😬❤️💥💀

[-] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That is a lot of caffeine to start the day. Not here to drag on another's drug use, but there is validity in weening yourself down from time to time.

[-] gila@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's just a caffeine supplement packaged and ready to drink, if affordability is your concern just buy a powder supplement and mix it yourself. There's multiple brands with flavored options that'll give you a drink exactly like Prime for like 25c per serve

[-] 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah comparing to Coke is kinda dumb

[-] 567PrimeMover@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I was curious what a "cup of coffee" is, and according to healthline that would be about 8oz (~227ml) which could deliver anywhere from 70-140mg of caffeine depending on type of coffee and how you brew.

So if you drink a lot of coffee (like me) you consume a shit ton of caffeine... damn.

[-] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Why don't products containing caffeine have to show that just like fat/carbs/protein?

I kind of would like to know if I have a drink and it's going to fuck my sleep pattern for a week.

[-] greendakota99@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I think they do, however it is almost always smaller text somewhere not in the Nutrition Facts section.

[-] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Must be a UK thing, I'm checking pepsi cans and bottles, nothing only "it has caffeine" 😔

[-] Khan@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

It's not in that same section, but I find pretty much everything but coffee and tea lists the amount near it.

[-] drdalek13@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Gfuel cans are literally 300mg

[-] freddy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Rockstar fruit punch is 240mg. Monster sells drinks that have 300mg - idk why they making this a big deal.

[-] Roggie@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

Used to love gfuels but they stopped selling them where I live

[-] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

So.. 180mg? That's about standard for an energy drink. 130 to 180.

[-] codRL@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

Yep. I didn’t read the article but this is indeed very standard for an energy drink.

[-] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I hate the trend of putting more and more caffeine into energy drinks. Just give me some taurine and L-Theanine.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

The weird part is the lacking regulations for showing what amount of caffeine is appropriate for a normal daily value, as they do with all the other components of foods and drinks. That should be the thing they update to apply to all energy drinks.

The excuse used is that caffeine isn't a nutrient, but that sounds like one of the reasons on why it should be included on the labels. Some labels do include it, but in a much less prominent way, as if they're trying to hide it. The regulations should make caffeine be the required most prominent thing on labels for energy drinks, coffee, ect where the caffeine is the literal point of them.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There is no recommended daily value of caffeine. If you really pressed a dietitian, they would probably say zero.

[-] paperclipgroove@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

I'm conflicted on this.

The adult side of me wants to have this info on labels/menus so I can make informed choices.

The side of my that used to be in high school knows that kids will buy the highest number for bragging rights among friends.

[-] pizza_rolls@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

They can already do that though? They show the mg on the label just not the recommendation

[-] sincle354@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah but when you have a label that says "This can has 40% of daily recommended caffeine", teens will read that more than the 3pt font we now have. 200mg is an abstract value to humans, while taking enough energy drinks for 200% daily caffeine is a dare.

[-] Hal@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Prime Hyrdration seems, to me, to be the one popular amount kids. It contains zero caffeine.

[-] jtskywalker@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Tastes good too

[-] EmperorHenry@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Right on! Then look into redbull, monster and all those other energy drinks too.

[-] Roggie@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

That’s actually a little less than the Starbucks triple shots I drink every morning with 225mg

[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Logan Paul fucking sucks. That said, Reign has 300 mg caffeine per 16 oz and Bang has 320mg. 200 over 12oz is less than both.

[-] Debo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The bullshit article claims that parents were thinking they were buying they kids juice.

Juice.

[-] Necromnomicon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

TBF there is a PRIME "hydration drink" too akin to Gatorade. They are both labeled the same, and I can see a parent confusing them. No matter what vessel I buy a Coke in, it's still the same beverage. Why would anyone assume differently with PRIME?

[-] dethb0y@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Our tax dollars at work. You'd think the FDA would have more important things to do with their time and resources than investigate a product that literally lists it's ingredients on the side.

[-] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Or a product thats nearly the same as every other energy drink

[-] dethb0y@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Now that's not true, it tastes worse and has less caffeine than many popular brands.

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
105 points (94.1% liked)

News

23263 readers
2796 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS