this post was submitted on 10 May 2026
260 points (95.8% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

3060 readers
4 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

❻ Don't be a dick.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 days ago

Economics filled the void in society vacated by religion after the Enlightenment.

A mechanism of control, conjured by the ruling class, imposed indiscriminately upon the masses, protected from scrutiny, and justified by arbitrary, curated rules.

  • Economists are its priests.
  • Banks its churches.
  • Finance its mythology.
  • GDP its God.
[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

People just use religion to mean a popular idea now I guess. The invisible hand is an abstraction of general observed trends. It's a metaphor. Unlike gods, no one thinks it exists in a literal sense, and to say it doesn't exist figuratively would be absurd. Anyone can acknowledge a society's needs can sometimes be met by someone with a profit incentive. You don't have to think that's a good way to address them to admit that the selfish interest and the collective interest can align. I don't know how society could function at all if this wasn't the case.

And who ever said growth could be infinite? A basic idea of microeconomics is that marginal profit decreases with increased production until it inevitably becomes negative. Capitalism, like all economic models, is a proposed way of managing scarce resources efficiently.

People may be over-enthusiastic about these things I guess, but that doesn't make them religious any more than someone being keenly interested in model trains makes them some sort of zealot. These comparisons are really forced and relies on intentional mischaracterization which serves no one.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

After all, isn’t paying one’s debts what morality is supposed to be all about? Giving people what is due them. Accepting one’s responsibilities. Fulfilling one’s obligations to others, just as one would expect them to fulfill their obligations to you. What could be a more obvious example of shirking one’s responsibilities than reneging on a promise, or refusing to pay a debt? It was that very apparent self-evidence, I realized, that made the statement so insidious. This was the kind of line that could make terrible things appear utterly bland and unremarkable.

-Debt: The First 5000 Years, David Graeber

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I would say it is a scam, and they are well well aware of all these points. They just don't care, it's about having your time filling your pockets then run away before the consequences can catch you.

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

It’s easy. You just need to move on -- like a plague of locusts. Like a fucking plague. Failure is a core tenet of liberalism. When life closes a door, it opens a window. And if the fall is too steep, use the fire exit. Run to the roof -- you always have that airship on the dock. The most important thing is to keep moving. Keep dreaming. The auditors cannot get to you if you keep running -- very, very fast, from one fuck-up to the next.

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

So it's a Megachurch?

[–] claimsou@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Yes I think everyone is aware the pie is finite. They just want the bigger share of it before we run out of pie.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 8 points 5 days ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invisible_hand

And they also don't read their scripture.

More famously, it is also used once in his Wealth of Nations, when arguing that governments do not normally need to force international traders to invest in their own home country.

So according to Smith the hand would maintain employment of the population, not drive down prices.

In both cases, Adam Smith speaks of an invisible hand, never of the invisible hand.

[–] cyan_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 days ago

Where did this pic of Pynchon come from? I was only aware of the one from his time in the military.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I just tried gravityies rainbow a third time. Couldn't do it

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Careful, you dont want to anger the economy with such blasphemous thoughts...