And you don't think this is at least some of those CEOs' point?? Now they can rehire people for even less than they paid them before
Programmer Humor
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
Wait until they learn how much it costs to fix the mistakes made by Artificial Idiocy.
The AI craze among the Epstein class has revealed some indisputable facts in a way more obvious than ever before:
- The rich hate the poor and hold a genuine, malicious and sadistic desire to see them suffer and die. Its not just a consequence of their pursuit of money, it's an outright explicit goal
- The ruling class is abhorrently incompetent, increadibly lazy, and inconceivably stupid. There is no group of people less qualified to lead the world than the class of people who currently lead the world.
- There is no "things will change before they become irreversible". The ONLY answer is to eliminate the Epstein class. They will lead the world to Armageddon with a smile on their dead faces.
- Technology under capitalism doesn't become mainstream when it has sufficiently satisfied the problems it promises to solve. It becomes mainstream FAR before it is ready because the Epstein class thinks its magic.
Of course. If they had a grain of empathy they wouldn't be rich, to begin with.
AI CEOs might end up doing better, you know?
Probably not, AI CEOs will be trained on data from how real CEOs work .. so AI CEOs will make all the same problems, with all the same gas lighting that they are doing a great job. Also the AI CEOs will be provided by megacorp models so you just know they will be biased to benefit the owner mega corp over all else.
this is the part that really baffles me, though I guess I can't expect much from the class that seems to be literally incapable of foresight.
Like say AI actually does get there. Some company is able to crack human consciousness and we get truly intelligent AI, good enough to replace your workforce with... that AI isn't going to be free. It's going to be a monthly fee for your business. and then when you're fully reliant on AI, when skilled labor is simply too difficult to cultivate any further, it's going to inevitably enshittify. These corpos will end up slaves to the AI company.
It's like they fundamentally cannot see that they are giving up control. They're so fucking stupid.
Eh. It's par for the course. 20 years ago, at the height of the frenzy of outsourcing things to China, I remember saying that this will just result in US companies creating their own competition. Anyone with a brain could see that Chinese companies weren't going to be willing to serve as second-fiddle to their US masters. The idea that you could keep design and management, while sending production overseas, and that you can keep that arrangement stable long-term? Pure fantasy. Of course a country isn't going to be content just doing the grunt work. They want the highly paying design and management jobs, not just the menial labor ones.
Well, it's a good thing China doesn't make cheap LLMs that you can run on local hardware...
A lot of AI contracts and services were priced assuming literally everyone was going to adopt it so the MLMs all tried to undercut each other to get market share.
Turns out, not everyone wants it and they undercharged significantly so the snake oil salesmen are jacking up their prices to try and stay viable. Leaving a companies that early shrunk their workforce holding the bag paying more in expenses and lower productivity because they bought in to the bubble without even checking how factual claims were.
This is what happens when mfkers don't read any Marx.
American capitalism would be doing way better at profit maximizing if people in positions of power across the private sector had studied Marxian economics. Giving away your means of production as a software business would be an obvious no-no.
This is the shit that always blows my mind, to be honest.
You want to maximize profits? Train your workers, put them through school, invest in your workforce.
All the companies that just hire bodies and forget the most important part that sets a human apart from the rest of the animal kingdom astonish me. You get more value per person if you work towards increasing each person’s value instead of increasing the value of persons.
The whole AI scam has always been the techbro CEOs snatching the money from the non-techbro CEOs. Me or you as a private person was never the direct aim. . . . General artificial intelligence will not come. We don't even have artificial intelligence yet. The terms artificial and intelligence contradict themselves. It's an oxymoron. It's still just machines that learn shit without body and soul...
IDK. I get really uneasy about claims that a computer or AI can never be intelligent or self-aware. Sure, it's "just" circuits, but your brain is "just" cells passing information between each other. An individual cell is no more intelligent or self-aware than an individual transistor is. It's deeply unscientific to believe there is some magic voodoo involved in biology that can't be reproduced in a machine.
I have never argued that it is never possible, just like time travel or teleportation is technically possible given a radical breakthrough in our understanding of how the universe works. But as of right now, AGI/true intelligence/etc. is still purely science fiction and LLMs are not even remotely close (and are a complete deadend towards that goal).
At least with human labour companies have control. They withhold raises and bat down wages and the people tend to have to take it.
With AI you get suckered in and all of a sudden have a subscription or something similar. Then next year the costs go up. You've already tailored your workflow to use AI, you can't just not pay the higher bill. Next year, costs go up again. What are you going to do? Not pay your bill and lose your entire workforce all at once? Now the company is being held hostage by the AI companies.
For anyone who has worked for a large company that was around for the IBM mainframe days, it's hilarious watching them try to remove the mainframe from their tech stack, while simultaneously becoming dependent on AI.
Of course they are too dumb to expect this outcome, but it's so fucking obvious this would happen. OpenAI is still burning billions each years, just wait and see how much it will cost when they need to make a profit. (They have already cut down on the free version)
I mean, it's the same freaking market strategy that's been used for over a decade in tech and nobody seems to realize they're inside a slowly boiling water..
Workers can and should do this too.
Union strong, babbyyy
Any service you depend on in the modern world, you need to be asking yourself 'what will I do when this enshitifies itself'. And it is a when.
Short termism on all sides is destroying our society.
Tbh, this is just SaaS in general
My boss is getting annoying with this shit.
I'm stuck on x issue
Have you tried putting x into ai?
Yes I've been doing that for two days.
Really? Huh. It should work.
K well no it doesn't.
Just copy the error and put it into Claude
Yeah...I've been...doing that.
It should just give you the solution


Meta was spending ~300 MILLION dollars per MONTH on tokens around a month ago.
I knkw they are using Claude, so the price estomation of 5$ per 1M tokens is kind of true, more or less.
Tell me how is this sustainable in the long term?
In a 30-day period, total employee usage on the dashboard exceeded 60 trillion tokens, and the highest-ranked individual user averaged 281 billion tokens. Using the least expensive version of Claude Opus 4.6, which costs $5 for every million tokens, that one user alone could have cost Meta more than $1.4 million.
https://fortune.com/2026/04/09/meta-killed-employee-ai-token-dashboard/%E2%81%A9
Using the least expensive model of Claude
Meta makes LLMs. They’ve made multiple, some of them are even tailored for coding.
Why are they using Anthropic’s AI instead of their own?
I can only imagine there’s some sort of ouroboros slop machine money laundering cycle going on or something
Because their LLMs suck, and they still want their devs to be productive, while watching their usage to train the internal models.
They give you a choice, and no one is using the internal models.
~300 MILLION dollars per MONTH Tell me how is this sustainable in the long term?
Every single rich SOB on earth is pooling their hedged bets together. Since 2022 Meta has been issuing bonds directly to investors. They announced another 30 Billion in bonds at the end of 2025.
People need to realize that the AI bubble will not pop by accident. It will pop as a direct result of the Epstien-Shareholder class cashing out and leaving retail investors hodling the bag.
Did they seriously not see it coming? Lol.
Most management types can't see beyond their next bonus.
That goes double for any publicly traded company.
I spent an hour today on a webinar about how to optimize token usage with more than 500 other participants from the company I work for. Because billing is about to have its come-to-Jesus moment.
Phase one: Fuck around 🤡
Phase two: Profit! 🤑
Phase three: Find out. 😱
And get it blatantly wrong.. not that a human wont also, but just like the computer, humans can be conditioned to defend the exploitative conditions of their own existence.
Utterly delicious.
I think some CEOs are probably okay with it costing more - that's less benefits to pay out, less PTO/sick days to deal with, and less labor concerns when you run your AI slop machine 24/7 instead of those pesky 40 hour work weeks.
AI will have to cost a lot more, or hurt the bottom line other ways (people stop buying your AI shit).
AI is already hurting their bottom line, but they keep fantasizing about the future gains, that actually will not arrive. Ever.
They are being sold on the hype that AGI is possible and that eventually the costs won't matter because somehow the AI brains will scale production massively and allow the already obscenely wealthy privatize the gains of humanity while letting millions of us die as their solution to the climate change caused by AGI. Essentially they have no issues poisoning us and wasting money now as long as they get their supreme digital slaves in place and never need human labor again. Deeply unlikely but nobody said these folks are smart.
Yea, and less control over your spending. The AI provider has the business by the balls and can change prices any time. And they will, by a lot, as soon as they secure enough market share.
LMFAO
I expect exactly this level of competence from Uber.
It's management who fucked up, but let's blame it on software because what we really care about is hating the software.
https://mstdn.social/@hkrn/116589985138352696
A decent article about enterprise depending on AI subscriptions and a discussion on hackernews.
Anyone else hate the structure and style of Axios reporting? Those bullet points like structure?