this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
122 points (98.4% liked)

World News

56382 readers
2208 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.nz/post/38159652

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

So, plenty good to skip MS/Goog, but why what seems like reinventing a lot of work when there are things like LibreOffice/OnlyOffice already out there? Didn't see anything in the article which makes it seem like just a branding effort.

[–] D1re_W0lf@piefed.social 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s indeed an OnlyOffice fork. I guess they want to play safe, considering that OO is Russian based.

[–] FarraigePlaisteach@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I didn’t realise OnlyOffice was open source. Any guesses why they forked that instead of LO?

[–] sandwichsaregood@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

OO is significantly closer to MS office UI wise. As to why they forked it, OO was basically only open source on paper and didn't really accept external contributions. They tried to shut down this fork with some dubious legal claims that are blatantly in conflict with at least the spirit of the open source license as icing on the cake.

[–] flyos@jlai.lu 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's not just UI wise.

They explain it on their website : their internal logic for a document is based on OOXML logic, while LO is rather based on a ODT-based logic. So compatibility with Office is more straightforward in OO (though we know Microsoft is not quite exactly following the OOXML norm, so still not perfect...)

Is one project clearly more important than the other these days? Given the gargantuan effort that goes into these suites I’m surprised we can talk about two of them credibly and in the context of open source.

[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

It also supports epub files, unlike libreoffice

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The intent is to replace MS Office in government use, so it's necessary for the EU to maintain its own codebase. The whole point is reducing government dependence on foreign-controlled software. The only way to accomplish that is to create your own self-controlled fork.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Especially considering the rather... drastic measures they original owners took. Starting a lawsuit when someone tries to fork your open source software is an excellent sign that someone badly needs to create a fork of your "open source" software

[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Lawsuits are always interesting to verify that Libre licenses can actually preserve software freedom.

The case isn't as crystal clear, as you'd expect, in my opinion. Although I see ONLY OFFICE acting against the spirit of the license.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't know much about the legal aspects, but the fact that someone running an open software project will even consider a lawsuit about forking it shows that they're a terrible keeper for an open software project.

[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 2 points 4 days ago

There are some cases, were it could be justified. But if you're just trying to be a PITA: Get forked!

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Kinda dumb why can't they just improve existing ones like libreoffice for example.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz -3 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The program itself is a web‑based, open‑source editor for documents, spreadsheets,

They want me to use a government controlled web based office suite?

They'll have to pry my LibreOffice from my cold dead hands!

[–] SpongyAneurysm@feddit.org 8 points 6 days ago

They want me to use a government controlled web based office suite?

It's even a fork of ONLYOFFICE, a Russian developped office suite, might be relevant info for you, if you want baseless paranoia.

It's an open-source codebase, licensed under AGPLv3. That's pretty neat, if you ask me. And being web-based it fills a bit of a different niche, than Libre Office (and I bet it will be pretty compatible). Nobody's gonna stop you from using that, except the same people who would've formerly chained you to MS Office.

[–] Vittelius@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago

Where do you get the government controlled from? It's developed by European companies, not governments and you can selfhost.

[–] KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org 2 points 6 days ago

You really should read the article before posting comments.