this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
123 points (99.2% liked)

Not The Onion

21547 readers
1349 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] binux@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago
[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 6 days ago

its like HBO MAX, is not HBO, or HBO PLUS.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Now we need a backronym for it.

Perhaps "eXtremely Bulky Overpriced Xbox".

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Wait, do people still buy the xBox?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Darthcapi@lemmy.ml 65 points 1 week ago (3 children)

They paid a consultant firm to come up with that rebranding strategy

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago

It's worse:

Asha Sharma, Xbox CEO, ran a poll on X earlier this week, asking fans whether Microsoft should use Xbox or XBOX. The results were in favor of XBOX, and the company has now renamed its X account.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (6 children)

They hired the best brand strategy team from McKinsey

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

Clearly, the audience relishes the nostalgic flavor of HOME BOX OFFICE, and so HBO Max should be rebranded to just .. HBO.

That'll be $20mm please.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

With Paramount and HBO now consolidating they're gonna need another name. ParaHBWBDISC++ perhaps?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago

Discover!: Paramax HimBO Mounts the Warner Brothers

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Max+ Go Away (with your inevitable price gouging)

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Christ I hate these people. I work with a guy who constantly says “You gonna tell me marketing and branding doesn’t matter? Apple is the most valuable company in the world!”

Like that makes ANY sense…

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

I'm sorry, is your coworker Jerry from Rick and Morty?

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, it is important, but not as much as these people think it is

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It exists. I’m unconvinced that it’s “important.”

Internet advertising has taught us a lot. Every single part of it is trackable so you can see what value you’re getting from it. And that value is tiny. This is why internet ads are a mess. It’s a fuck shit stack of deceptive trash because that’s the only thing that can actually bring home a fraction of a penny. Display ads are like chemical suits: they do nothing!

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's not necessarily how ads work though. Who clicks on an ad anyway? But a few months after seeing it, you're looking into buying something and you remember the brand or website from the ad you saw. Or heard on the radio.

Incidentally, I know someone who quintupled a company's sales in a foreign country subsidiary in a few months by increasing ad spend. The upper leadership in the home country was against it since "we have a strategy and it works" but since he took control of the subsidiary, he could take the risk and disobey orders. Back home it's a known brand already, but nobody knew it in that particular target market.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I don’t doubt that in some situations, when everything else is primed - the product is good, the market is there, and awareness is the only thing lacking - advertising can make a difference.

For every anecdote like your friend’s, though, I can produce a hundred where millions just went into a hole for absolutely nothing.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I can't really give much detail on that particular instance without doxxing myself or the person, but the product was something where, for the most part, it doesn't matter who you buy from, the quality is (supposed to be) the same. There's always a market for it, too, even if demand isn't always high.

Google ad spend is what made the difference. When you've got several companies offering more or less the same product or service and the user just types in "where to buy x", you want to be among the first. They were in that market for YEARS and nobody had heard of them.

But that's just direct advertising mostly to people who are already searching for that product. Indirect marketing works too, even if it's more subtle and harder to measure short term. Several times have I gone to a store when thirsty and craving sugar and grabbed a Coca-Cola or even Pepsi, but I think the last time I got RC Cola was 20 years ago. It's those fucking Christmas ads, you see them every year growing up and then as an adult you no longer watch TV, have adblock on everything, and you STILL instinctively grab one.

Then there's the branding itself as part of marketing. There's a reason energy drinks are shit like red bull, monster, rockstar... They know who they're marketing to.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Sure, transactional SEM either works or it doesn’t and you know if it does. Brand marketing and advertising is a completely different ballgame. Being at the top of the searches when people are buying your product type is one thing. Buying a Super Bowl ad is another.

[–] Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

then there's Huy Fung foods.. they didn't advertise for shit, made sriracha sauce and sold like crazy because his product wasn't a pile of hot garbage.. he didn't needs to rely on lies (marketing) and advertising (more lies). make something good, and consistent and people will buy it

also don't treat your farmer like an idiot if you wanna stay in business but ya know.. another story

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The thing about marketing, and branding is, it's less about selling the product immediately, and more about keeping the brand identity in peoples minds.

There used to be a time in the 1960s when Howard Johnson was one of the most dominant brands of hotels in America. They existed at the height of family road trips. The boomers were anywhere between 5 years old and 20 years old. So mostly at an age when they're kids/teens. So they became the brand of ice cream at the hotels for the kids, good nights rest for the parents. But they never evolved as the boomers grew up, and the family road trip died off. Today, the brand is totally dead. It's the Ask Jeeves of hotel brands.

But now look at Coke. Their ads don't ever entice you to drink coke. They don't really advertise the product. They advertise the brand. You see polar bears telling a short story, in 15 seconds. Followed by the coke logo. You don't get "HEY EVERYBODY!!! DRINK COKE!!! IT'S DELICIOUS!!!"

They don't do that. They don't advertise a product, they advertise firmiliarity with a brand so when you're in a store, and see soft drinks, you recognize the coke logo. Eventually you start seeking it out. And now those ads are no longer about advertising. They're about conditioning. And it works. When's the last time you had Jerrys old time cola? Or RC Cola? Maybe pepsi. But there's a reason "Is Pepsi ok?" Is the meme, and the answer is no.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

'so why aren't you the CEO of the world's most profitable company? you know so much!'

'well uhh you see uhhhhhh'

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ah, McKinsey. The Henry Kissinger of consulting firms.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well of course the war is in Vietnam and not Laos.

/s

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I think you missed a few iterations of HBO there, there was the HBO Go and HBO Now, two separate services depending on if you had their box-top service or not.

[–] Darthcapi@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is the best thing I’ve seen todat

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That’ll be 50k, sir

[–] GMac@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

Or someone couldn't figure out how to turn off capslock.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They should have gone with Copilot X

[–] chefdano3@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] PixeIOrange@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

For those who don't know (like me) it's explained here: https://www.demilked.com/logo-design-fails/

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

I'm interested...

[–] CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Microsoft appears to be actually rebranding Xbox to XBOX. Asha Sharma, Xbox CEO, ran a poll on X...

Savage

[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 1 points 5 days ago

Microslop stays on brand across every vertical.

[–] slacktoid@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 week ago

They should rebrand to a company that makes game consoles

[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Yeah, the og Xbox sitting in my TV stand definitely says "XBOX" in the center of the unit...

[–] nyahlathotep@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

That'll save the brand

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Someone give this guy a raise!

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

That is truly funny.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

the company has favored using similar capped versions

fr fr all cap

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

Savagely capsmogged by this rebrand

[–] jankforlife@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 week ago

lol lmao even