this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
17 points (94.7% liked)

Geopolitics

549 readers
14 users here now

Welcome

Visit us on Matrix at #geopol:matrix.org

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago

Many analysts believe that Iran’s grip on the Strait of Hormuz is only temporary. A widespread expectation is that U.S. and allied naval forces will soon stabilize the situation and that oil flows will resume along familiar lines.

That expectation is flawed. It assumes that to continue to control the strait, Iran must physically close it off. But as we have already seen, you can control the strait without closing it. Today, the strait remains open to tankers. Traffic has dropped by over 90 percent since the war began, though, not because Iran has been sinking every vessel that entered the strait but because, given the credible threat of an attack, insurers withdrew or repriced war-risk coverage. Hitting a cargo ship every few days was more than enough to make the risk unacceptable.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Good news is that Iran will lose is relevance once we don't need the stuff coming through the strait. Aluminum, Sulfur, Helium might be more difficult but oil & gas we have consciously chose to continue the level of consumption we have been despite alternatives becoming increasingly easy to obtain.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Ok, but the Houthis see their political fate as intertwined with Iran and if they shut the Gulf Of Aden down pretty much everybody on earth is going to NOT have the materials they need to do the things they need to do very quickly.

This escalation is bad for everybody on earth.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

It's not going to be easy, fast, convenient or without costs, but I'm saying if Iran becoming a superpower is truly a concern, then there is a method to remove its strongest leverages.