537
submitted 1 year ago by igalmarino@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 129 points 1 year ago

Twitter CEO Linda Yaccarino has not tweeted publicly about the delay.

But Musk has. It’s clear who is running things.

[-] pizza-bagel@kbin.social 84 points 1 year ago

I wish I could get paid as much as a CEO to do nothing

[-] shinjiikarus@mylem.eu 18 points 1 year ago

She is giving Tom Wambsgans with Lukas Matsson, human punching bag vibes.

[-] KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

She’s like twitters version of Ellen Pao.

[-] Chunk@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

She probably does a lot and then musk inserts himself into random situations and fucks it up. She says "okay eng team build Foo" and then next week Elon goes on a rant and cancels Foo without consulting her.

[-] taylus@lemmy.ml 125 points 1 year ago

the dead bird looks like sonic the hedgehog

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hyggyldy@sffa.community 8 points 1 year ago

Gotta die fast!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IHeartBadCode@kbin.social 86 points 1 year ago

In July, Musk tweeted about Twitter / X’s financial situation, saying, “We’re still negative cash flow, due to ~50% drop in advertising revenue plus heavy debt load.”

Advertising could be up two fold for all it matters. You sack a company that last turned an annual profit in 2019 with $44B in debt, it won't matter if Musk is shitting gold bricks. You can't pay that size of debt off fast enough. To just get started on that debt Musk would need to make Twitter twenty times more profitable than their 2019 profit. And even then that debt is going to be a monkey on his back for forty years in ideal conditions.

That $44B isn't chump change for Twitter, like maybe if Tencent took a sudden $44B debt they'd make good on it, but they're wildly profitable. Twitter barely gets by and has only gone on this long because of the Tech Bro funding that all but dried up when the interest rates were going up.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I can't wait to see how his offer to pay people's legal bills who get in trouble at work for saying problematic shit on his platform works out

[-] Lonnie123@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Alot like Trumps promise to do the same thing would be my guess

The last thing Twitter needs right now is to find more clever and creative ways to spend money, especially on other peoples legal problems

[-] Lonnie123@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Twitter wasnt saddled with 44B in debt, That was the purchase price, which included $13B in debt

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] fubo@lemmy.world 76 points 1 year ago

Why don't Elon and Donald pay their bills?

[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 91 points 1 year ago

Because "you don't get rich by paying your bills" according to them.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 68 points 1 year ago

They were both born wealthy so it would be pretty stupid to listen to them explaining how to get rich, unless you were also born wealthy.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

All you have to do is make coffee at home, don't eat avocado toast and work 25 hours a day. That way you can become a billionaire too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] shinjiikarus@mylem.eu 7 points 1 year ago

If you’d be born wealthy, it would be pretty stupid to listen to them explaining how to get rich, unless you want to piss away your and your daddy‘s money. Elon hasn’t made it quite the way (but he is getting there), but Trump Sr. must be very disappointed.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

From what I've read, trump's dad was every bit the sociopathic, evil, criminal, that trump is, he just wasn't a doofus like trump. So he probably pretty proud, except for the doofus, low-class part.

[-] shinjiikarus@mylem.eu 7 points 1 year ago

Oh, I didn’t mean „morally disappointed“, but disappointed in his inability to brutally grow the business instead of wasting his time with petty crimes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago

Because they're scum.

[-] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago

Grifters gonna grift

[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Because nobody makes them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] housepanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com 61 points 1 year ago

He cannot even manage to pay the rent due on the office space. Hardly a shocker that he's having trouble paying the revenue-sharing bills as well.

[-] APassenger@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

He can pay. He chooses not to, then acts like staying in SF is a grand show of loyalty (no one else will rent to him, he's a deadbeat).

He's pure gift who has managed to have companies that work despite him. He's the Zaphod Beeblebrox of business. But both heads are empty.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] sculd@beehaw.org 49 points 1 year ago

The blue bird being killed by the X is such a fitting graphic.

[-] EnderWi99in@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

What's funnier is it was already dying. It hasn't made any actual positive revenue since 2019 and then Musk dumped another $44B in debt on top of it. It really never had a chance and I think his original bid was either a troll he never intended to follow through with, or he was banking on leveraging all the blockchain and NFT stuff that recently also shit the bed. Either way, he's fucked himself out of at least a small chunk of his fortune. Well, at least until the rest of the market catches Tesla and their hyper inflated market cap finally also goes sideways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] deft@ttrpg.network 9 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 year ago

Elon can't deliver on a promise. I'm shocked.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 year ago
[-] fiat_lux@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago

Can't or won't? It's won't. Elon could pump a couple of million in to supplement shortfalls within a day maximum, if he wanted to.

[-] Fisk400@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

He doesn't want to and it would be really bad for him to involve his personal wealth in the company. They need to be separate when twitter goes bankrupt. It is also very unclear what his actual wealth is.

[-] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago

I have immense difficulty feeling sorry for any of the members of Elon's Rent-a-Fascist program. He's a huckster, everyone knows he's a huckster, and the people who don't or refuse to believe it will have to learn that lesson the hard way.

[-] teft@startrek.website 25 points 1 year ago

Weird. He was so good at paying his rent and other bills. /S

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 20 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In news that isn’t very surprising given the recent history of Twitter, which Elon Musk is currently rebranding to X, the company won’t be able to make some promised payments on time.

That’s not exactly what you’d want to hear from a program touting itself as “part of our effort to help people earn a living directly on X,” and the key to Elon Musk’s X dream for an app that handles banking, stock trading, and other vital financial features.

Musk announced the revenue-sharing plan in February, and the company sent out the first round of payments for eligible accounts (with paid verification via Twitter Blue or Verified organizations, 15 million “organic” impressions in the last three months, and at least 500 followers) a couple of weeks ago before opening up registration to more people.

However, hearing that payments aren’t arriving is familiar news to a number of people and organizations involved with X / Twitter since Musk’s takeover.

A Wall Street Journal article in February counted nine lawsuits covering $14 million in unpaid bills at the time.

In July, Musk tweeted about Twitter / X’s financial situation, saying, “We’re still negative cash flow, due to ~50% drop in advertising revenue plus heavy debt load.”


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Elon is directly and personally responsible for both the acquisition of massive and unsustainable debt and for the cratering of cash flow through loss of advertisers.

[-] SomeGuyNamedPaul@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

50% revenue drop is a good start, if you ask me.

[-] bloopernova@programming.dev 17 points 1 year ago

But definitely trust them with your money! They're gonna be a bank!

[-] d4rknusw1ld@artemis.camp 11 points 1 year ago

lol Elon sucks.

[-] Shikadi@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago
[-] MaxVerstappen@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Yes, please keep all the Elon shit nearly packed into one sub that I can block.

[-] 7101334@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This looks like Sonic the Hedgehog

That's my offering

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
537 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

34781 readers
222 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS