this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
88 points (92.3% liked)

memes

21999 readers
2939 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Being is a state, Nothing is a state.

Being (something) and (being) Nothing are opposites.

Yet Becoming requires you to go from Nothing to something, or stop Being something to introduce enough Nothing to become something new.

Long time since I read Hegel though, might be hogwash.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yet Becoming requires you to go from Nothing to something, or stop Being something to introduce enough Nothing to become something new.

Why not just becoming something from a state of something else...nothing is not really required for this transition.

[–] toofpic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's probably said from the point, that something that was, becomes less that. So, more nothing, in a way.
But really, I love philosophyzing, but I'm not calling it a job. It's like a monk is just sitting there chilling, but if you confront him about not working, he will answer: "bitch, it took me years to learn chilling that hard!"

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't short change yourself, with enough time, effort and application you could still get a degree in the humanities, that's basically what they do :p

For real, philosophy was mostly around before we figured out empiricism and scientific methods. People had to think quite a lot to come up with models that made internal and validated sense even without evidence. And we still have a lot of stuff we can't test, but that we wonder about (theology, paranormal stuff, hard solipsism, "before" Big Bang, etc), we just have stricter requirements and more developed methods that we call differently.

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

am 46. wishing i had a degree in philosophy, just because i love it. started a commonplace book. reading Baudrillard currently. Enjoying it!

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exciting stuff! Hope you share some of your insights as you go, philosophy is much underrated!

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is could both be an excellent question or a less interesting one :p

The less interesting one is answered that by Being you are, and thus cannot become. (Just as u/toofpic describes)

The excellent question is why we can't Become when already Being, or why we can't unBecome from Nothing. For that we'd have to read more Hegel to understand the context.

Why is it that when you take away from Nothing, nothing happens? It makes intuitive sense, but why must it be so? What would happen if it weren't so?

Hegel suggests that the qualities of purest Being and purest Nothing are the same, and that's why the Becoming takes them into eachother.

I don't know that that's useful though, someone else care to explain?

[–] davetortoise@reddthat.com 0 points 1 month ago
[–] RollingZeppelin@piefed.ca 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How do you take away from nothing? What are you taking?

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The concept of Nothingness?

Or closer to Hegel: Nothing is the lack of all differentiation and content, and thus absolutely undifferentiated.

Pure Being is without further differentiation, it has no diversity within itself, and is thus also absolutely undifferentiated.

Nothing is pure Being (and with some other arguments the reverse is also true), they are inseparable and unseparated, yet distinct. And Hegel argues that the Becoming is the movement of one into the other, distinguishing them for a moment only to be resolved again.

You can read it yourself in Hegel's Science of Logic

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Bro tried dabs for the first time

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

That guy looks like he would make a good capacitor.

Hegelian Dielectric

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

This is what happens when you express metaphysical binary relations without including units

[–] Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago

You need to read it in the original Klingon.

[–] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Niels Bohr: "sigh..." (unzips)

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

You can become anything you want, with continual action towards the goal.

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah? Well emptiness is loneliness, and loneliness is cleanliness and cleanliness is godliness, and God is empty just like me you dumb idiot

[–] tobebannedbygaymods@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

hegel is extremally overrated