this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
150 points (99.3% liked)

politics

29742 readers
2211 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/60005391

Top Virginia Democrats have decided against exercising a controversial procedural end run around last week’s state Supreme Court ruling that struck down their redistricting, which wiped away a gain of four House seats, the Democratic leader of the state Senate told The New Republic.

The decision—which nixes a complicated idea, discussed over the weekend by Democrats, to replace the state Supreme Court and get the case reheard—is likely to anger rank-and-file Democrats who had hoped the party would respond aggressively to the ruling, which has made it more likely that Republicans hold the House this fall.

The decision also contrasts sharply with moves undertaken by many GOP state legislatures in the South, who are aggressively gerrymandering their states with wild abandon to erase decades-old majority-majority seats from existence, after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a key Voting Rights Act protection against racial gerrymanders.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KC_Royalz@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Seriously I'm so pissed off. When the fuck are democrats going to learn Republicans don't care about rules and they shouldn't either. Start fucking fighting. Don't lay down!!!

[–] 3abas@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

When will you learn that Democrats are not real opposition? They exist to give you the illusion that someone is fighting on your behalf, when they're in power they fund genocides and war crimes while gaslighting you and backing off on most of their top issues, when Republicans are in power suddenly they care about minorities and women and healthcare again. Rinse and repeat.

Run on single-payer healthcare; when in power, establish and defend a Republican healthcare plan. Run on protecting Roe; let it get shredded after decades of fundraising off the threat. Run on student debt relief; deliver a means-tested maze and call it historic. Run on climate action; approve drilling, pipelines, and record military budgets while telling you to recycle harder. Run on labor rights; break strikes when workers become inconvenient. Run on immigrant justice; expand deportation machinery, cages, surveillance, and border militarization, then act horrified when Republicans use the same tools more openly. Run on criminal justice reform; fund more cops. Run on democracy; crush third parties, sue to keep opponents off ballots, and tell you there is no alternative.

And every election, the pitch is the same: “This is the most important election of your life.” Not because they intend to transform anything, but because fear is the only thing they have left to sell. They point at Republicans and say, “Look how bad they are,” as if being slightly less openly cruel is a political vision.

The function of the Democratic Party is not to defeat the right. It is to absorb anger, neutralize movements, discipline the left, and protect the ruling class from any genuine alternative. They take the language of justice, diversity, feminism, labor, climate, and peace, strip it of any threat to capital or empire, and sell it back to you as branding.

They do not fail because they are weak. They fail because their donors, consultants, lobbyists, and institutions are getting exactly what they paid for: no universal healthcare, no end to empire, no serious redistribution, no confrontation with capital, no real democracy in the workplace, no liberation from police violence, no break with apartheid, no politics beyond managed decline.

Republicans tell you they are your enemy. Democrats tell you they are your friend while helping your enemy build the cage.

At some point, we have to stop mistaking betrayal for incompetence.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

They exist to give you the illusion that someone is fighting on your behalf

And they aren't even doing that anymore.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 97 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the question becomes "Why are Virginia Democrats defying the will of Virginia voters?", considering Virginian voters said they wanted this.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago

Scratch a liberal...

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 71 points 2 days ago

"Go nuclear"

It was voted on by VA voters. Unlike every Republican redistricting.

[–] KC_Royalz@lemmy.world 66 points 2 days ago (1 children)

and the Democratic party caves again. So over it

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Quick! Hide behind my scruples for protection!

[–] Steve@startrek.website 39 points 2 days ago

Democrats surrender without a fight

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Virginians, you officially have a cuck problem. Or a findom problem. Or both in your democratic representatives.

Don't get me wrong, we all do, the democratic party would rather suckle the teat of billionaires than EVER do anything to help the working class.

At the point that you ignore the will of the people through the most democratic method, their votes, what is holding up the government besides the good will of said people?

Fuck the parasites. Fuck the billionaires. They want to cry that "tax the rich" is akin to a racial slur. They're lucky that's what most people are saying, it's the moderate position. But making the rule of law worthless and leaving no methods to make change?

You're fast tracking revolution.

Let me know when we're ready.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Didn’t they already appeal to SCOTUS? I mean, technically, that’s more nuclear than the “nuclear option” in spirit.

Ffs. REPRESENT YOUR VOTERS. Not doing anything is exactly the GOP playbook. They want u to appear like you are breaking a rule, but they broke everything to put you in the position to act when what they did appears illegal.

Again, ffs.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They deserve all the ire. Stand for something you weak willed cowards.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they stand for nothing, what do they fall for?

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 3 points 2 days ago

They're willing to wait for it.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Non-voters did nothing in the face of fascism. Ill boo them too.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Most non voters realize you get the same results regardless of which shade of fascism gets elected, nothing changes.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yep. If the voters don't show up, it's not like the Democratic Party deserves all the blame.

I keep getting chastised about how politically incorrect it is to point the fingers at the voters, though. As if there is really any other option...

[–] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 1 points 2 days ago

Okay, hol' up. My head is spinning over this. We're talking about Democrats who WON, who ARE IN OFFICE, refusing to act on the will of the voters...

...and it's because they're throwing a tantrum about not getting ENOUGH votes? That's the only thing that I can parse out of blaming the non-voters here. Like, "Oh, we'd love to do something for you, but your fellow citizens were little shits who stayed home on election day. Sorry."

[–] wizblizz@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Is this not controlled opposition? It doesn't make any sense otherwise.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It makes sense if it's a party of rich, comfortable, conservative-leaning liberals who aren't really all that bothered by rich fascists running the country, and aren't at all keen to hand any power to poor lefties who hate them and might challenge their privilege.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 0 points 2 days ago

"Ohhh that must mean you're a bot! Or Russian! Or secretly a Trumper! Talking back means you're a fascist!"

-Your typical Blue No Matter Who voter

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

These are the very same people that are going to come begging for your votes in a few months, Telling you that you need to elect them to fight fascism and corruption.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And if you tell them you're voting third party instead, they think you're a Trumper. Yay.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Good thing I don't give a fuck what they think

[–] Switorik@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Both parties need to be replaced.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just one time I want them to go nuclear, sift through the remains, pick out the large pieces, grind them all up, and take that dust to create a new glowing glass and drink the finest whiskey from it.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

Make
Uranium
Glass
Great
Again

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago

seriously, when do they think they'll have another chance to?