this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
216 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

83534 readers
1747 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 107 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

There should be serious financial consequences for submitting a bogus copyright claim.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 12 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

There aren't any repercussions for submitting a false DMCA claim. There are for pushing the claim after the target files a counterclaim, but it'd require an uphill legal battle that most people aren't able to fight so they simply give in and pull their video even if it falls under fair use.

Then to add to that, YouTube's own policy will suspend your account after a few copyright claims regardless of their merits, and getting strikes removed is nearly impossible.

Basically if you're not a major corporation with a legal team on standby, you're getting screwed by both sides.

[–] artyom@piefed.social 13 points 11 hours ago

There probably are but only if you pursue it in civil court, which I wouldn't be surprised to see Nvidia do.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 78 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

One bullshit system affecting another.

Real cool.

It doesn't have to be like this. We could use government to actually break up and regulate these gigantic companies.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 5 hours ago

Until "could" becomes a reality, I will take "did"

[–] artyom@piefed.social 19 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

This is really less to do with any companies and more to do with poorly written copyright legislation (DMCA).

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

No, the DMCA (which does overall suck) has severe penalties for false takedown requests. It also has severe penalties for failing to honor takedown requests, though, so YouTube made its own system that is decidedly not DMCA and allows any big company to take down videos with impunity regardless of whether their claims have any merit.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 1 points 5 hours ago

Have there ever been any consequences for false takedown requests you could point me at?

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 24 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Who uh .. who do you think wrote the DMCA? That is definitely one of the shitty systems I am referrimg to above.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 28 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

It should be noted that this is illegal. „Abusing Youtube‘s copyright system“ really is just a euphemism for actual theft.

[–] Matty_r@programming.dev 13 points 11 hours ago

Also, I recently learnt that it forces the other channel to provide their personal details directly to the person that raises the claim. I watched a video the other week where some streamer started harassing another streamer, filed a copyright claim to get their personal details, and used that to find out where they go to University etc.

[–] insomniac_lemon@lemmy.cafe 13 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

It's a civil offense though, not a criminal* one. I mean sure Nvidia actually has the lawyers to fight this (assuming this just doesn't get quietly reversed as a "mistake") but often false strikes may as well be legal when the person targeted doesn't have the time/money/willingness/etc to fight it in court.

* at least at face-value. I guess other charges could happen based on actions and intent (fraud etc), but I wouldn't expect that to happen without the civil suit nor would I expect the law to actually have the teeth to actually punish a big company for bullying a nobody.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Since a lot of content creators got a copyright strike from this bad actor I am sure someone will fight this and win easily. Generally speaking it‘s a bad idea to steal someone‘s ad revenue if you‘re from a lawful country like Italy. They win some publicity but lose money from this.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 5 points 9 hours ago

Wasn't the point of the take down notice to highlight that the dlss tech is based on stolen data?

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

And then DLSS fans call running a game without it "rawdogging it", despite choosing the right resolution for the context being the game engines & developers job and not some texture compression algo one. DLSS is a excuse for the devs not doing their job right.