this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
50 points (96.3% liked)

World News

2093 readers
1196 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm with you, good sir.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Lemme guess: they're 2 weeks away from a nuclear bomb.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And once they've got the plutonium to trade, another four days away from getting ahold of Doc Brown's time machine.

[–] newton@feddit.online 4 points 1 week ago

Release the Epstein files ,

[–] lath@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe this time they're trying to live up to all the hype...

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There us still zero evidence that will build nukes

[–] lath@piefed.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wouldn't you, in their position?

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I would probably but I am not them. The religious decree prohibiting nukes was not removed . As theocracy they take their religious decree seriously

[–] newton@feddit.online 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Sure ,mossad told this to CBC news.

We've heard this shit before ,in the weeks before the invasion of Iraq , nothing was later found

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Sure ,mossad told this to CBC news.

  • It's syndicated from the Associated Press. CBC News did not write this. Right there in the byline.
  • It's based on an interview from the head of the IAEA, Rafael Grossi. First paragraph.
  • In a world where your fantasy version of events is what happened, why would CBC News be citing "UN nuclear agency" as their source in the headline?

Good job not reading the article literally at all, dipshit.

[–] newton@feddit.online 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We have all heard these Lies when America attacked Iraq, both during the first and second invasion and it turns out.... No weapons of mass destruction or nukes. Everyone now sees your lies.

I think it's a nice name dipshit. I will use it as a new profile. Thetechnician 27dipshit. Thanks maga

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I will use it as a new profile.

Mossad told you to do this, didn't they? Even the opposition is in their pocket.


Edit: All jokes aside, no attempt to justify or even acknowledge your bullshit claim about CBC News.

[–] newton@feddit.online 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, you got your orders from him. That makes sense; you're almost as stupid as he is, thus he outranks you.

[–] newton@feddit.online 1 points 1 week ago

Try to sleep or take a walk, find a woman or ..... man

[–] ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can we please refrain from using insults, please? You made your point. You didn't have to add "dipshit".

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

You didn't have to add "dipshit".

That's true, but since they decided to follow it up with homophobia, I've decided not to feel bad over it.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

They seem a good deal more responsible than certain other governments with nukes, so I can't really bring myself to care.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

By "highly enriched" they mean no where close to weapons grade should put that front and center as well as all evidence being Iran never has, by all evidence ever attempted to build a nuke.

I won't believe this news until they start randomly launching ballistic missiles into the ocean.

[–] misk@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

Is there an international treaty that Iran is a signatory to that would prohibit them from this? They're a sovereign nation that has right to manufacture nuclear arms, same as US, North Korea, Israel, Russia, China or France do.

[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The nuclear propoganda surrounding Iran is crazy. The world has seen the most recent example of North Korea. When was the last time you heard about them, they removed the missile defense system from SK. NK is basically a member of the international community now.

What do you get when you get rid of your nukes? You get Ukraine. What do you get when you enter into an agreement to not develop the ability to create fissile material for bombs? You get Iran.

The only way to be safe from the precision bombing powers is to have a nuclear weapon available. We are entering a new era of nuclear proliferation.

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Obama: I think, you will find this method of internationally vetted uranium enrichment will allow you to err... continue using nuclear power for civillian purpouses and keep the international community calm

Iranian leadership : agreeable

Trump : FUCK YOU

Iranian leadership : Nukes it is.

They are more reasonable than Israel, which has never allowed inspectors and still denies having bombs, and is on a genocidal rampage

[–] egerlach@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Would certainly be nice to have an agreement that allows for nuclear inspectors so this theory could be validated.