this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
60 points (98.4% liked)

Pravda News!

343 readers
258 users here now

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

US Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins on Saturday openly celebrated millions of people losing their food assistance, which experts say is a direct result of the Republicans' 2025 budget law that slashed funding to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program by $186 billion over a decade.

In a social media post pointing to preliminary data from her department, Rollins boasted that there were now "4.3 million off SNAP and counting!"

"Under President Trump, Americans are getting back to work!" Rollins added. "Healthy employment numbers mean less reliance on government programs. Leaving benefits for those who truly need them. America is back in business!"

In reality, the unemployment rate is currently higher than when President Donald Trump took office in February 2025 and there has been almost no growth in net employment since the president announced his "Liberation Day" tariffs just over a year ago.

The Associated Press on Monday published a fact check of Rollins' claims about SNAP, finding that Republicans' cuts to the program were far more likely responsible for the historic drops in enrollment than any purported improvement in the economy.

Caitlin Caspi, an associate professor at the University of Connecticut who studies food insecurity, told the AP that current job creation numbers are nowhere near strong enough to explain the massive number of Americans losing access to SNAP.

"We’re not seeing a linear kind of drop-off,” Caspi said. “We are not seeing, if you look at the unemployment rates, things that might be an indicator that a strong economy was driving this change. We don't see, for example, a pattern of decline in unemployment that would match the pattern of decline in SNAP participation."

Caspi's analysis was echoed by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), which last week published an analysis finding that "economic conditions haven’t been improving as the number of people receiving SNAP has plummeted in recent months, representing the sharpest decline in decades."

Instead, CBPP pointed the finger squarely at the GOP's budget law as the biggest culprit behind the decline.

"The deep cuts to federal funding for SNAP are shifting significant new costs to states," wrote CBPP, noting that the GOP law "also dramatically expands SNAP’s already harsh and ineffective provision taking away people’s benefits for not meeting the work requirement."

Rollins' claims about SNAP enrollment were also criticized by Rep. Shontel Brown (D-Ohio), who expressed disgust that the administration is bragging about kicking people off food assistance during a time when the price of groceries has continued to rise thanks in part to Trump's own policies.

"Better economy where?" Brown wrote on social media in response to Rollins. "You mean the one where Americans paid $300 more on their groceries to compensate for Trump's tariffs? Kicking 4.3 million Americans off of SNAP is not a flex, it's a failure. That's why I've authored legislation to reverse the Trump SNAP cuts."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CatalpaRed@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I am still confused as to whether this money actually exists and that, by denying it to people, it’s going into some rich guy’s pockets, or if they’re just doing it to be cruel.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 2 points 5 hours ago

The money isn't in the government coffers, if that's what you mean. The cuts to SNAP are to compensate for the cuts in taxes that were included in the Big Beautiful Bill. So instead of taking the money out of a rich guy's pocket and distributing it to hungry kids, the rich guy gets to just keep it.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

When you're starving, don't forget who stole your money to kill little children.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 3 points 11 hours ago

Was it Mexicans and other foreigners? Fox and OAN and my favorite streamers told me it was them.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago

These fucking ghouls are spending a billion dollars a day in Iran right now.

[–] tacosanonymous@mander.xyz 7 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

Guillotines are too nice for some people. Perhaps we should bring back drawing and quartering.

[–] Krusty@quokk.au 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I hear crucifixion is nice this time of year.

If you're going to make him a martyr you might as well do it right.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Honestly I could use a little bit of that. Like 5%?

[–] Krusty@quokk.au 2 points 17 hours ago

You just need to claim that you're disabled. You don't need proof or be getting SSDI/disability. This also means no work requirements.

That's the only exemption left. Homeless? Veteran? Homeless veteran? You don't qualify....

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

These MAGAts are sickening.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago

They're not human and no one will convince me otherwise

[–] MantisToboggon@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Sinonatrix@hexbear.net 3 points 22 hours ago

Another proud victory for the Dog Chasing Car think tank