this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
460 points (99.4% liked)

World News

57334 readers
885 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Nearly 55% of voters in Switzerland on Sunday rejected an initiative championed by the top right-wing party to cap the rich Alpine country’s population at 10 million, early results showed.

The populist Swiss People’s Party, which has the most seats in parliament, has stirred up and fostered anti-migration sentiment over the years, notably about an influx of workers from the neighboring European Union.

Some have dubbed the proposal a “Swiss Brexit” because it could jeopardize Switzerland’s deep ties to the European Union anchored by deals that foster economic growth, cultural ties and cross-border travel, among other things. Switzerland is not one of the EU’s 27 member states, but it is all but surrounded by four of them

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] justlemmyin@lemmy.world 134 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Aww yep, good to hear only 45% support 'capping' the people they don't like, phew.

[–] sours@lemmy.world 75 points 1 month ago (5 children)

It's so fucking embarrassing to be a human being and watch dumb shit like this and authoritarianism growing around the world.

[–] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So many countries started because of this kind of shit I've human history, but we're all outta globe to pack our shit and start a proper country with blackjack and hookers...🫤

[–] possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

somehow you left this comment five times

[–] NOPper@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago

Holy shit...appreciate the heads up! Its funny too, the top one is the only one with the spelling correction edit. No idea what happened but thanks for pointing it out!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TheDuke@europe.pub 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, you have to see it in a bit of a context. Many votes in Switzerland are concluded on a much tighter scale. Sometimes stuff gets accepted or declined by 50.5% or even less. 55% against the initiative is pretty decent, especially when it looked like it would pass for a long time. Me personally I would have liked to see 95% against this crap, but this has never happened on any matter that was voted on, so...

Also, the cities and suburbs, with the supposed "problems of immigration" right in front of their doorstep, all declined the initiative. It was the country side and small communities that aren't even affected by immigration, that voted for it. This shows once again, that fear is a powerful tool to mobilize masses. Thankfully it didn't work this time but we gotta stay alert and fight the narrative of fearmongering every single day.

Source: Me, I'm Swiss.

[–] 8uurg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Another indication that interacting with others from outside your bubble is the best vaccine against right wing rethoric regarding immigration: in rural areas and suburbs such interactions tend to be much rarer than within the city...

[–] Eril@feddit.org 18 points 1 month ago

My thoughts exactly. Everyone is like "the Swiss have spoken and are clearly not supporting capping the population". And I feel like that is not really showing the reality...

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 40 points 1 month ago (31 children)

What is it with the right wing populists and their obsession with immigration? All they ever do is state the immigration is bad, and that it's the root of all evil, provide no evidence for the claim, and then just keep parroting the claim and infinitum until either elected or arrested/shot.

I get that they're racist but they're bordered by the likes of France, who exactly is it that's coming over that they have a problem with?

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

Basically it's a way to distract from actual political issues, and shift blame to people that have a hard time defending themselves.

It's a very old technique but ususally works very well. The Romans used to execute Christians, and in mediaeval times European leaders would do pogroms (of Jews), burning of Catholics etc. Then 20th century examples like segregation, Nazism and fascists like Oswald Mosely.

Nowadays we have the modern versions in MAGA and Reform and "stop the boats" and whatever this Swiss movement calls itself.

Always condeming "the other" and making sure only to pick on those who can't stand up or really speak for themselves, because that persecution is cheaper and easier than acually solving problems.

Especially if those problems could be solved by worker reforms and progressive tax systems.

[–] BananaIsABerry@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

We had a foreign exchange student from Switzerland living with us recently, and I can confirm that the German side of Switzerland thinks the French side as lesser.

[–] jaxxed@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I doubt it was an honest goal. It was most likely a post-truth political device for aligbment.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] vrek@programming.dev 33 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I know this isn't how it would work but im just picturing some one woman giving birth, the doctor hands her the newborn and she holds it for the first time... Some man walks in wearing a black suit and pulls out a gun. He shoots the baby through the head. "sorry that was the 10 million and 1 Swiss child, we have a limit!"

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Clearly it would be more humane to take out the oldest Swiss person instead of the youngest

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Much better idea: kill the richest person and distribute their wealth evenly amongst the rest of the population, public infrastructure, and social programs

Repeat until there's no billionaires, no poverty, and nobody has to go without anything essential for living in a modern society.

[–] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

this is switzerland, silly. they're more likely to kill the poorest first.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vrek@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That could be worse...watching tv on the couch with your spouse, you both laugh at the joke suddenly the door opens and your partners head splatters everywhere. The man in a black suit says "sorry, the tompsons just had a baby"...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (6 children)

This initiative was a conservative movement.

It would have been used as a cudgel to oppress immigrants or to target the out group.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

And when they run out of immigrants: Rules is rules

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Canadian_anarchist@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You might find Kurt Vonnegut Jr.'s story "2BR02B" ("to be or not to be") an interesting read. It's not exactly like your theory, but it's not too far off.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What does the article mean when it says switzerland is "all but surrounded by four of them"?

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It means Switzerland is all but surrounded by four EU member states. Germany, Italy, France, and Austria.

The point being every country around them is in the EU and Switzerland is a notable enclave when you look at a map.

[–] gnufuu@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Liechtenstein: "Am I a joke to you?"

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you've been to Lichtenstein, you know the answer is yes. We have villages that are bigger. And the architecture there is eclectic.

[–] remon@ani.social 9 points 1 month ago

I mean ... yes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anothermember@feddit.uk 10 points 1 month ago (5 children)

"All but" has always confused me as a phrase even as a native English speaker. You would think it means it isn't surrounded at all, i.e. "all but:" = "the last thing it would be is:", but apparently not.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Hmm, yet another right wing politician, peddling policy that would weaken the European Union.

Holly gosh, I wonder where he gets his ideas and/or funding from?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago

A lack of repercussions

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Luisp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

How do you cap population? Abortion is mandatory now!

[–] jestho@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

1940s Europe: 👀

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Killing babies in the name of satan AND removing womens' bodily autonomy in one action, call that far-centrism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 9 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Just what the hell kind of law is that?

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

A fascist law.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] calamitycastle@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have no particular skin in this game, but reading the article:

  1. Results are still pending
  2. Turnout of 59% > 55% of 59% is actually 32%

Come on folks 👀

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Depends entirely on how the voting results are coming in. It's entirely reasonable to call a result if the sample of votes counted already is a representative sample of the whole.

A counter example would be the recent elections in California. The early results came in from rural red areas for the governors race. So the early results were heavily weighed to the voting trends of those counties rather than the much different high density urban counties.

Also. Article mentions 55% of voters. It never said 55% of the total population. It just also stated independently a 59% total turnout. They wrote it perfectly fine.

Actual results map for anyone interested.

https://abstimmungen.admin.ch/en/details?proposalId=6860

[–] exu@feditown.com 4 points 1 month ago

That's a moderately high participation rate for Switzerland.

See this list of past votes.

https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home/statistics/politics/popular-votes.html

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm please to hear of the results. I didn't think the "No" side would have won by more points because the pre-referendum polls showed neck and neck.

Anyway, it's a silly initiative to begin with. I was thinking even if the "Yes" side won, in my mind I'm thinking "let the leopards eat their faces". Never mind the arguments on culture and so on, the economic damage to capping the population is insurmountable because it means fewer workers to migrate. And also, how is capping 10 million even logistically possible? Are they going to deport people? Who decides who to deport if a person is either long term resident or born and raised there? Are they going to do sterilisation if by some miracle there is a baby boom (which by the way, Switzerland like the rest of the world right now is having fewer fertility rate) and the population is reaching 10 million? Far right policies are moronic because they are purely based on emotions. Leopards eventually do eat their faces.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 4 points 1 month ago

It's exactly the same in the UK. The whole Brexit thing has been the unmitigated disaster that it was predicted that it was always going to be. It turns out that if you don't let immigrants come into your country they can't pick your crops for you they can't drive your trucks and they can't work in the hospitals (amazing who would have known).

It's almost as if immigration is useful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

The SVP sold it as anti-foreigner thing but it was really about forcing Switzerland out of the Single Market, a Swiss eqivalent for Brexit. Again. The SVP doesn't take no for an answer.

[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

55%... wow... what a landslide... /slowclap

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

The most mundane way to have sex to break federal law.

load more comments
view more: next ›