this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2026
615 points (97.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

11596 readers
2260 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

And now you can pay $60 to get less of their features!

[–] Ethanol@pawb.social 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's good that OG directly linked to the toot but I always hate when dates are cutoff. This toot is from 2024 when Google started introducing manifest v3 which prevented ublock origin from working, hence many people were looking for alternative browsers and Brave was one of the more popular ones. While I would not recommend Brave, I've heard the crypto rewarding program is opt-in and the affiliate link injection was removed soon after getting backlash.

Brendan Eich is still an ass though, and Brave has very bad business practices. Only recently Brave announced a 60$ (free on Linux though) minimalist variant that removes unwanted features like the crypto rewarding program, Brave VPN and AI chatbot which are built-in for the default browser variant.

[–] solxix@pawb.social 7 points 7 hours ago

The fact that they did it in the past is proof that they'll pull shit like that again.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I'm a big fan of the duckduckgo browser. Love me the burn-all-the-cookies-and-history bonfire button that make it great as a default browser and I click random links more confidently now that it's my go-to.

[–] 4shtonButcher@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Team Librewolf reporting in.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 6 points 10 hours ago

IronFox for Android standing by

[–] razen@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Librewolf logouts from all websites and also dark mode settings is reverted once i quit the program and re run. Is it how it is supposed to be?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 hours ago

Sounds like a "delete all cookies and session data after closing the program" type of setting.
Maybe try to look at your settings :)

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago

Brave has ran a bunch of youtube ads. Like raid shadow legends style. That's how I know it's a shit browser

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 40 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

Why would I use something other than firefox?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

because Mozilla insists on sucking major ass? idk

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well, I would recommend waterfox over firefox because waterfox has just straight up removed any AI stuff rather than giving you the option to opt out of it.

[–] hoch@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Sounds like a lot more work than just opting out

[–] HellieSkellie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 12 hours ago

~ish, waterfox is reconfigured firefox. They have a single button sync on first launch to clone your firefox data over, it took me like 60 seconds to swap everything over. And you get a lot more than just removing AI from firefox, it's essentially a preconfigured firefox. Removes a lot of telemetry and analytic stuff, strict-enforces better security protocols, prettier layout and stuff.

It doesn't really buy you any new functionality, but it's way quicker to just use waterfox than it is to spend hours configuring the weird shit like private DNS in firefox.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] olenkoVD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 19 hours ago

Also, it's still Chromium, meaning it can be affected by Google's decisions.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 79 points 20 hours ago (10 children)
[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 34 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
[–] InfiniteStruggle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

Nothing much, what's up with you?

[–] superpill@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Shocking number of people under-informed about browsers here.

Brave just released a $60 paid (except on Linux Desktop) version without bloat. It worked barely OK in the first place, but didn't obfuscate all of your browser fingerprint. It spoofed fonts, that was its major innovation.

Only Tor truly anonymizes web traffic. This is not opinion, this is fact.

LibreWolf, Mullvad, and hardened FF help, but they all give their own fingerprints. As does Vivaldi and Floorp.

Personally, I cycle through all 7 of these. Only things tied to my name on stock FF. Everything else gets its own different browser private mode and VPN location.

Use whatever you want, but understand that unless you're on Tor or spreading your risk across multiple tools, it's trivial for Google to triangulate you across the web.

[–] anzo@programming.dev 4 points 9 hours ago

Thanks. Very good comment, I agree.. And yet...

Ironically, not being on what most people are using (stock Chrome without extensions) is already a fingerprint. And tor browser, even if it is providing anonymity, is also a huge fingerprint on itself, by blocking all the fingerprinting stuff...

The irony is lost the moment you come up with a proper threat model upon which you base the decisions of what security and privacy measures are going to be taken for a given online activity.

I really liked (and used it for quite a while) that extension, Ad Nauseam, that would actually follow behind scenes all ads and shit...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›