That is the end goal of this legislation, yes.
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Aye shame he supported the people enacting it. Could’ve seen that coming a mile off really.
Surely the leopards would never eat MY face.
Who did he support?
The CEO of Proton threw his weight behind Trump’s Fucking Clown Caucus about them being “better for small businesses”.
Bruh, I need a alternative to proton
Trump+Republicans
Proton CEO can suck my sweaty balls for all I care.
I stopped using Proton as soon as I saw his tweets praising Trump.
The privacy community will lose their shit if this is even hinted at. Fuck Proton forever
Actually the "privacy community" is already pretty on top of this, see:
https://lemmy.world/post/24301835
For me, whether it was officially retracted or not there are plenty of options that don't come with the potential fascist endorsement so I'll just go with one of them instead.
Already? This was years ago, wasn't it?
It was last year, and "already" was a response to the presumption that the privacy community didn't know about it.
What's a good alternative?
There are many good alternatives. Tuta if you want full encryption. Mailbox.org is also nice and it supports the IMAP protocol.
That's the point (the govs want)
...and Big Tech (there user tracking/profiling becomes much more valuable when there is a real name associated with it).
Freedom of internet is dependent to privacy. Countries' fake concerns about children only pursue to kill privacy, so freedom. But nobody can take out internet. It's not how things work here. At least this is what I hope.
The next step is ISP regulation. Once the ISPs are forced to enforce all of this crap, the free internet will well and truly be dead.
I'd be curious to see how they're gonna sell that. Age verification wouldn't really work there, since you can't buy internet access as a minor.
They didn't even have to sell THIS. They just DID it. Public opinion doesn't matter anymore. Even if it did, this is WAY worse than the Net Neutrality pushback in the past, and it's getting a FRACTION of people mobilized against it.
Life was easier on Usenet.
There is still usenet
If you pay. It used to be free from your ISP. And it was one of the busiest places at that time.
So does he not know about Tor or the dark web ?
He does. He also understands that 99% of the world doesn't, so it has no impact on his statement.