this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
44 points (83.3% liked)

Showerthoughts

41528 readers
610 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After many years, at last I have become sufficiently cantankerous that one egregiously stupid post to c/showerthoughts is enough to make me block someone.

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

Can't remember the last time I saw a shower thought in this community. This is just an opinion community in my eyes.

[–] prex@aussie.zone 20 points 1 day ago

Wait, this isn't a showerthought. Blocked!
/s

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

If it's a 3-hour-old account, I don't worry about it.

If they have extensive post history and it doesn't seem awfully toxic, and their modlog doesn't indicate that this is a habit for them, then I might just assume they're having a bad day and let it slide this time while hiding the thread.

It usually doesn't take many repeats of them posting about kids of rich people street racing or a single mother asking about her teenage son's erections or whatever before I go "this guy again??" At that point I just block them.

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

If it's just the main post, I get it. If it continues in the comment replies, it's more than just a bad day.

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Block who you want. Life is too short to tolerate fools.

[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

As Elvis Costello once famously crooned, 'Only fools Russian.'

[–] vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

valid

also what post was it lol

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is ok to protect your healthy mental space by blocking folks. It isn't a sign of weakness.

I'd even argue that it's a sign of strength, to be able to recognize behavior that you perceive as toxic and block/avoid wankers who display such behavior.

[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I'm not sure, but it feels like a LOT of trolls test the waters of Lemmy by posting their nonsense in this comm.

You mean the one from the obvious troll account that was obvious?

[–] OhmsLawn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] Chippys_mittens@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

You should block me

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Out of all the communities where I've seen people complain about how well posts fit the theme, this one (along with the reddit version) confused me the most. Random thoughts aren't random enough? What?

It feels like first world problems: extreme edition.

But I usually browse by all, so maybe I'm missing something fundamental.

[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Has the world as a wholeprogressed to the point that we couldn't consider all of everything on Lemmy to be first world problems?

How much of a presence do non-first-world people have on Lemmy?

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Get off my mind lawn you kids!

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

I have been broadening my criteria. Some things are casual conversation and if a person is responding like comments are about something is a statement about the definitive definition of something and its like ugh. im sick of this.

[–] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dude admitted that he was trolling and intended to do more. An easily earned block.

[–] MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just a random chud who created an account today to troll and has already been banned. I already forgot his painfully obvious handle.

[–] MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago

Oh okay, doesn't seem like a big deal then.

[–] MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Ah yes, cantankerous, a word I haven't seen in quite a minute. What are the odds, huh?

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You're probably better off auditing a University course then, instead of exchanging ideas on Lemmy.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay you win that's the dumbest response so far

[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

Not so dumb actually. You take whatever course you want for free, get to listen to very smart people that know the topic, and probably learn something. What's the downside?