this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
105 points (94.1% liked)

News

36557 readers
2661 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tentphone@lemmy.fmhy.ml 36 points 2 years ago (3 children)

That's the same as two cups of coffee, and pretty standard for an energy drink (slightly more than Monster original, slightly less than 5-hour energy)

[–] 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah comparing to Coke is kinda dumb

[–] 567PrimeMover@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

I was curious what a "cup of coffee" is, and according to healthline that would be about 8oz (~227ml) which could deliver anywhere from 70-140mg of caffeine depending on type of coffee and how you brew.

So if you drink a lot of coffee (like me) you consume a shit ton of caffeine... damn.

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why don't products containing caffeine have to show that just like fat/carbs/protein?

I kind of would like to know if I have a drink and it's going to fuck my sleep pattern for a week.

[–] greendakota99@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think they do, however it is almost always smaller text somewhere not in the Nutrition Facts section.

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Must be a UK thing, I'm checking pepsi cans and bottles, nothing only "it has caffeine" 😔

[–] Khan@feddit.nl 4 points 2 years ago

It's not in that same section, but I find pretty much everything but coffee and tea lists the amount near it.

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So.. 180mg? That's about standard for an energy drink. 130 to 180.

[–] codRL@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 years ago

Yep. I didn’t read the article but this is indeed very standard for an energy drink.

[–] drdalek13@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Gfuel cans are literally 300mg

[–] freddy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Rockstar fruit punch is 240mg. Monster sells drinks that have 300mg - idk why they making this a big deal.

[–] Roggie@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

Used to love gfuels but they stopped selling them where I live

[–] bl4ckblooc@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I hate the trend of putting more and more caffeine into energy drinks. Just give me some taurine and L-Theanine.

[–] Silverseren@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The weird part is the lacking regulations for showing what amount of caffeine is appropriate for a normal daily value, as they do with all the other components of foods and drinks. That should be the thing they update to apply to all energy drinks.

The excuse used is that caffeine isn't a nutrient, but that sounds like one of the reasons on why it should be included on the labels. Some labels do include it, but in a much less prominent way, as if they're trying to hide it. The regulations should make caffeine be the required most prominent thing on labels for energy drinks, coffee, ect where the caffeine is the literal point of them.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

There is no recommended daily value of caffeine. If you really pressed a dietitian, they would probably say zero.

[–] paperclipgroove@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm conflicted on this.

The adult side of me wants to have this info on labels/menus so I can make informed choices.

The side of my that used to be in high school knows that kids will buy the highest number for bragging rights among friends.

[–] pizza_rolls@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They can already do that though? They show the mg on the label just not the recommendation

[–] sincle354@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah but when you have a label that says "This can has 40% of daily recommended caffeine", teens will read that more than the 3pt font we now have. 200mg is an abstract value to humans, while taking enough energy drinks for 200% daily caffeine is a dare.

[–] Hal@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Prime Hyrdration seems, to me, to be the one popular amount kids. It contains zero caffeine.

[–] jtskywalker@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Tastes good too

[–] EmperorHenry@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Right on! Then look into redbull, monster and all those other energy drinks too.

[–] Roggie@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

That’s actually a little less than the Starbucks triple shots I drink every morning with 225mg

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Logan Paul fucking sucks. That said, Reign has 300 mg caffeine per 16 oz and Bang has 320mg. 200 over 12oz is less than both.

[–] Debo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The bullshit article claims that parents were thinking they were buying they kids juice.

Juice.

[–] Necromnomicon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

TBF there is a PRIME "hydration drink" too akin to Gatorade. They are both labeled the same, and I can see a parent confusing them. No matter what vessel I buy a Coke in, it's still the same beverage. Why would anyone assume differently with PRIME?

[–] dethb0y@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Our tax dollars at work. You'd think the FDA would have more important things to do with their time and resources than investigate a product that literally lists it's ingredients on the side.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Or a product thats nearly the same as every other energy drink

[–] dethb0y@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Now that's not true, it tastes worse and has less caffeine than many popular brands.