this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
592 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

84643 readers
3841 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Now if Mozilla would finally get a CEO who is not driven by stupid capitalistic bullshit, I would actually start using Firefox again.

Until then, I stick to WaterFox.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does WaterFox allow using Mozilla accounts to sync bookmarks and tabs between devices or have some equivalent option?

[–] yessikg@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago

It does, it's only flaw is that is uses Brave's ad hijacking thing

[–] foxfell@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

For the same reason I don’t like Chromium or Alpine Linux. Minimalism can be nice, however in most cases too many features were stripped away to be useful tools. At least for me, so no offense to people who love the minimalistic approach :)

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Too locked down for the average user.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It genuinely hurts my soul that this is a complete argument.

The idea that users could or should have preferences - to be responsible to opt (in or out) in any capacity is an unreachable goal.

It's frustrating that a lazy or evil developer can so easily convinve the masses to give up privacy simply by dangling a shiny just outside the default security safeguards.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It is? I didn't notice anything. I suppose by virtue of having even heard of it I'm not the average user.

[–] graynk@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

With default settings it will wipe your history and cookies on exit

(Which I happen to forget about every single time I install it on a new machine, I hate this default with a passion)

Then there's disabled WebGL, which you also have to reenable on a bunch of sites. Not too hard, but probably annoying for some

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I forgot about that too. Thanks.

[–] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Some websites don't work correctly, due to the strict settings.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I guess I don't view those types of sites on my Pc (probably on my phone).

[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Its a really really simple change to make them work again and iirc you can set a profile but it is mildly technical which means wayyy too difficult for average people

[–] kepix@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

most people are too dumb to find the options menu

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Isn't waterdox owned by a weird company?

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not anymore. It’s owned by the creator again.

[–] UltraBlack@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I like because it’s essentially a stripped down version of FireFox that runs faster and does without any Google or AI being defaulted to on or being in the browser at all (AI).