this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
65 points (95.8% liked)

Privacy

49245 readers
499 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)
[–] mcforest@feddit.org 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Makes it a $70 mod

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ferric_carcinization@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I get address not found.

Edit: I can access the site through Tor. Yay for censorship circumvention!

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A .60 cent mod (tape) will do the same thing.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

No it won't. There's a sensor that detects covering the LED.

This is the 3rd or 4th comment about this (across the Threadiverse) - why don't people ask why this costs $60 - and then go and find out? It's right fucking there in the article (before the paywall, even).

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm going to be honest, I don't really give a shit about meta or their shitty glasses so I never bothered to look into it and I'm still not going to bother now either.

That being said I still appreciate the correction.

[–] sk8boy204@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

This is why I enjoy Lemmy; homie sticks to their point but thanks stranger for the correction. Respectful, I appreciate that.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is a ~~Wendy's~~ ~~Reddit~~ Lemmy, Sir. We do not read articles past the headline.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

[sad voice] I knooowww

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Just cover it with tape

[–] voxel@feddit.uk 2 points 1 week ago
[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So prying off the protective glass, drilling out the LED, and filling the void with resin, like this creep demonstrates. With electrical tape covering the LED, it seems creeps are required to block the camera sensor, for roughly one second after initiating video recording: as the photodiode value next to the LED is compared to brightness of the camera sensor; so by temporarily matching the two, Meta's plausible deniability mechanism can be bypassed.

[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd say the creep is the person who designed these in the first place

[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

In particular, yes. But people seeking to secretly record others are also creeps in my book.