this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
147 points (97.4% liked)

World News

56655 readers
3951 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Football governing body Fifa has removed Somali referee Omar Abdulkadir Artan from the 2026 World Cup officiating roster after American authorities denied him entry into the country, ending what would have been the first World Cup finals appearance by a Somali match official.

Artan, the Confederation of African Football's men's referee of the year in 2025, was barred from entering the US at Miami International Airport and is currently in Turkey.

US immigration authorities have not publicly provided a reason for the decision.

In a statement, Fifa said Artan would be unable to participate in the tournament after discussions with US authorities.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 81 points 1 week ago (2 children)

US immigration authorities have not publicly provided a reason for the decision.

We all know the reason. Racism.

[–] 1984@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's not jump to conclusions. It might very well be xenophobia.

[–] RustySharp@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Poor que no los dos? ¯\⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[–] Mantzy81@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

"None of them foreign words, we speak english here, just like Jesus"

/s (obviously)

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

They'll eventually have to provide an explanation, and we'll discover that it's actually NOT due to racism, it's due to OBFUSCATED racism!

[–] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

FIFA bends the knee to Trump.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's unsurprising that FIFA is supporting American fascism, but seems like they could just send this guy to some Mexican games and try to get one of the Mexico-scheduled refs into the US.

[–] stylusmobilus@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

I was on the understanding that was offered.

[–] Aequitas@feddit.org 27 points 1 week ago

Fuck the USA

[–] slothrop@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago

Boycotting the circus is the only way.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

He could have been given a match on in one of the other hosts.

Cowards.

[–] pasdechance@jlai.lu 9 points 1 week ago

Bootlicking toadies

[–] vrek@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I mean this is horrible treatment of him and obvious racism but I don't think we can fault fifa for removing him for this. Like let's say you are an expert in brain surgery and there is a conference on brain surgery in France. You plan to go and give a talk. You get to the airport and for any reason you are told you are not allowed to enter France. Your employer is notified. What should they do? Obvious answer to me try to ask nicely to please let you into France, if still denied assign a Co worker of you to give the talk in your place.

What else could fifa do? "well this guy isn't able to referee so guess lets cancel the world cup" or maybe "technically he's not allowed in the country but let's sneak him in by putting him in a suit case and walking very confidently. Then we'll put him on international TV showing him in the country" or "let's hire a private militia and try to force the government to accept him".

Obviously he should be allowed to referee and yes it obvious racism by the government(if there was a real reason they would of said that) and fifa is a corrupt evil company but... Isn't this the only logical choice for fifa??

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Fifa can easily demand the host country to fullfill their obligations, and if not they could let him referree World Cup matches in Mexico and Canada.

[–] vrek@programming.dev -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True about Mexico and Canada but a demand means nothing without a backing. Your boss can demand or you will be fired. A pilot can demand or you're kicked off flight. An Uber driver can demand or you will be left behind. Fifa can demand and if denied(sounds like what happened), then what? Yeah it's a fucked up situation and he should be allowed in to referee but I fifa has no authority to demand he's allowed entry.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean FIFA kinda hosts the whole thing, they have significant power. But they gave Trump a FIFA peace prize and won't ban Israel despite banning Russia.

The real reason FIFA won't put in any efort is pretty obvious. It's a sportswashing tool completely owned by the West.

[–] vrek@programming.dev -4 points 1 week ago

They have power because they bring tourism to the cities, except they are not selling seats, hotel room or plane tickets as expected by investors according to articles I saw so what power do they have?

[–] lando55@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This could have been a huge PR win for FIFA, especially given their current reputation. Without digging too much into the logistics:

  1. Issue a positive statement supporting the referee in appeal or at the very least in spirit
  2. Allow him to operate in matches played outside of the USA
  3. Pay him what he would have earned regardless, offer other opportunities or a confirmed spot for the next event

I don't know if any of these has been done, but seeing as how FIFA leadership has capitulated to the whims of our asshole-in-chief in the past, it's tough to believe they would have acted like decent people.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

Ok, yeah I will agree with this. Pay him, allow him to operate outside of USA if possible and issue a statement of support. Basically no cost to fifa and good pr. Good choice.

[–] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think if FIFA was going to think logically, they wouldn't be a corrupt, evil company.

[–] vrek@programming.dev -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok, so you are now in charge of fifa. How do you handle this situation?

[–] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Immediately dissolve FIFA, and turn myself in to the proper authorities, and still probably face basically no consequences.

[–] vrek@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would you? Like really? That may be a good thought but you work your entire life to gain this career, you build a family on these resources, you build a life on soccer... A guy is not allowed into the US, fuck it let's abandon everything and decide to live in a jail. Still guy is not allowed in to the US, games still go on but I must easy toast everyday for the rest of my life... Would you do that?

[–] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I can only say yes so many times, and also point out again that it would probably include like, a couple weeks or months of jail time, and then I'd be free to go do as much evil shit as I wanted.

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

FIFA is about money, first and foremost. Kicking balls around and fairness are really much further down the list. Bowing down to Trump is what is happening here, no 2 ways about it.

[–] vrek@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago

Not denying that, but what should they do?

[–] belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Keep him on, but invite another referee to fill his place.

[–] vrek@programming.dev -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How? Like he physically can't to the game...

[–] belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Keep him on the list. Even if he can't be there, it's still a sign that you don't take the decision lying down. Of course, Infantino would not do that because he does not give a single shit about any of this, but you could save face.

[–] vrek@programming.dev -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And the point being? For example if an actor or actress has their name in the credits at the end of a movie I believe that's good for their career but would this have any effect?

I mean imagine interviewing this guy "fun fact: I referred the world cup. Ok.. I didn't actually referee the world cup but my name was on a list". He may be the best carpenter ever but I don't see the difference in being on the list or not.

Hell, without any searching on a website... Name a single other referee. They do hard work, as do shelf stockers and construction workers, I'm not discounting that. Honestly all this controversy may actually help him. It shows the us as being assholes but... If you ran a local soccer tournament and were looking for a referee, would you DARE turn him down and face the wrath of the internet?

[–] belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you don't get the point of showing the least bit of backbone, I can't help you.

[–] vrek@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They should show backbone, the other commentor saying to pay him and try to give him opportunity in Canada or Mexico I agree with. My point is there is no really good solution for them. What backbone do you want them to show on this? What should they do?

[–] belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago

You just described a perfectly good solution.