this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
36 points (97.4% liked)

UK Politics

5491 readers
160 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigTwerp@feddit.uk 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

What short memories people have. The incoming Labour government proposed the most radical wealth redistribution measures this century to address poverty and the whole country had a shit fit.

Meanwhile they were also discovering that the Tory governments had lied about borrowing and spending.

...so most of their first year in government was taken up with trying to work out where the Tories had actually been spending our money and re-writing their plans on how to actually improve things.

Since then they have done a lot of things that in theory should alleviate poverty (free school meals, raised taxes on higher earners, increased NHS pay, raised minimum wage, massive infrastructure investment, new investment and laws to make adoption of renewable energy easier, renters reform, removal of inheritance tax breaks for wealthy landowners, that's just off the top of my head) but will take time to actually show a change. Statistics are released yearly about 6 months in arrears so we won't know whether this worked until late 2027.

Then we have been cut-off from one of our major energy supplies by an out of control superpower, not something you can really blame our government for but when people see prices going up they want someone to blame.

Edit to add that clamping down on parasitic organisations like Uber, Amazon, Starbucks needs to be a priority and is an easy and obvious win and it is annoying they haven't.

[–] elgordino@fedia.io 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Getting rid of FPTP would be a help. Governments are getting elected on ever smaller shares of the actual vote. Labour only got 34% of the vote at the election. Governing was always going to be hard, and the huge gap between the parliamentary majority and the reality of the public is not helping.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

They got 34% of a 60% turnout, or about 20% of the possible vote.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Labour only got 34% of the vote at the election

Labour only got 420+ seats in parliment, leading to a surplus from majority required of 80+.

Due to the elections timing law, they had five fucking years with this majority to unfuck the country, two of which are fucking gone.

You'd think they'd be making progress by now.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

I don't see how? Labour got 34% of the vote, but has a massive parliamentary majority due to FPTP. That majority should translate into being able to do whatever the fuck they want for 5 years.

In all likelihood, a switch to a more proportional system, though very positive in the long run, would have a serious teething problem in a country like the UK where we're not used to it: political parties would actually have to work together to get anything done. If we still have a prime minister, they would need to retain the confidence not just of their party's MPs, but also of the other MPs in the (likely) coalition. In a country where politicians are used to just being able to have their way when in power, that seems likely to cause problems in the form of coalitions collapsing every five minutes.

This can be a problem in other countries with PR. It's not a necessary feature of PR by any means (and FPTP is so awful that it's also not a reasonable criticism of PR) but I think it's more likely to happen in a young PR system than an established one.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 13 points 1 day ago

Title feels like an onion headline

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Fixing literally anything could tbh.

But they're always breaking more than they're fixing.

[–] saykee@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Shocking that addressing the problems of the people might help a PM stay in power!

[–] Cherry@piefed.social -1 points 1 day ago

Problem is it’s too little too late.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Don't get crazy here, this itty bitty bit of instability could never justify taking rich people's hard earned money! ^/s^

[–] BucketBong@p.hobo.social 3 points 1 day ago

Hmm while saving the poor is a great idea, I'm not so fond on saving the jobs of politicians.

[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doing what their votes want instead of what reform voters want is the only thing they need to do.

If I could upvote this twice, I would

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How exactly is someone meant to solve poverty in 20 months?

There is no silver bullet, and redistribution of wealth takes a long time, even if you go full armed revolution.

Progress is being made, albeit slowly, wages are growing faster than inflation, school kids are getting free meals, 3rd+ kids aren't being punished for simply existing.

There is a lot more to do, but suggesting nothing has been done is pure fiction.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

The problem is those are minor steps of appeasement and they are reactionary to unease.

It should not have gotten that far. And unfortunately voting and democracy has been hijacked by the rich who have no intent of playing fair.

The politicians did not care on the way down and can’t be trusted. We voted and played fair. The average man contributed, worked hard and went along with the rules and still get taken advantage of.

It’s been shown political parties cannot act In the interests of the commons. They can be bought and manipulated.

They had the chance to not have poors. They abused it. Short term we can keep cycling through parties with further appeasement but the system is broke. We all know. And we all know they won’t give it up and redo the system until they fear the mass

There are more of us. They can hide behind tech and policy but there are more of us and we are not powerless.

  • Use your voice to organise in your communities.

Use your wallet to punish those who continually take and disrespect from you.

Use your force to demand fair treatment
.

Remember you dont need to use violence…however the message that anti-violence is not working can be powerful tool.