this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
52 points (94.8% liked)

Climate

8747 readers
373 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
52
Scientists have scrapped the worst-case climate scenario – because action is making a difference (theconversation.com)
submitted 3 weeks ago by solo@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

the seven new scenarios

a high-emissions scenario – known as RCP8.5 and its successor SSP5-8.5 – had been removed. Under these worst-case scenarios, nations would make no effort to cut emissions and expand fossil fuel use.

Taking RCP8.5 off the table is a sign of progress – we’ve avoided the worst-case scenario. But we have also missed the best case future.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] errer@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Do these models explicitly include the datacenter boom which seems to be on track to be more than household usage? Cause if not I think removing the worst model seems premature…

[–] onainigo@tardigram.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

https://tardigram.com/m/MedioAmbiente/t/27285/La-cadena-alimentaria-del-Artico-se-ve-afectada-al-superarse

https://tardigram.com/m/MedioAmbiente/t/27288/Un-nuevo-informe-OMM-y-Met-Office-sugiere-que-se