this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
-81 points (4.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

41504 readers
824 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

That idea is so retarded Trump himself could have come up with it.

It's a sea passage. The only thing it would achieve is make the water radioactive, create a bunch of pollution and kill a lot of fish.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 5 points 21 hours ago

And make it completely unusable for decades

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

IIUC, it'd create little lasting radiation, but yes, it'd kill a lot of fish.

[–] trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yes the radiated water would dillute pretty quickly, unless a radiation source would remain on the bottom. I'm not sure how that would work out exactly. Probably also depends on how far from the bottom the nuke would be at the time of detonation.

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago

wp:Underwater explosion#Properties of water

(my bold)

Effect of neutron exposure on salt water (nuclear explosions only) – most underwater blast scenarios happen in seawater, not fresh or pure water. The water itself is not much affected by neutrons but salt is strongly affected. When exposed to neutron radiation during the microsecond of active detonation of a nuclear pit, water itself does not typically "activate", or become radioactive. The two elements in water, hydrogen and oxygen, can absorb an extra neutron, becoming deuterium and oxygen-17 respectively, both of which are stable isotopes. Even oxygen-18 is stable. Radioactive atoms can result if a hydrogen atom absorbs two neutrons, an oxygen atom absorbs three neutrons, or oxygen-16 undergoes a high energy neutron (n-p) reaction to produce a short-lived nitrogen-16. In any typical scenario, the probability of such multiple captures in significant numbers in the short time of active nuclear reactions around a bomb is very low. Salt in seawater readily absorbs neutrons into both the sodium-23 and chlorine-35 atoms, which change to radioactive isotopes. Sodium-24 has a half-life of about 15 hours, while that of chlorine-36 (which has a lower activation cross-section) is 300,000 years. The sodium is the most dangerous contaminant after the explosion because it has a short half-life.[2][self-published source?] These are generally the main radioactive contaminants in an underwater blast; others are the usual blend of irradiated minerals, coral, unused nuclear fuel, and bomb case components present in a surface blast nuclear fallout, carried in suspension or dissolved in the water. Distillation or evaporating water (clouds, humidity, and precipitation) removes radiation contamination, leaving behind the radioactive salts.

15 hrs per half-life x 10 half-lives

= 150 hrs

= 6.25 days

[–] schnokobaer@feddit.org 4 points 21 hours ago

I think it would create an epic tsunami too! USA! USA!

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

We could nuke the white jouse and break down the US into smaller autonomous countries the sizes of the EU so they can't do as much brain damage on the world.
Same for China and Russia. Way too many super countries.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 5 points 17 hours ago

Regulating big countries like we regulate monopolies. And should regulate billionairs.

Too much power corrupts everything.

[–] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago

The EU is about twice the size of the USA....

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Give each states equal number of nukes?

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 16 hours ago

Each state cannuke their neighbor

[–] axh@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago

You should stop taking showers. That would have a positive impact on the world: first, you might not have idiotic ideas like that anymore. Two, your chances of reproduction would get even smaller, which is also a win for mankind.

[–] regdog@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Bad shower thoughts are my guilty pleasure.

Still gonna downvote them, though.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 9 points 21 hours ago

No we shouldn't nuke Straight of Hummus

We should nuke AmeriKKKa

Where are you from, OP?

[–] gilokee@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

nice spelling, idiot

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 5 points 21 hours ago

I imagine this whole operation in Iran was conceived in the shower. Because it was similarly well thought through as this nuke idea.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

You and me. Together. Tonight.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago

Ain't no time for that. Gotta doomscroll and eat pizza.

[–] markz@suppo.fi 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago
[–] MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You know, maybe freedom of speech isn't such a good idea after all.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure this forum isn't protected. The free exchange of information and ideas wasn't a good thing to support

[–] MrSmoothPP@lemmy.zip -2 points 14 hours ago

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Freedom of speech is always relative to culture and power.

My comment is more a funny way to dismiss OP's opinion, not commentary on free speech.

[–] DMCMNFIBFFF@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

It probably wouldn't stop the drone attacks.