this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2026
352 points (98.1% liked)

me_irl

7891 readers
2474 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nycvin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Eats shoots and leaves

[–] DrSoap@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is very relatable to me. I put on a lot of weight since the pandemic and its been so fun to flirt left and right and not be taken seriously, but every once in a while, someone likes big girls and bites. Panic.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] DrSoap@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

'Tis the only reasonable response

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I ‘flirt’ because dudes assume thats what I'm doing when I'm just having a conversation, and panic when they treat it like flirting. Because it isn't, ever, I’m ace/aro, keep your dick in your pants; I just like human connection.

But I’m also a chick magnet and I can’t explain that away with basic human decency..? I guess I give off vibes? I mean ladies are 1,000,000 more appealing than men, but I still don't want to sex them (tried both, meh)

[–] DoomProphet@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Have you tried not being attractive? /s

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

I’m open to advice, but yes, I make no effort to be attractive. I’m clearly not a great judge, but I wouldn't fuck me ;)

[–] velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago

Haha it’s probably because you like human connection first over sex. That’s why you’re a chick magnet.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Ace" is the same as asexual?

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yea, sorry, ace/asexual and aro/aromantic or not into relationships that aren't platonic :)

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Gross.

I’m not.

Horniness sounds like a massive burden, and romantic relationships are just friendships with touchy-feely stuff and lots of baggage I’m not into.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Its both a burden and exhilerating.

In one way its like nagging hunger you have to feed, or don't feed and are bothered by the hunger. But its also feels amazing like being hyper alert and biochemicals flowing, and if you eat its like a super tasty meal you can still savor later.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I will elaborate on my position: horniness and romantics are options to enjoy life.
And when someone is deprived of some of the options life gives, it is sad for me.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This person is not deprived of romantic relationships; they're there if they chose to pursue them. They choose not to as they do not derive enjoyment from them. Do not feel sad, be happy they know themselves better than most.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They choose not to

What I've derived from their answer is that they are incapable of sexual or romantic feelings. Hence they call themselves aromantic / asexual.

But if they're capable and it's their conscious decision to be aro / asex - then it's another story.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I mean, if you want to get into it sure. But at the end of the day, different people like different things and we all live different lives. It's not a reason to feel sad for someone. It's not like they resent their lack of sexual or romantic feelings, that's just how they are.

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thats not better.

Just because I'm not into what you are into doesn't mean my life is lacking. You like chocolate, I don’t like sweets much at all but if I have to choose a flavor, I like the taste of un-flavored foods as much as I like a strong curry.

Same thing. You see my life as lacking because of what you think I should like based on what you like, but it’s plenty rich in ways that actually speak to what I like.

[–] maxmalrichtig@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You see my life as lacking [...] based on what you like

I think that is exactly the case here. People just can't comprehend how a life other than their own would look like.

I guess that also falls under the Dunning Kruger Effect?

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I think that is exactly the case here. People just can't comprehend how a life other than their own would look like.

Oh, I can.
For years I had severe clinical depression and it rendered me incapable of feeling almost anything towards my SO, friends and relatives.
It was... I wouldn't wish that upon anyone.

Now medication at last is working and it's like chalk and cheese.

[–] LwL@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's... not the same as being aro at all. It doesn't mean you feel nothing towards anyone. Just that you're not interested in romantic relationships at all.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

What is left, when you subtract sexual and romantic aspects?

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

what you think I should

Not should. Could be able to.

[–] Sustolic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well to be honest I believe if I was given the option to not be weighed down by such feelings then I would take it.

Really would make it easier to make genuine connections with people without my subconscious doing some funky shit.

Now I could be wrong and I am assuming of course but I feel like a lot of those (not all) who are free from such urges prefer it that way and even if given the option to feel those things they wouldn’t take it.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

I would like an option to switch horniness on and off - that would be the best!

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you bother blind people about how they could experience the world if they were sighted, too?

Like its a moot point, idk what you hope to gain here other than being a dick about how your way is better when I have no way to ever know, and you can never see my point of view either.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Bother? If we would have a discussion with a blind person I would say, that I'm sorry too.

You probably have thought it's condescending, but I've meant it as compassion.
And now you're attacking me.

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The one time it worked I panicked so hard I'm now married. No flirting for me anymore… (it's probably better that way)

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can still flirt with your wife, you should go do it right now.

[–] zloubida@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I do! Not right now, but I do. And still panic when ti works…

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Echinoderm@aussie.zone 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

!shirtsthatgohard@lemmy.world is the better option to link on lemmy, as it will keep people in their home instance.

[–] banause@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago

Plus there is a dedicated "cross post" feature on Lemmy.

[–] YoSoySnekBoi@kbin.earth 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Funnily, both links look/act identical to me and keep me in my home instance. Must be an mbin thing?

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you use a mobile client thats probably the cause. On voyager they look the same to me as well.

The apps have been heavily developed to fix the instance interoperability quirks, but a lot of users are on web where the ! link works better.

If you are already on web version then idk. My info might be outdated.

[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

A web client is still a client that can do custom logic for clicking links or rewrite them when processing markdown. I don't know if popular web clients for either Lemmy or kbin do that, but they sure could!

[–] ButteryMonkey@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago

Thats true, and all this stuff might just be outdated info :) its entirely possible the web clients have been adapted, and we just aren't aware of it because.. who knows everything?

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Flirt? So like talk for hours about Warhammer 40k, Star Trek, Battletech and historical Naval battles?

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Battletech?

Which Clan would be best at doing sex? I think Goliath Scorpion would be tough to beat.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Well it sure as hell ain't the Ice Hellions.

[–] tja@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago

Good thing I don't know how to flirt. So there is no reason to panic