this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
23 points (100.0% liked)

Doctor Who Social Club

416 readers
18 users here now

A community for discussing all things Doctor Who.

Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.

2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to longtime fans feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.

3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.

4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.

5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. Spoiler protection will not be granted to information that is out in the mainstream media.

6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the DW franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.

7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.

Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
12-07 TWB 1x01 "Homo Aqua"
12-07 TWB 1x02 "Plastic Apocalypse"
12-14 TWB 1x03 "The Deep"
12-14 TWB 1x04 "The Witch of the Waterfall"
12-21 TWB 1x05 "The End of the War"

Doctor Who Wiki

---___

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ValueSubtracted@startrek.website
23
Russell T Davies says Doctor Who has not been cancelled – and tender process will secure show's future for "many years" (www.radiotimes.com)
submitted 2 days ago by ValueSubtracted@startrek.website to c/doctorwho@startrek.website
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SiliconAvatar@startrek.website 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah, the thing to watch now is the BBC opportunities page where their public tenders are announced. Until production of future Doctor Who seasons show up there, interested parties can't even pitch or submit a preliminary budget. And only then do we have a ballpark idea of the timeframe — assuming it goes like a recent tender for the hospital drama Casualty.

I believe it's a projection from the latter that has given the guesstimate that Who could be back on screen in 2028 at the earliest? I'm not sure that production will be quite as fast considering the amount of visual effects required for Doctor Who, but I'm optimistic 🙂

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Watch Netflix pick it up. I can’t understand how Dr Who isn’t profitable (enough) for the BBC to pump out yearly series. The TARDIS used to print money when Eccleston, Tennant, and Smith flew the blue box. It’s been pretty bad since.

If it were up to me, I’d give the role to norespawns. British guy. YouTuber, mainly does Fallout videos. Very distinct look. But I’d probably run it into the ground. I’d get the guy who does Black Mirror to write the episodes. Maybe bring Jordan Peele in. American, I think, but I like his style.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Charlie Brooker was asked at some point and couldn't do it, but he seems somewhat open to the idea:

" I was sort of asked about Doctor Who once. I wasn’t asked to run it, I was asked to write for it, and it felt a bit like the Home Office asking you to do something – like it was my national duty.."

"But I just didn’t have time because I was busy."

"So, if a big behemoth like Star Trek asked me to write for them, you’d at least take that call, wouldn’t you? You’d consider it. But with doing Black Mirror, you’ve got control; and when you wander into somebody else’s show, you’re trying to please them."

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago

Quentin Tarantino had/has a Star Trek script. Anything's possible.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago

Quentin Tarantino had/has a Star Trek script. Anything's possible.

[–] SiliconAvatar@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The way Netflix cancels shows at the tip of a hat, their involvement would be anything but "ensuring audiences will enjoy the show for years to come"... Netflix has a big reach, that's for sure. I just doubt their commitment beyond the next fiscal quarter report.

As for people involved,

  • Random youtuber with no TV drama experience — that'll be a no from me. I know a handful of those have taken the step to directing movies in the past years, but there's a long stretch from Fallout commentary to taking the reins of a (faltering) classic science fiction show.
  • Charlie Brooker ("the guy who does Black Mirror") — not very likely, he has his own, fairly weighty show to maintain.
  • Jordan Peele — this is a man doing multimillion dollar Hollywood movies. I highly doubt he would be a realistic candidate, but if he did join as showrunner or producer, against all odds? I bet some external investor purse strings would loosen right there. Then again, counterpoint: he has worked almost exclusively in the horror genre for the past decade.
[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I was kinda taking the piss with those names and references.

Netflix does cancel series a lot, but not the super profitable ones.

[–] SiliconAvatar@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry, humour doesn't always translate in text only 🙂

I don't think a licensed show like Doctor Who would count as super profitable compared to IP like Stranger things that they own wholly? They're pretty secretive about the factors behind their programming choices, so I dunno.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago

I think they really decide based on churn. What brings viewers in. So the question is, would Dr Who bring new subscribers into Netflix, or is that audience already there? If they're already there, that means they wouldn't get enough new subscribers. The thing is, people generally don't leave Netflix. I haven't willingly watched Netflix in a few years, but we still have it because my wife uses it. She watches a lot of true crime/documentaries. So, they are getting our money, but if it were up to me, I wouldn't pay them a dime.

If we weren't subscribers, I'm honestly not sure if Dr Who would bring us in. It would have to be really good. It captured our imaginations in the Nine, Ten, and Eleven years, but while Twelve and Thirteen were well acted, the story seemed to fall flat and it just wasn't interesting anymore. We like what they did — older Doctor, woman Doctor, Doctor of colour, LGBTQ+ Dcotor, all those things are well and good, but the stories just weren't engaging like they were before. We stuck with it because we love the brand and we loved what it was, but it was too little too seldomly, like a few episodes every couple years or more. Eventually we were just like "oh Dr Who's back, you in? Nah? Yeah me either, let's watch whatever else instead." So it would have to really do something special to bring us back, maybe others as well, I dunno.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

americans would ruin doctor who like they ruin everything else