this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
184 points (99.5% liked)

World News

56013 readers
1905 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I'm astonished that both the royal family and Starmer are surviving this. UK politics almost as useless as the US.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

They found the perfect scapegoat in prince Andrew "we didn't know, fuck him. Now move on"

[–] SaraTonin@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

From what I’ve heard from politics reporters, Starmer has been a dead man waling since Galton &. Denton. The reasons he’s not yet gone are a) Labour don’t want to go through the messiness of a change of leader just before elections, and b) they need someone they can get rid of after they’re wiped out in the upcoming elections

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 3 points 3 weeks ago

Because Israel and the CIA put a lot of time and effort into the wealthy of the UK as well as the US.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah because the pedophile cabal has been protecting each other and empowering each other for decades.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Pedophilia is only one of the crimes for which they protect each other. It's an elite-impunity cabal. That's what we need to break.

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 9 points 3 weeks ago

You might think that the country that made sure Jimmy Savile died free with a smile on his face would have learned the lesson not to protect and empower sexual predators, but you would be wrong.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

Mandelson was one of the main instigators of the cabal that drove Corbyn out as Labour leader and installed Starmer.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

They put him there because they knew tramp would like him and get along over common interests :/ not a good look either, but makes a little bit more sense than simply appointing the worst person you know.

[–] Dotdashdot@feddit.uk 4 points 3 weeks ago

Or he bribed his way into the job knowing he’d make a ton more money with the info he’d feed his mates.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's a big club and you ain't in it.

(Thankfully.)