Would love to see Trollito out of there, but assmouth would probably nominate someone even worse.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Pam Bondi.
That shithead trump getting a fourth SC Justice would just be so fitting for the time we're in.
Since now four seems possible, this timeline means we'll probably lose one of the liberal justices as well for an even 5 picks, and a 7-2 court.
Court sizes have shifted before, they can shift again.
The court should be increased to the current number of federal districts like it was intended, before Congress started fucking with it for political reasons. That would be 12.
DC technically has its own separate district Court, so there are technically 13 districts.
- No way both him and Thomas dont retire before 2028.
I think they'd wait until after November, though. Doing it suddenly before the election would be a clear signal they expect to lose. So they'd try to ram it through in December, before the new Congress is sworn it.
If there were any justice in the world he would not retired but die in January 2027 and after the democrats took the house and senate (?) they would just left the vacant empty until the next president.
Lmao, nice joke. The democrats would just approve whorever Trump present.
"We need to reach across the aisle"
If Democrats get control of the senate, we can at least hope Trump is forced to nominate a moderate conservative. Alito and Thomas are unhinged.
The hardest part is they'd need 52 seats at least, to negate the likelihood in a 51-49 situation that Fetterman joins Rs so Vance can tiebreak.
There's too many conservatives on the court as it is; a moderate conservative in this political landscape is just a regular conservative who would still vote on partisan lines on most issues.
The Republicans deliberately waited out Obama's term to appoint Gorsuch to the court, so if the Democrats had any backbone whatsoever, they would be entirely justified in doing the same to any Trump appointee if in control of the Senate.
Sure, but they don't have a backbone. I'm just saying it would be hard to find someone who's not an improvement over Alito.
You bet your ass if it's serious he won't wait for midterms to retire, he'll do it now before Republicans get crushed in the midterms. Unlike the moderates on the court the pedo clan is playing for keeps. They understand the assignment and won't wait until they croak during a democrat controlled term. They'll fight dirty and steal seats if they need to. Ask that cocksucker Bitch McConnell.
Alito and Thomas are ~~unhinged~~ quite obviously and publicly bribed, bought, and paid for.
I think Trollito is a unhinged true believer too.
Thomas's wife, also.
Fuck that guy
$5 says Trump poisoned him.
Alito is such a bootlicker, I bet he poisoned himself
I’m thinking food poisoning