-22
submitted 10 months ago by spaceghoti@lemmy.one to c/politics@lemmy.world

By now, it’s hard to deny that Trump has a narrow but plausible path to authoritarian rule in the United States. Polls show he could well win next year’s election. Trump allies are openly developing an elaborate blueprint to transform a second term into full-blown autocracy. Prominent columnists have demonstrated in great detail how it might succeed.

But certain versions of this argument have grown seriously problematic. It’s sometimes said that our institutions and civic culture have withered so much that resistance to Trumpian tyranny would be incapacitated, rendering its onset all but inevitable.

Such a reading of the moment risks leading us astray.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

If it was just Trump we had to worry about, I'd say that there was little reason to worry. After all, Trump's so incompetent that he'd try to become a dictator, get distracted by some petty grudge, trip over his own feet, and leave office without having destroyed democracy. (Though he'd definitely still wound it.)

The bigger problems are the people Trump would appoint into positions of power. While Trump distracted us with social media feuds, these people would be filling the government with loyalists and forcing out anyone who valued the rule of law over the rule of Trump. Then, when they did horrible things, they would have no pushback and they'd be able to have courts rule that it was perfectly legal for them to break our democracy. These people are the bigger threat.

Maybe our fears are overblown and we'd emerge fine, but it's not something I'd bet on. If I were told to run through a deadly gauntlet with machine guns, poison darts, buzzsaws and the like, I'd refuse. Only if my refusal was denied would I hope that I emerged unscathed. And if I did so, then it wouldn't mean that there was no danger there - just that I was extremely lucky. If Trump and company regain power and we don't lose our democracy, it will mainly be due to extreme luck - not because there was no danger from Trump and company.

[-] spaceghoti@lemmy.one 6 points 10 months ago

Non-paywalled archive link: https://archive.ph/Zw2JO

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


He and his allies are vowing to stock the government with loyalists who would trample legal constraints, arrest political opponents without cause and persecute the “vermin” voters who resist him.

A year later, historians Lara Putnam and Theda Skocpol documented an unexpected groundswell of painstaking political organizing among formerly apathetic middle-aged women to defend democracy, fueling Democrats’ 2018 midterm blowout.

During the 2020 election season, despite outbreaks of street violence, most voters saw protests against police brutality as peaceful, legitimate political activity, rejecting Trump’s effort to smear them in threatening terms.

Trump’s incitement of a violent coup attempt inspired the Democrat-led hearings investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack, the most riveting public case mounted by a governing body in at least a generation.

Yes, Trump can win, but polls likely reflect voter disengagement long before Election Day, and alarmist obsessing over them risks distracting us from a deeper cause of our crisis.

But it’s also possible to take this too far, and here it’s worth registering an irony: Ruth Ben-Ghiat, a scholar of strongman rule, has noted that a time-tested tactic of authoritarian leaders is to disarm the electorate by suggesting their glorious triumph is inevitable.


The original article contains 1,072 words, the summary contains 196 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

If Democrats just think happy thoughts, they won't need to vary their messaging or change their behavior to try to win votes!

[-] Obstagoon@lemmy.world -5 points 10 months ago
this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
-22 points (22.5% liked)

politics

19082 readers
3499 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS