this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
60 points (95.5% liked)

Climate

8635 readers
259 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The New York Times will push almost anything except ending the use of fossil fuels — which are the #1 contributor to the warming we're seeing

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 23 points 2 weeks ago

That butterfly is so big they're gonna have to send out Godzilla to counter it.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

All you'd need to do is build a 50 mile dam. In an area known for intense storms and temperature swings.

[–] Drusas@piefed.social 8 points 2 weeks ago

And earthquakes!

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

They don’t even touch on the fight over shutting down what would have by then become a critical shipping lane.

Perhaps NYT has figured out that ending petroleum use will bankrupt the United States via crash of the petrodollar but they are unwilling to write about that because of the panic it would cause.

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I strongly suspect our technocrat overlords - the ones telling us global warming is a hoax - know very well that climate change is real, and are manipulating and positioning the United States to come out ahead in the new 3° world.

Not because they care about Americans, of course. But they'll need somewhere to live when the rest of the world collapses, and most of their stuff is here.

The United States damning the Bering Strait would give the United States control over that shipping lane. And recent events have proved how vital the control of shipping lanes can be.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We are more than capable of building a few locks if we were going to dam the entire thing.

[–] trailee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

That’s true. It’s more of a political problem than a technical one, sharing control between Russia and Alaska. That Hormuz thing doesn’t inspire a lot of optimism for cooperation. How well will Russia play at all when the intention is to save Europe from debilitating cooling? Shipping arguments would be a distraction, but I’m sure they would be employed.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 2 weeks ago

You would need to dam the whole thing, or not even up to sea level, to impact the ocean currents.

The volume of material required would be something though.

[–] LemmyBruceLeeMarvin@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 weeks ago

This is so Rex Tillerson. We can use capitalist engineering to capitalist engineer our way out of a capitalist caused crisis

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s a seismic zone. Besides the fact that geoengineering like this is probably not a great idea.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah ... and never mind the hundreds of different species you're cutting off from their migration routes. Or all the other possible unintended consequences of this...

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

But have you stopped to think if it's profitable?

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Whatever they can do to drill even more right?

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I’m sure Russia would love a bridge to Alaska