this post was submitted on 07 May 2026
549 points (98.4% liked)

Open Source

46794 readers
490 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Its always good to try!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The idea that the Major Software Enshittificator which is Samsung would ever go along with this is incredibly naive.

Samsung was one of the first to fill their smartphones and tables with tons of useless "Samsung" software that can't be removed by normal means, and even people who had their older and less insanely stuffed with junk devices got them forcefully filled with that crap via updates (making their older devices unusable, "incentivizing" them to get new ones).

Samsung hasn't been consumer friendly for at least a decade.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 5 days ago

When smartphones became a thing, everyone had Samsungs. I played around on a classmate's Samsung Galaxy Whateverthefuck (might've been a Gio or a Y) and in addition to the hardware itself being shit because it was a low-end device in like 2010 or 2011, the software was HORRIBLE. So I vowed never to buy a Samsung and I still haven't. Maybe their software got good, maybe it didn't... But my first smartphone was an Xperia and the one after that was the second-gen Moto G. Quite stock-like Android and that's what I've preferred since (though I'm now on iOS, but that's a different story)

[–] parson0@startrek.website 31 points 6 days ago (2 children)

And I encourage everyone to write to banks and other service providers to provide apks directly or through F-Droid

[–] viov@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

For F-Droid and for Accrescent too. Both would be amazing love this!! Added that suggestion to my latest post post on europe@feddit.org about things people want

Here's the link to the post:

https://lemmy.world/post/46554959

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 days ago

We might be able to get them to provide APKs with some luck and finesse, but I unfortunately don't see them publishing to F-Droid. F-Droid actually builds your APK from source themselves.

Actually, as I'm thinking about it, that may be true for F-Droid's main repo, but I know other repos exist, so maybe they could host their own that you would just add to your F-Droid's repo list?

[–] furtiveParalysis@jlai.lu 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Fairphone and samsung are absolutely not the same kind. I want to point fairphone is officially distributing /e/OS which is a niche of 2-3 brands. This company that is nowhere in size close to samsung also engages hardcore in device repairability making its phones be a flagship. If anything just let them be successful and tempt others to follow their lead. I would love graphene os to be better supported but just don't put all the strain on the one doing good. (I type this from my FP6 /e/OS)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] razen@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (3 children)

How come Linux worked on desktop but on phones it is having such a hard time even tho Android has the linux kernel( i think).

Is PC hardware more open and known to everyone about everything while mobile dosent? And if that is the case then why arent phone opening itself for support?

[–] peskypry@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Because ARM is a fucking mess. Each device has it's own of booting. There's no standard like UEFI or BIOS.

Plus you need propreitary code for modem to support 2G, 3G, 4G....etc. which are complicated to implement.

[–] viov@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Would that be a good focus? To get a unified standard for ARM developed to get many devs together to make software/OS'es for it and adapt phones to use those OS'es

[–] megopie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago

so, Linux does work, a lot of stuff works. There is nothing fundamentally different about phones other than them basically all running on ARM instead of x86, which is more common for PCs. More development of stuff for X86 Linux than ARM Linux, although less of a difference than there use to be.

Really the issue is proprietary stuff built on top of android and IOS. Stuff that a lot of useful apps rely on for security and functionality. For instance banking apps are super locked down for obvious reasons, but the standards that have been adopted by the industry for mobile banking are all entangled with proprietary close source stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I have a newer Pixel phone and I'm comfortable installing and running custom ROMs from doing so regularly back in the day - for those who've daily driven both, what are the reasons I should NOT switch from the stock OS to GrapheneOS?

[–] dafta@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You can't use Google Wallet to pay with NFC, they don't have Miracast, and Chromecast can supposedly work butI haven't been able to get it to work. Those are the three major hurdles I've found, but getting away from Google was a priority so I'll live without them.

NFC can have other providers other than Google Wallet, but I haven't found any that I find trustworthy enough yet. Supposedly the EU is making an alternative.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I think this is about what I've heard to date on drawbacks, by as you mentioned, I think I'll take the chance for the privacy benefits.

[–] unique_hemp@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The EU already has alternatives, quite a few banks have their own NFC implementations.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

Not yet. They have QR, and are working on NFC.

[–] dafta@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 6 days ago

Fair. Unfortunately, mine don't.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mio@feddit.nu 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It would be nice to buy a phone that officially support GrapheneOS. I dont want to thinker with phones. I can image it is going to be the same experience as going from Windows to Linux. Things would actually work in a good way as a user wants to instead of locked down requirements.

[–] unbuckled_easily933@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

GrapheneOS has partnered with Motorola and were supposed to see phones that come with GOS sometime in 2027

[–] MoffKalast@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It's pretty funny that out of all the manufacturers Graphene doesn't find acceptable, they went with Motorola in the end lmao. Were Nokia and Ericsson not available?

[–] viov@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Who knows but GrapeheneOS success with Motorola can encourage other OEM's to want to work with them.

As for why not maybe Nokia/ Ericsson people aren't aware of it somehow or not focused on how good it is as an alternative

Definitely would love to see what Nokia does with GrapheneOS. Also, never heard of Ericsson till now what do they specialize in/what do people like about them?

Please and thanks

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I wonder if that's influenced by inventory control industry. Motorola/Zebra has been in that industry in a way that Samsung/apple/LG hasn't been

[–] cdzero@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Fairphone do work with Ubuntu Touch.

[–] viov@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Wait really? Ooo I have to check that out. Thanks!

[–] peterhorvath@mastodon.de 1 points 3 days ago

@cdzero @viov Btw, Ubuntu mobile is long ceased to exist, what is this ubuntu touch thing now?

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 days ago

Samsung, no. Samsung can't be trusted with anything. That would be like using Tor on Android.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 6 days ago

Switching my fairphone to e/os today

load more comments
view more: next ›