this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
591 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

84597 readers
4548 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magnolia_mayhem@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

And here Mozilla is, trying to send everyone they can away

[–] spaceracoon@lemmy.zip 72 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Man it's so funny how the only company that even thinks about allowing you to not have AI, gets so much shit from people.

OK you don't like AI, you can turn in off. They added an option for that. Meanwhile Chrome is automatically downloading 4gb worth of models without your consent. Same with basically each other browser.

Folks are free to use whichever distro they like, Librefox, Waterfox, but remember that without Mozilla foundation the very engine would stop working. Then these forks will not work anymore. Then where will you go? Chromium? Safari?

It's important to keep companies accountable, but nothing is ever black and white.

[–] czardestructo@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 15 hours ago

Yeah I get the feeling like 70+% of people here will never understand that.

[–] KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org 8 points 20 hours ago

Yeah - people love to shit on Mozilla while posting from fucking Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 23 points 1 day ago

People seem to care more about synthetic benchmarks than using a browser that gives them much less tracking and ads. Remember when chrome was popular because its so fast? I never noticed a difference between that and Firefox in ordinary web pages, except Googles, since they are intentionally making it slow for Firefox.

And with all that going on, people still picked chrome. :)

[–] imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OK you don’t like AI, you can turn in off. They added an option for that. Meanwhile Chrome is automatically downloading 4gb worth of models without your consent. Same with basically each other browser.

Because Chrome is used by normies who have no idea and wont care while Firefox is used by tech-literate users who care and like to tinker. The backlash was because FF implemented AI that you had to go to about:settings to disable. Result of backlash - a switch in settings to disable it.

It would be smart to implement AI and advertise people that they can switch it ON if they want to. Not the other way.

Folks are free to use whichever distro they like, Librefox, Waterfox, but remember that without Mozilla foundation the very engine would stop working. Then these forks will not work anymore

There is nothing to go to. But if we accept the outcome, we just submit to the system. Might as well switch to chrome at that point hoping that Servo gets developed fast enough. Firefox would lose their browser share at an instant once they are not different from chromium based browsers. Basically seppuku themselves.

Not understanding your user base is how you get a backlash.

[–] TotalCourage007@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Its okay we'll just cope with living in idiocracy. Some of this stuff is beyond basic. No wonder people find IT a thankless Job.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 1 points 20 hours ago

I've been looking in my laptop and PC (both running CachyOS) for that download Chrome is pushing, and haven't been able to find it in any of them. I'm not saying it's not happening, I'm saying that it seems like some Linux distros are immune to that crap.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

I like Vivaldi

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Now if only Apple will let Firefox run its own rendering engine instead of Safari’s.

Like, that’s the only thing I don’t get. Other apps which are not web browsers, fine. Use Safari. But an actual web browser? FFS, let them use their own engine.

[–] pwxd@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

You can! There's a browser called reynard and it's based off gecko web browser but you still need to sideload them, it isn't available in App Store :-(

The main goal for this browser is to make web browsing usable for older iOS, I find it pretty neat so I wanted to share this!

https://github.com/byeCl0ud/reynard-browser-compiled

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

its just that Apple forces Webkit to all Apps on the app store.

Orion has gotten around that, somehow. Not sure what kind of wizardry they’ve pulled, but they managed to get both Firefox and Chrome extensions working on iOS.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That's Apple's explanation why, but it has flimsy justification. There is no technical reason why Firefox mobile can't use the Gecko rendering engine on Apple iOS. So, unlike every other graphical OS I've ever heard of, you can't really pick your browser. You can only play dress-up with Safari and pick its outfit.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I'm no apple fan, but I will note that their Tight AF control over the apps nets them a very very small power draw and ram footprint. I don't think they're pushing safari because they don't want you to have a choice, I think it's control over their own perf that they're looking for in this case

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

That argument seems flimsy when I can still download Trash Match Casino Deluxe: Extra Ads Edition from the app store.

[–] ReptilianCleric@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

I doubt it. There's a lot of money in surveillance capitalism and I don't buy for a minute that Apple are too good to do that or any stupid excuses.

[–] Fuckswearwords@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Does anyone here know how to get the old menu UI back on mobile?

I can't get used to the new one. It's not ergonomic at all imo.

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

What do you dislike about the new one?

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Now if Mozilla would finally get a CEO who is not driven by stupid capitalistic bullshit, I would actually start using Firefox again.

Until then, I stick to WaterFox.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Does WaterFox allow using Mozilla accounts to sync bookmarks and tabs between devices or have some equivalent option?

[–] yessikg@fedia.io 1 points 16 hours ago

It does, it's only flaw is that is uses Brave's ad hijacking thing

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] skami@lemmy.ml 62 points 1 day ago (17 children)

Nice but it's kinda wierd how people decided to use these browsers after this new law was passed, I mean it's so easy to install apps on smartphones right now but people needed this choice screen to choose another browser of their liking? I would guess it's probably old people that switched that didn't know how to install browser without it, I googled but couldn't find any prove of this tho so it's just my guts

[–] morto@piefed.social 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We tend to overestimate people's skill in tech. The average user uses what came installed, doesn't like installing and experimenting apps, uses a browser while logged in to google, taps yes on everything, will install apps when sites ask for it, without even noticing, and will register in every site or app that asks for it, and even give their real email, name, etc

[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And there are probably many users that do all of this due to being afraid that things might just start breaking, or that more actions they don't understand will be required to keep the system rolling, if they stray from this path for even a little.

Yeah, there is a very large part of society that tends to default to “if I change anything, I’ll probably break it. It works now, so I won’t change anything.” It likely has a lot of overlap with the “you touched my computer eight months ago, and it stopped working yesterday. Whatever you changed must have broken it” population; anyone who has become the de facto family tech support will know exactly who I am talking about.

[–] axh@lemmy.world 103 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It's laziness. Most people just take the path of the least resistance.

Once you show them the screen, any choice is the same amount of work so they will select what they really want. But without the screen, 90% of people will be good enough with the default option. Or, they might even be mildly uncomfortable with that option, but not enough to do something about it.

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s laziness. Most people just take the path of the least resistance.

we all do in many parts of life

[–] axh@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I didn't say it's a bad thing. If someone tried to pay attention to every little choice they make, they would be exhausted before the morning coffee.

What kind of browser I use is important to me, since I am a geek. But I don't pay attention to many things that more socially adept people would consider important.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

it’s so easy to install apps on smartphones right now

Providing choice as a default is precisely about people who are influenced by defaults. It's NOT about how feasible something technically is.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›